This activity was selected for the On the Cutting Edge Reviewed Teaching Collection
This activity has received positive reviews in a peer review process involving five review categories. The five categories included in the process are
- Scientific Accuracy
- Alignment of Learning Goals, Activities, and Assessments
- Pedagogic Effectiveness
- Robustness (usability and dependability of all components)
- Completeness of the ActivitySheet web page
For more information about the peer review process itself, please see https://serc.carleton.edu/teachearth/activity_review.html.
- First Publication: October 17, 2007
- Reviewed: December 10, 2020 -- Reviewed by the On the Cutting Edge Activity Review Process
Induced Infiltration
How to use this module
Defining pumping of Wells G. and H was an important and contested issue during the trial. The induced infiltration module provides references regarding methods to measure induced infiltration and quantify surface water loss to groundwater from aquifer pumping. This module references different techniques for quantifying groundwater infiltration from streams. The purpose of this information is familiarizing users with the differing methods to quantify Stream loss due to induced infiltration so they can assess the effectiveness of the USGS data used during the trial.
Module design perspective
the USGS used river gauging upstream and downstream of Wells G. and H. prior to, then while the wells were pumped. The net loss measured by gauging was interpreted in as the infiltration rate from the river. Design of this module is intended to provide the user with an appreciation of the advantages and limitations of using this method to quantify infiltration. Issues such as change in the base flow, precipitation and run off, channel lining, etc. all would play a significant role in establishing the infiltration rate. By evaluating a measurement methods along with hydrologic data presented in Module 6-Flooding, a user can form critical evaluations of the accuracy and reproducibility of the USGS data presented in court testimony.
Activity Page
Infiltration Activity Page
Student Assignment
Student Materials
Supplementary Readings
- 7022 Data shows wells may draw river water (Acrobat (PDF) 37kB Jul3 06), 14 May 1986
Dan Kennedy, Daily Times Chronicle
- 7023 Judge Skinner questions credibility of witness (Acrobat (PDF) 53kB Jul3 06), 15 May 1986
Dan Kennedy, Daily Times Chronicle
- 7024 1978 report said aquifer draws from Aberjona River (Acrobat (PDF) 46kB Jul3 06), 16 May 1986
Dan Kennedy, Daily Times Chronicle
- 7025 A difficult week for plaintiffs' scientist in toxic trial (Acrobat (PDF) 33kB Jul3 06), 19 May 1986
Dan Kennedy, Daily Times Chronicle
- 7026 Chemical findings are inconsistent (Acrobat (PDF) 47kB Jul3 06), 21 May 1986
Dan Kennedy, Daily Times Chronicle
- Science fair atmosphere as geologist explains river flow, 22 May 1986
- 7027 Pinder calls testifying "exhaustive, exhausting" (Acrobat (PDF) 37kB Jul3 06), 23 May 1986
Dan Kennedy, Daily Times Chronicle
- 7028 Plaintiffs may conclude case today or Monday (Acrobat (PDF) 42kB Jul3 06), 29 May 1986
Dan Kennedy, Daily Times Chronicle