Identifying Facies in a Transgressive Sequence from the Mid-Atlantic Coast
Summary
The transgressive coastal sequence will be explored by students in an activity based on high-resolution seismic profiles collected off Assateague Island, Maryland and Virginia.
Context
Audience
This activity is designed for a required course in Stratigraphy for undergraduate majors.
Skills and concepts that students must have mastered
In previous exercises, students have described cores (lithologic description, with basic interpretation of what major lithologic changes could indicate), and have interpreted lithologic changes from a core transect across a barrier island into the back-barrier lagoon (either from actual cores or from logs of cores collected previously).
How the activity is situated in the course
This activity is about two-thirds of the way through the course, following discussion of depositional systems and facies models, and as an introduction to the basic concepts of sequence stratigraphy.
Goals
Content/concepts goals for this activity
Discussed in lecture prior to the exercise:
Factors affecting relative sea level
eustatic sea level, sediment supply, tectonic movement
the result: transgression, stillstand, or regression
prograding and retrograding units
General concept of depositional environments and lithofacies
Walther's Law and relation between lateral and vertical facies changes
General process of barrier-island transgression
Concepts incorporated into the exercise:
Primary facies associated with a barrier island and shoreface
characteristic geometries and bedding of facies
vertical and lateral facies relations
Components of a seismic sequence
bounding surfaces
shoreface ravinement—process and result
Accommodation space and preservation potential
Higher order thinking skills goals for this activity
Interpreting deposition and erosion from a seismic profile
Visualization of a reconstructed map view of a barrier-island depositional system Visualization of 3-D structure of a sedimentary sequence from 2-D profiles
Visualization of 3 dimensions plus time, as the transgression proceeds
Iterative interpretation, and evaluating multiple working hypotheses
Other skills goals for this activity
Working in groups.
My Stratigraphy course is a University Writing Across the Curriculum course, so students will be required to write a brief report with description and interpretation of the seismic sections that they work on.
Description of the activity/assignment
The transgressive coastal sequence, as a fundamental concept in stratigraphy, will be explored by the students in a hands-on activity based on a set of high-resolution seismic profiles collected in the shoreface off Assateague Island, Maryland and Virginia. Small groups of 2-3 students will identify primary surfaces, such as the ravinement surface and sequence boundaries, and major sedimentary facies, such as offshore shoals, flood-tidal deltas, and tidal inlets, in a set of shore-parallel and shore-perpendicular lines. The exercise begins with factors controlling relative sea level and leads into accommodation space and preservation potential.
Determining whether students have met the goals
Each Task has a specific product—an interpreted section, facies diagram, isopach map, or other synthesis. Points are assigned to each Task, and points are accumulated for the entire exercise.
If the product of a task is worth 20 points, 10 pts are given for meeting the minimum (generally following directions and creating a product), 5 more pts assigned for thoroughness and accuracy of interpretation, and a final 5 pts for quality of work.
Points may be deducted for a task that is turned in late or sloppily thrown together, for formatting errors such as no labels, or for an unclear or disorganized written explanation.
The instructor will review the students' work at regular intervals as tasks are completed, and lead a discussion by the class of the results to that point. The later tasks require reasonably correct interpretations for the initial tasks. In cases that a group is substantially off track, the instructor may redirect the line of thinking/interpretation.
More information about assessment tools and techniques.If the product of a task is worth 20 points, 10 pts are given for meeting the minimum (generally following directions and creating a product), 5 more pts assigned for thoroughness and accuracy of interpretation, and a final 5 pts for quality of work.
Points may be deducted for a task that is turned in late or sloppily thrown together, for formatting errors such as no labels, or for an unclear or disorganized written explanation.
The instructor will review the students' work at regular intervals as tasks are completed, and lead a discussion by the class of the results to that point. The later tasks require reasonably correct interpretations for the initial tasks. In cases that a group is substantially off track, the instructor may redirect the line of thinking/interpretation.
Teaching materials and tips
- Activity Description/Assignment (Microsoft Word 40kB Jun23 06)
- Instructors Notes (Microsoft Word 31kB Jun23 06)
Share your modifications and improvements to this activity through the Community Contribution Tool »
Other Materials
- Trackline map for seismic profile AI-04.01 (Acrobat (PDF) 857kB Jun23 06)
- Seismic and side-scan sonar profiles AI-04.01 (Acrobat (PDF) 1.5MB Jun23 06)
- Interpreted seismic section AI-04.01 (Acrobat (PDF) 296kB Jun23 06)
- Seismic and side-scan sonar profiles AI-04.05 (Acrobat (PDF) 1.8MB Jun23 06)
- Interpreted seismic section AI-04.05 (Acrobat (PDF) 653kB Jun23 06)