25 Years of Progress in Geoscience Education
Compiled by David Mogk, Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University
"White Papers" and Workshops Addressing Vision and Challenges
Vision from the National Science Foundation, the National Research Council, and PCAST:
- Undergraduate Science, Mathematics and Engineering Education , 1986, the National Science Board calls for strengthening of undergraduate education to prepare the next generation of scientists and engineers. NSB 86-100
- Laboratory instruction,which is at the heart of science and engineering education, has deteriorated to the point where it is often uninspired, tedious, and dull. Too frequently it is conducted in facilities and with instruments that are obsolete and inadequate. (The needs for new instruments alone are estimated at $2-4 billion.) It is being eliminated from many introductory courses. Much too little funding is available to support faculty with creative ideas for laboratory redevelopment.
- Faculty members are often unable to update their disciplinary knowledge continuously or maintain their pedagogical skills, and are largely unable to make skilled use of computers and other advanced technologies. In some fields there are serious shortages of qualified faculty.
- Courses and curricula are frequently out-of-date in content, unimaginative, poorly organized for students with different interests, and fail to reflect recent advances in the understanding of teaching and learning; the same is true of instructional materials now in use. Insufficient faculty energies are devoted to improving the quality of instruction and its appeal to any others than those enrolled as majors in their field.
- Report on the National Science Foundation Disciplinary Workshops on Undergraduate Education , 1989 (NSF 89-3), disciplinary panels focus on the need to address "pipeline" issues to recruit and retain the best students in the STEM disciplines; identified focus areas were: laboratory, course and curriculum, faculty, underrepresented groups, students.
- Shaping the Future: New Expectations for Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology, 1996 (NSF 96-139)–a new focus on STEM education: "What we urge is an America in which all students have access to supportive, excellent undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology, and all students learn these subjects by direct experience with the methods and processes of inquiry."
- From Analysis to Action: Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology,1996–the companion report to Shaping the Future, calling for wholesale reform of undergraduate STEM education. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1996.Download the Report
- National Science Education Standards. 1996, NRC, 272 p.–Establishes the importance of the Earth Sciences in K-12 education on par with the PCBs. Link to National Academy Press
- Geoscience Education: A Recommended Strategy, 1997, Geoscience Education Working Group I (GEWG I) NSF 97-171
- Geoscience Education and Diversity: Vision for the Future and Strategies for Success, 2005, Download the PDF
- Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, 2012,President's Council of Advisors for Science and Technology; recommendations to 1) Catalyze widespread adoption of empirically validated teaching practices, 2) Advocate and provide support for replacing standard laboratory courses with discovery-based research courses, 3) Launch a national experiment in post-secondary mathematics education to address the math preparation gap, and 4) Encourage partnerships among stakeholders to diversify pathways to STEM careers. Download the PDF
- Next Generation Science Standards, 2013–developed by the National Research Council, the National Science Teachers Association, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and Achieve; provides an excellent opportunity for the geosciences to be fully integrated into K-12 education. Dowload the Next Generation Science Standards
Vision from the Geoscience Community
- Scrutiny of Undergraduate Geoscience Education, Is the Viability of the Geosciences in Jeopardy? 1994, A wake-up call that the geosciences were being rendered irrelevant if significant changes were not made to courses and curricula. (AGU Chapman Conference, Conveners: Dotty Stout, Gene Bierly, John Snow, Ed Geary, Frank Ireton, David Mogk, Marilyn Suiter, Laure Wallace).
- Shaping the Future of Undergraduate Earth Science Education Innovation and Change Using an Earth System Approach, 1997, Ireton, Manduca and Mogk (eds) Link to the Report–advocates use of an Earth system approach, integrating concepts from the solid earth, oceanography and atmospheric science.
- Digital Library for Earth System Education (DLESE) A Community Plan, 2000, Manduca and Mogk (eds)–a vision for the development of high quality collections of instructional resources, Earth data sets and imagery, discovery and distribution systems, support services and communication networks; this plan responded to Shaping the Future and the call for establishing a digital clearinghouse of instructional materials.Download the PDF.
- Pathways to Progress–Vision and Plans for Developing the NSDL, 2001, Manduca, McMartin and Mogk (eds)–the roadmap for establishing the National Science Digital Library; the geosciences were major contributors to this effort. Download the PDF. A decadal retrospective of lessons learned in developing the distributed digital network that was the NSDL can be found at Retrospective Essays on a Decade of Building a National Science Digital Library to Transform STEM Education, (2012)
- Revolution in Earth and Space Science Education,2001, Barstow and Geary (eds) Link to Report–"To empower the public to make sound and reasoned choices, earth and space science must be taught throughout the United States in K-12 classrooms and be accessible to all students."
Pedagogy, Course and Curriculum Design, Instructional Resources
Programs supported by the National Science Foundation
- On the Cutting Edge Program for Geoscience Faculty Professional Development–NSF CCLI/TUES funding (Phase III) that supports workshops and websites on a) managing your career, b) enhancing your teaching, and c) geoscience topics.
- Starting Point–Teaching Introductory Geoscience
- Pedagogy in Action–tutorials that demonstrate "what", "why" and "how" to utilize over 50 different teaching strategies with numerous examples.
- Earth Exploration Toolbook–modules and tutorials with step-by-step instructions on how to find, access and use modern Earth datasets for classroom use.
- Using Data in the Classroom Portal–funded by the NSF/NSDL program, provides access to ~600 Earth data sets, tools for using these data, teaching activities and worked examples.
- Integrating Research and Education–funded by NSF/NSDL, this site explores numerous strategies for using digital media to integrate modern research results in geoscience instruction.
- InTeGrate–Interdisciplinary Teaching About Earth for a Sustainable Future–an NSF STEP program that "supports the teaching of geoscience in the context of societal issues both within geoscience courses and across the undergraduate curriculum. Our goal is to develop a citizenry and workforce that can address environmental and resource issues facing our society."
- Macdonald, R.H., Manduca, C.A., Mogk, D.W., and Tewksbury, B.J., 2005, Teaching Methods in Undergraduate Geoscience Courses: Results of the 2004 On the Cutting Edge Survey of U.S. Faculty, Journal of Geoscience Education, v. 53, n. 3, May, 2005, p. 237-252. Download the PDF (Acrobat (PDF) 4.3MB Jan1 14)
- Drummond, C.N., and Markin, J.M., 2008, An Analysis of the Bachelor of Science in Geology Degree as Offered in the United States, Journal of Geoscience Education, v. 56, n. 2, March, 2008, p. 113-119. Download the PDF (Acrobat (PDF) 151kB Jan1 14)
The New Geoscience Cyberinfrastructure and Geo-Education
- Geoscience Education and Cyberinfrastructure. Report from a workshop sponsored by the National Science Foundation, April 19-20, Boulder, CO., 2004, Marlino, M., Sumner, T., and Wright, M., Digital Library for Earth System Education Program Center; University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, 43p. Download the PDF.
- Planning the Future of GeoCyberEducation: Report from a Workshop, 2010, Ryan and Erickson (eds)–addressing the opportunities and potential barriers to student learning. Download the PDF
- EarthCube Education End User's Workshop Report, 2012, Kastens, Krumhansl, Peach (eds); Download the PDF
Earth Science disciplines have engaged community wide discussions to develop these series of "literacies" that define what every scientifically literate citizen should know about the Earth:
- Atmospheric Science Literacy Framework
- Climate Science Literacy
- Ocean Science Literacy
- Earth Science Literacy
- Energy Literacy
Research on Learning
Resources from the National Research Council
- How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School, Expanded Edition, 2000, Bransford et al. (eds); Link to National Academy Press
- Promising Practices in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Education: A Report From Two Workshops. 2011, Download the PDF
Discipline-Based Education Research Understanding and Improving Learning in Undergraduate Science and Engineering, 2012–an emerging field of scholarship that requires deep knowledge of the discipline and collaborative work with cognitive and learning scientists. Link to the National Academy Press to obtain a copy. Access a summary of the major conclusions of the DBER report and Contributions by and Opportunities for the Geosciences in DBER.
Resources from the Geosciences
- Bringing Research on Learning to the Geosciences , 2002, – Manduca, Mogk and Stillings (eds and conveners); Workshop Webpage and download the PDF; brought together geoscience educators and cognitive psychologists to define a research agenda for research on learning in the geosciences.
Earth and Mind: How Geologists Think and Learn About the Earth, 2006, Manduca and Mogk (eds)–contributions from master geologists, cognitive scientists, and geoscience educators reflect on how learning is achieved in the geosciences. Geological Society of America Special Paper 413
- Earth and Mind II: A Synthesis of Research on Thinking and Learning in the Geosciences, 2012, Kastens and Manduca (eds); explorations of temporal reasoning, spatial reasoning, understanding complex systems and learning in the field; Geological Society of America Special Paper 486 and Synthesis Project webpage
- Geoscience Learning Process Research–David McConnell, North Carolina State University
- GARNET–Geoscience Affective Research NETwork
- Qualitative Inquiry in Geoscience Education Research, Feig and Stokes (eds), GSA Special Papers 474.
- The Geocognition Research Lab–Julie Libarkin, Michigan State University; refer to this list of Geoscience Education Research Graduate Programs
About Departments, Professional Organizations
- National Association of Geoscience Teachers publishes Journal of Geoscience Education, In the Trenches, supports regional sections. special interest divisions (Geoscience Education Research, 2-year colleges, Teacher Education) and other sponsored programs.
- Building Strong Geoscience Departments–information about curricula, future of geoscience, defining strong departments, recruitment, assessment, advice for heads and chairs, and much more.
- SAGE 2YC–Supporting and Advancing Geoscience Education in Two-Year Colleges.
- Geological Society of America Geoscience Education Division
Preparation for the Geoscience Workforce
- American Geosciences Institute Workforce Program–data, reports, career information and much more!
Geoscience and the 21st Century Workforce: Considering undergraduate programs in the context of changing employment opportunities–a workshop and web resources convened by the InTeGrate project.
- Teaching the Methods of Geoscience–explorations of the "habits of mind" that are essential in the training of geoscientists; workshop and website convened by the InTeGrate project.
Teacher Preparation and Enhancement
- NSF Collaboratives for Excellence in Teacher Preparation (CETP)–during 1993 to ~2000 the CETP program sought to develop teacher preparation programs by linking resources from STEM departments and Colleges of Education; there was an emphasis on reform of introductory STEM courses as many pre-service teachers take these courses; these courses were to model "best practices" in pedagogy. 17 Collaboratives were funded at $1 million/year for up to 5 years. SRI International (March 2001) published the Summative Evaluation of Excellence in Teacher Preparation report for a summary of the major outcomes of this program. Download the PDF
- Preparing Teachers to Teach –portal developed via the DLESE Community Center
- NAGT Teacher Education Division– a newly formed division of NAGT seeks to improve geoscience teaching by improving teacher content and pedagogical knowledge and by encouraging research on best teaching practices.
- Teacher Preparation Modules and Courses–from the InTeGrate project; this project is developing modules aimed at courses for pre-service teachers including both content courses (usually taught in science departments) and methods courses.
Recruitment and Retention of Students in the STEM Disciplines
Tobias, Sheila, 1990, They're Not Dumb, They're Different: Stalking the Second Tier, Research Corporation. This is the is the ground-breaking study of why college students abandon science for other disciplines. The keyS to retaining the "second tier" (those students who are not at the top of their class, who have been discouraged from pursuing careers in STEM disciplines) are: 1) Engaging teaching practices, 2) Efforts towards recruitment and retention,3) Increased dialogue and demonstrations in class,4) Greater emphasis on independent thinking and context,5) Encouraging cooperation rather than competition among students. See books by Sheila Tobias
Seymour, E. and Hewitt, N., 2000, Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences, Westview Press, 444 pp. "Poor teaching was the most significant influence on STEM majors' decisions to switch fields." Jay Labov writes (Cell Biol Educ. 2004 Winter; 3(4): 212–214). "One of the most discouraging aspects of this loss is that students who enter college with intentions to major in science and then change their minds following completion of introductory courses have academic credentials equal to those who continue to major in the natural sciences (Seymour and Hewitt, 1997 ). Thus, poorly taught introductory courses could be contributing to the loss of a significant and more diverse talent pool from the STEM disciplines."
Diversity, Recruitment of Underrepresented Groups
- National Science Foundation, 2000a: Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2000. National Science Foundation Report NSF 00‐327, 254 pp.
- National Science Foundation, 2000b: Report of the Geosciences Diversity Workshop. National Science Foundation NSF 01‐53.
- Holmes, M. A. and O'Connell, S., 2003, Where are the Women Geoscience Professors? Download the PDF
- National Research Council, 2007, Understanding Interventions that Encourage Minorities to Pursue Research Careers, a Workshop Report. Download the PDF
- Resources and Strategies for Recruiting a Diverse Workforce–advice to Department Heads/Chairs and Search Committees to help recruit a diverse professoriate.
Scientific Portals (including education and outreach services)
- Integrated Earth Data Applications
- Marine Geoscience Data System GeoPRISMS Data Portal(formerly MARGINS)
- EarthChem–global geochemical data and tools
- Integrated Research Institutions for Seismology (IRIS)–seismological data, data products and tools
- EarthScope–US Array portable seismometer network, Plate Boundary Observatory (PBO) geodetic data, San Andreas Fault Observatory at Depth (SAFOD) and much more!