End of Workshop Evaluation

Purpose: Please reflect on this workshop and let us know what worked and what needs improvement. Your input is valuable to us as we plan future workshops. Your responses to this survey will be kept confidential. We would like you to enter your name below. This will improve our ability to evaluate the program by allowing us to link information about your workshop experience to your responses to other evaluation instruments. The evaluator will remove your name from the survey results and only use it to make this linkage. The workshop conveners will not see your name.

Your name:

What aspects of the workshop were the most valuable for you? And why?

Least valuable and why?

How well did this workshop encourage participation and establish a community that could work and learn throughout the program? Share any thoughts you have for approaches that worked or didn't work as well in this area.

What big ideas from the workshop would most engage colleagues with promoting quantitative reasoning?

What do you plan to change in your teaching or professional work related to the workshop experience?

What do you see as the steps you need to implement these plans?

Facilitation, Communication, Logistics
Please rate to the extent you agree with the following statements with 4=Agree and 1=Disagree.

The pre-workshop communications gave me the information I needed to learn about and prepare for the workshop.

Materials on the website were useful in preparing for the workshop.

The design of the workshop facilitated exchange of expertise among participants.

The workshop events engaged me in active learning related to its goals.

The workshop sessions were well facilitated.

The logistics for the workshop were well executed.

I believe the goals of the workshop as stated were met:

a. Participants will discuss and synthesize the needs, challenges, and current best strategies for teaching quantitative reasoning, skills, and literacy for undergraduate STEM classes in environmental science related fields (e.g., ecology, hydrology, Earth science, geology, climatology, soil science, limnology, etc.)

b. Participants will learn about Project EDDIE and the teaching modules that were previously developed as part of the Environmental Data or Macrosystems initiatives.

c. Participants will discuss and contribute ideas and strategies that can inform the design, development, and implementation of future Project EDDIE curricular modules and professional development opportunities to address the needs and challenges identified by the community.

d. The workshop will enable networking, sharing, and collaboration among participants interested in improving their teaching of quantitative reasoning through open-ended exploration and interpretation of real-world data

e. The workshop provided opportunities for participants to contribute towards a community vision synthesis regarding the best practices and strategies for addressing the needs and challenges associated with teaching quantitative reasoning, skills, and literacy

Please comment on any of your ratings, particularly if you disagreed with any item (rated any a "1" or "2").

Please indicate your current satisfaction with this workshop by selecting the appropriate number (10=Very Satisfied and 1=Very Dissatisfied).

Comments to explain your rating:

Navigation

Workshop content
Needs and Strategies
Social Network
Social Network- Prior

Name Email