Normal Faults in Sand in a Shoe Box
This activity was selected for the On the Cutting Edge Reviewed Teaching Collection
This activity has received positive reviews in a peer review process involving five review categories. The five categories included in the process are
- Scientific Accuracy
- Alignment of Learning Goals, Activities, and Assessments
- Pedagogic Effectiveness
- Robustness (usability and dependability of all components)
- Completeness of the ActivitySheet web page
For more information about the peer review process itself, please see http://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/review.html.
This page first made public: Jun 18, 2004
Skills and concepts that students must have mastered
How the activity is situated in the course
Content/concepts goals for this activity
Higher order thinking skills goals for this activity
Other skills goals for this activity
Description of the activity/assignment
Students prepare for the exercise by reading about normal faults in the structural geology textbook. The class is divided into groups of 3-5 students. Each group is given two clear plastic shoe boxes, each of which has one end cut off so that one box slides lengthwise into the other box. Students are charged with running three extensional sandbox experiments during the class period, in which they fill the shoe box with sand having different physical properties (ex. grain size, clay content). The groups have access to materials (such as Saran plastic wrap) that can be used to line the boxes and provide different physical properties along the basal detachment.
Students are assigned three main tasks:
- to explore a variety of physical parameters that may influence the characteristics of normal faults in analog models,
- to observe typical geometry and kinematics of normal fault development in an extensional setting,
- and to draw inferences and form hypotheses about the general controls on normal faulting.
Students take notes on the conditions of each experiment, then write brief descriptions of geometric characteristics of the faults. They are asked to evaluate which observations appear to be repeatable from one experiment to another. After the groups have finished running experiments and taking notes, the class reassembles for an instructor-led brainstorming session. The instructor makes a list of student-generated observations, key parameters, and possible inferences on the board. The instructor leads the class in a discussion that addresses issues such as the key characteristics of normal faults, kinematics, mechanical principles, predictability of results, and the applications of analog models.
Determining whether students have met the goals
Download teaching materials and tips
- Activity Description/Assignment (Microsoft Word 29kB Jun11 04)
- Instructors Notes (Microsoft Word 28kB Jun11 04)
- Handout: note log for experiments (Microsoft Word 27kB Jun11 04)
Cloos, E., 1968, Experimental analysis of Gulf Coast fracture patterns, American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin: v.152, p. 535-549.
Davis, G.H. and Reynolds, S.J. (1996), Structural Geology of Rocks and Regions, 2nd ed., Wiley, p. 307-309.
McClay, K.R., 1990, Extensional fault systems in sedimentary basins: a review of analogue model studies: Marine and Petroleum Geology, v. 7, p. 206-233.
McClay, K.R., Dooley, T., Whitehouse, P., and Mills, M. (2002), 4-D evolution of rift systems: Insights from scaled physical models: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 86, p. 935-959.