Is the New Madrid Seismic Zone at risk for a large earthquake?
This activity was selected for the On the Cutting Edge Exemplary Teaching Collection
Resources in this top level collection a) must have scored Exemplary or Very Good in all five review categories, and must also rate as “Exemplary” in at least three of the five categories. The five categories included in the peer review process are
- Scientific Accuracy
- Alignment of Learning Goals, Activities, and Assessments
- Pedagogic Effectiveness
- Robustness (usability and dependability of all components)
- Completeness of the ActivitySheet web page
For more information about the peer review process itself, please see https://serc.carleton.edu/teachearth/activity_review.html.
This page first made public: Jun 4, 2010
Skills and concepts that students must have mastered
- Students must be able to read scientific papers and discuss them via an asynchronous discussion forum
- Students should be at least conversant with spreadsheet software, or better yet, a plotting program such as matlab, in order to conduct the data analysis
- Basic math skills such as knowledge of logarithms and the relationship between position, velocity, and acceleration are helpful.
- Knowing the meaning of "extrapolation" is useful, but it is also explained in a variety of ways during the lesson.
How the activity is situated in the course
Content/concepts goals for this activity
- Describe the cyclical process of strain accumulation, earthquake generation, and post-seismic relaxation along plate boundaries.
- Define "recurrence interval."
- Explain the basic mathematical and physical tenets of plate tectonics.
- Describe the 1811–1812 sequence of large events on the New Madrid Seismic Zone and explain how scientists have determined the properties of these events.
- Describe potential hazards/consequences of a sequence similar to the 1811–1812 sequence occurring today.
- Analyze a collection of various datasets to determine the likelihood of such a scenario.
Higher order thinking skills goals for this activity
- Summarize various hypotheses for the existence of seismicity away from plate boundaries.
- Construct a frequency-magnitude plot using earthquake catalog data
- Compare frequency-magnitude diagrams for intraplate regions, plate boundary regions, and global datasets
- Extrapolate from a frequency-magnitude diagram to estimate an earthquake recurrence interval
- Explain ways in which recurrence interval is estimated for a given fault and compare the inherent uncertainties associated with each method
Other skills goals for this activity
- read and discuss sets of papers in small groups and as a whole class. Groups will explain the gist of their assigned papers to the rest of the class
- rewrite and update a USGS pamphlet regarding earthquake risk in the central USA including their own results from an earthquake catalog data analysis
Description of the activity/assignment
Adaptations that allow this activity to be successful in an online environmentThis lesson was constructed specifically for an online course and didn't exist beforehand. I think it could work in a face-to-face course, too.
Elements of this activity that are most effectiveStudents,especially ones who are not as literate with software plotting / analysis programs, find the problem set somewhat difficult because the datasets are large and I am asking them to collect the data themselves, then use it to make a second-order plot and analyze that, instead of just plotting "A" vs. "B" and analyzing it.
That being said, I know that students are excited to be able to produce a plot themselves that exactly mimics one they can find in a published paper, and furthermore they are happy to find resources such as the USGS earthquake catalog that contain available real-time data.
The part where they have to compare and contrast the strengths and weaknesses of each technique used to study the NMSZ (seismology, paleoseismology, GPS, etc) is important because they get a real sense of how different approaches are important to resolve a scientific debate. I know they are learning something when they get frustrated because there isn't an easy answer!
Recommendations for other faculty adapting this activity to their own course:-Be prepared to help students get through the technical aspects of some of the scientific papers, especially if they are not used to reading scientific papers. When I pick the papers for them to read, I purposely pick ones that aren't too long (Science, Nature, GRL, etc) and I try to pick ones that came with a press release, "news and views" or similar, and then I tell the students to read the press release first and then the paper.
-Be prepared to give students hints about counting and sorting data to make the frequency-magnitude diagrams because you'd rather lead them towards how to make the plots and then let them get on with the analysis as opposed to letting them get so frustrated with their lack of technical skills that they aren't interested in the science anymore. This exercise should be about seismology; it shouldn't be an excel tutorial! I have a little set of screen capture movie how-to hints under a hidden url, and when I can tell that a student is really suffering I reveal them.
Determining whether students have met the goals
The culminating pamphlet update has specific instructions about necessary topics to include so I can see if they have mastered the objectives originally laid out in the lesson outline.
Download teaching materials and tips
- Activity Description:
- NMSZ earthquake catalog problem set key (Acrobat (PDF) 511kB Jun16 10)This key is for spring 2010. I usually update the problem set every year so that students are dealing with the most recent data available.
- Discussion grading rubric (Acrobat (PDF) 47kB Jun4 10)
and this specific lesson is here: https://www.e-education.psu.edu/earth501/content/p4.html