Unit 1 Hazards at Transform Plate Boundaries
These materials have been reviewed for their alignment with the Next Generation Science Standards as detailed below. Visit InTeGrate and the NGSS to learn more.
OverviewStudents first analyze map and historical data along the San Andreas fault to discover the complexity of an actual plate boundary and the influence of human factors (population density and building strength) on the earthquake hazard it presents. They then use a short earthquake record from San Francisco and graphical methods to project longer term recurrence intervals and probabilities. Teachers can emphasize the similarity in approach to predicting flood recurrence and hazards. Science and Engineering Practices emphasize analysis and interpretation of map data, using mathematics and extrapolating trends on a log-log plot to calculate probabilities, and constructing an argument for hazard mitigation resources based on evidence. Cross-Cutting Concepts include identifying patterns, considering cause and effect in earthquake damage, and quantifying change over time along a fault segment.
Science and Engineering Practices
Using Mathematics and Computational Thinking: Use digital tools (e.g., computers) to analyze very large data sets for patterns and trends. MS-P5.1:
Constructing Explanations and Designing Solutions: Construct an explanation that includes qualitative or quantitative relationships between variables that predict(s) and/or describe(s) phenomena. MS-P6.1:
Analyzing and Interpreting Data: Use graphical displays (e.g., maps, charts, graphs, and/or tables) of large data sets to identify temporal and spatial relationships. MS-P4.2:
Analyzing and Interpreting Data: Construct, analyze, and/or interpret graphical displays of data and/or large data sets to identify linear and nonlinear relationships. MS-P4.1:
Using Mathematics and Computational Thinking: Use mathematical, computational, and/or algorithmic representations of phenomena or design solutions to describe and/or support claims and/or explanations. HS-P5.2:
Engaging in Argument from Evidence: Construct, use, and/or present an oral and written argument or counter-arguments based on data and evidence. HS-P7.4:
Analyzing and Interpreting Data: Apply concepts of statistics and probability (including determining function fits to data, slope, intercept, and correlation coefficient for linear fits) to scientific and engineering questions and problems, using digital tools when feasible. HS-P4.2:
Analyzing and Interpreting Data: Analyze data using tools, technologies, and/or models (e.g., computational, mathematical) in order to make valid and reliable scientific claims or determine an optimal design solution. HS-P4.1:
Cross Cutting Concepts
Stability and Change: Explanations of stability and change in natural or designed systems can be constructed by examining the changes over time and forces at different scales, including the atomic scale. MS-C7.1:
Patterns: Graphs, charts, and images can be used to identify patterns in data. MS-C1.4:
Patterns: Patterns can be used to identify cause and effect relationships. MS-C1.3:
Cause and effect: Cause and effect relationships may be used to predict phenomena in natural or designed systems. MS-C2.2:
Stability and Change: Change and rates of change can be quantified and modeled over very short or very long periods of time. Some system changes are irreversible. HS-C7.2:
Patterns: Empirical evidence is needed to identify patterns. HS-C1.5:
Disciplinary Core Ideas
Natural Hazards: Mapping the history of natural hazards in a region, combined with an understanding of related geologic forces can help forecast the locations and likelihoods of future events. MS-ESS3.B1:
Plate Tectonics and Large-Scale System Interactions: Plate tectonics is the unifying theory that explains the past and current movements of the rocks at Earth’s surface and provides a framework for understanding its geologic history. Plate movements are responsible for most continental and ocean-floor features and for the distribution of most rocks and minerals within Earth’s crust. HS-ESS2.B2:
Earth and Human Activity: Analyze and interpret data on natural hazards to forecast future catastrophic events and inform the development of technologies to mitigate their effects. MS-ESS3-2:
This material was developed and reviewed through the InTeGrate curricular materials development process. This rigorous, structured process includes:
- team-based development to ensure materials are appropriate across multiple educational settings.
- multiple iterative reviews and feedback cycles through the course of material development with input to the authoring team from both project editors and an external assessment team.
- real in-class testing of materials in at least 3 institutions with external review of student assessment data.
- multiple reviews to ensure the materials meet the InTeGrate materials rubric which codifies best practices in curricular development, student assessment and pedagogic techniques.
- review by external experts for accuracy of the science content.
This activity was selected for the On the Cutting Edge Reviewed Teaching Collection
This activity has received positive reviews in a peer review process involving five review categories. The five categories included in the process are
- Scientific Accuracy
- Alignment of Learning Goals, Activities, and Assessments
- Pedagogic Effectiveness
- Robustness (usability and dependability of all components)
- Completeness of the ActivitySheet web page
For more information about the peer review process itself, please see http://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/review.html.
This page first made public: Apr 28, 2015
This unit addresses several overarching goals of the InTeGrate program including analyzing geoscience-related grand challenges facing society (impact of natural hazards), developing students' ability to address interdisciplinary problems and use authentic geoscience data, and improving students' geoscientific thinking skills (interpretation of multiple data sets).
Unit 1 Learning Objectives
- Students will be able to describe characteristics of transform boundaries.
- Students will be able to analyze information about significant historic earthquakes along the North American/Pacific transform plate boundary in California and the risks of those earthquakes to population centers.
- Students will be able to use data to determine the conditional probabilities of earthquakes of various magnitudes in the San Francisco and Los Angeles areas over the next year, and over the next 30 years.
- Students will compare their results to the regional earthquake probability map for California and assess the regional earthquake hazard along this plate boundary.
Context for Use
This unit is designed to be completed in a 50-minute class period, with suggestions for extension if a longer time period is available (for instance, a lab period). Students are expected to come to the activity with the following background:
- Familiarity with the basic tenets of plate tectonics, as well as the general characteristics of plate boundaries. One suggested activity is Using Google Earth to Explore Plate Tectonics, by Laurel Goodell.
- Familiarity with the concept of earthquake magnitude and what is considered a "major" earthquake (magnitude 6 or greater).
- Completion of the prework assignment (which could be incorporated into class time if a longer time is available).
- Ability to use a scientific calculator, and ability to plot data on graphs with logarithmic scales. See resources for teaching logarithms.
Description and Teaching Materials
(15 min) As preparation for this unit, students complete the Unit 1 prework assignment This first asks them to characterize the transform plate boundary between the Pacific and North American plates in California, using a map which shows:
- Plate labels and arrows depicting the relative motion between the Pacific and North American plates.
- Epicenters of earthquakes with magnitudes >=5.0 from 1983-2012.
- Locations of faults active in the last 130,000 years.
Students are then asked questions about historic earthquakes in the study area, significant either because of their magnitude or because of the amount of deaths/damage caused. They base their responses on:
- A map showing the epicenters of the 9 earthquakes and the population density of California, from the 2010 Census.
- A chart listing information about the 9 earthquakes including year, fault(s) involved, magnitude, and deaths/damage caused.
Finally, students are shown the earthquake probability map for California and asked to speculate about how they think scientists calculate probabilities for events that have not yet happened.
- Unit 1 prework, student handout, Word (Microsoft Word 2007 (.docx) 3.7MB Mar19 15)
Unit 1 prework, student handout, PDF (Acrobat (PDF) 1.7MB Mar19 15)
- Unit 1 prework images and information, PowerPoint (PowerPoint 2007 (.pptx) 1.1MB Mar19 15) for review in class
- Unit 1 prework layers for Google Earth, kmz file (KMZ File 7.9MB Dec3 14)
Optional; for exploring data interactively with Google Earth.
For instructors only:
1. (5 min) Instructor starts with a class discussion, eliciting earthquake experience stories from students. (Where were they? What did they experience? What do/did they know about the characteristics of the quake? How well prepared were they—did they know what to do? What were the effects of the earthquake—damage, casualties?) If time permits, students can break up into small groups to review and compare answers from the preparation assignment.
2. (10 min) Instructor leads a class discussion which reviews and clarifies the prework and sets up the activity, covering the following:
- The general characteristics of transform plate boundaries (right-lateral or left-lateral relative motion between plates, shallow earthquakes on multiple faults along linear trends marking the plate boundary, general absence of volcanism). If time permits, these characteristics could also be compared and contrasted with those of convergent and divergent boundaries.
- Recognition of the complexity and width of this particular plate boundary, as well as plate boundaries in general (especially compared to maps in which plate boundaries are represented by single lines).
- Recognition that the damage and casualties resulting from a particular earthquake are not just dependent on earthquake size, but also the amount of property and people in the vicinity.
- The value of quantifying the probability of earthquakes of significant size in populated areas. For example, the San Francisco area has not experienced an earthquake of magnitude greater than 6.9 in the last 30 years. Yet we know they do happen (e.g. the 1906 earthquake; two recent studies estimate the magnitude at 7.7 and 7.9 (more information). So how do we determine the probability of these large, infrequent but potentially devastating events?
- A quick look at the California Earthquake Probability map, posing the question about the basis on which such maps are constructed.
3. (25 min) Students fill out worksheets that allow them to calculate for the San Francisco area (33.5-35.5°N / 116.75-119.75°W), the probability of various-sized earthquakes occurring in these regions over the next year, and over the next 30 years. Step-by-step instructions are given in the student handout and in the PowerPoint guide. Students can work through the exercise on their own or in small groups as the instructor walks around, or the whole class can go through the exercise together as the instructor presents the PowerPoint.
Notes on the exercise:
This is a modification and expansion of Eric Baer's exercise: Determining Earthquake Probability and Recurrence from Past Seismic Events which focuses on determining recurrence intervals (return periods). Here we add calculation of probabilities. To make this manageable in the allotted time, the geographic regions are already defined for the San Francisco (and Los Angeles) area on the student worksheets, and the numbers of earthquakes in each magnitude range are given. Also, certain data are filled in, so as they work, students can confirm that they are on the right track.
We focus on calculating annual probabilities and 30-year probabilities. We note that 30 years is a time period of interest to humans (it is a good chunk of a typical human life span, the length of a traditional 30-year mortgage, etc.)
This approach assumes that the occurrence of an earthquake of a particular size in a particular area does not have causal or anti-causal effects on the occurrence of other earthquakes (e.g. if you roll a die and 4 comes up 10 times in a row, the probability of 4 coming up on the 11th role is still 1/6). This is an important assumption—exceptions would include foreshocks or aftershocks of major earthquake, "locked" segments of faults (e.g. the Parkfield experiment) where stress may be building up over time, or "creeping" fault segments. It is also based on counting earthquakes in a large enough area and for a long enough time period to have a reasonable statistical base.
4. (10 min) The end of the exercise includes three important formative assessment questions and two optional ones. See "Assessment" section below.
- Unit 1 activity PowerPoint guide (PowerPoint 2007 (.pptx) 6.9MB Mar19 15) works through San Francisco area data
- Unit 1 activity, student handout, Word (Microsoft Word 2007 (.docx) 1013kB Mar19 15)
Unit 1 activity, student handout, PDF (Acrobat (PDF) 1.3MB Mar19 15)
- San Francisco area, student worksheet (Acrobat (PDF) 50kB Feb1 15)
For instructors only:
Teaching Notes and Tips
Handouts, instructor notes, class PowerPoint files, and keys are suitable for a 50- or 75-minute class.
To modify this unit in combination with Unit 2 (Risk at Transform Plate Boundaries) for a lab period, we recommend combining both the Unit 1 and Unit 2 prework assignments into one pre-lab assignment, and then in the lab session, doing the Unit 1 classroom activity followed by the Unit 2 classroom activity. Selected discussion/assessment questions could be assigned as a post-lab report.
To combine this Unit 1 with Unit 2 (Risk at Transform Plate Boundaries) for use in a single two- to three-hour lab period, we recommend combining both the Unit 1 and Unit 2 prework assignments into one pre-lab assignment. Little modification to the prework content is needed, although the references to page numbers in the Unit 2 prework should be checked for consistency. In the lab session itself, the Unit 2 classroom activity would directly follow the Unit 1 classroom activity.
Within the activity, formative assessment is ongoing. Students progressively complete their probability worksheets (stopping at each "stop" sign in the PowerPoint activity guide) and compare their results to the appropriate answers (presented after each "stop" sign) before going on to the next step. Students thus progressively check their own work; the instructor does not need to manually grade it, although he or she may want students to hand it in as documentation of the activity's completion.
To complete the formative assessment, students should answer the questions listed below (and included in the PowerPoint guide and the student handout). Depending on time constraints and/or interest, the questions could be incorporated into small group discussions or given as individual or group homework assignments.
- No earthquake with magnitude 7.0-7.9 has occurred in the San Francisco area over the 30-year study period.
a. What is the probability of an earthquake of magnitude 7.0-7.9 occurring in the San Francisco in the next 30 years? Show your work.
b. Do you think this probability is high enough to warrant concern? Why or why not?
- Suppose that a particular area has an MRI of 30 years for earthquakes of M = 6.0-6.9. Suppose a M=6.7 earthquake occurs in that area this year. How does this affect the probability of such an earthquake occurring next year?
- The statewide probability map suggests that overall, there is a 99% chance of a damaging M=(6.7 or greater) earthquake occurring somewhere in the state in the next 30 years. Should resources for earthquake preparedness be spread evenly across the state? Support your position with information from this unit.
Student mastery of the unit objectives can be assessed by having them repeat the analysis for:
- The Los Angeles area (33.5-35.5°N / 116.75-119.75°W), using the spreadsheet provided below which includes numbers of earthquakes for each magnitude range filled in.
- Other areas (their hometown areas, for example). They would need guidance in choosing an appropriately-sized area for sufficient statistics, and would have to do get their own earthquake counts via the databases mentioned under Resources and References. Microsoft Word, pdf, and Excel versions of the blank worksheet are provided below.
- What is the probability of a magnitude 7.0-7.9 earthquake in the Los Angeles area in the next 30 years? How does this compare to what you calculated for a magnitude 7.0-7.9 earthquake in the San Francisco area?
Additional assessment questions appropriate for exams might include questions such as:
An M=5.0 earthquake has a recurrence interval (return period) of 10 years.
- What is the probability of that earthquake occurring this year?
- Suppose such an earthquake occurs this year. How does that affect the probability of such an earthquake occurring next year?
- What is the probability of that earthquake occurring in the next 10 years?
- Los Angeles area, student worksheet, PDF (Acrobat (PDF) 61kB Feb1 15)
- blank probability worksheet, PDF (Acrobat (PDF) 66kB Sep27 14)
- blank probability worksheet, Excel (Excel 2007 (.xlsx) 37kB Sep27 14)
For instructors only:
References and Resources
USGS primer on how earthquake shake hazard maps are developed. Note, however, that this unit focuses on earthquake probability (Steps 1 and 2 of the 5 steps discussed on this website), not shaking hazard. But this site includes much useful information on how hazard maps are developed and used.
Allows custom searches for earthquake information using a variety of parameters. Caution: this database underrepresents earthquakes of low magnitudes, especially <2.0. This can be a useful teaching point when demonstrating/deriving the Gutenberg-Richter relationship. Also note that, particularly when searching for earthquakes in a small area or over a short span of time, earthquake swarms (say those associated with a major quake) may distort the Gutenberg-Richter relationship—which, of course, could be another useful teaching point.
Allows custom searches for earthquake information using a variety of parameters, but specifically for southern California. See cautions above, although this database gives more complete counts in the <2.0 magnitude range.
"...the chance of having one or more magnitude 6.7 or larger earthquakes in the California area over the next 30 years is greater than 99%. Such quakes can be deadly, as shown by the 1989 magnitude 6.9 Loma Prieta and the 1994 magnitude 6.7 Northridge earthquakes. The likelihood of at least one even more powerful quake of magnitude 7.5 or greater in the next 30 years is 46%—such a quake is most likely to occur in the southern half of the State. Building codes, earthquake insurance, and emergency planning will be affected by these new results, which highlight the urgency to prepare now for the powerful quakes that are inevitable in California's future."