InTeGrate Modules and Courses >Coastal Processes, Hazards and Society > Student Materials > Module 12: Sea level rise policy > Assessing Costs and Benefits > Combining Strategies
InTeGrate's Earth-focused Modules and Courses for the Undergraduate Classroom
showLearn More
These materials are part of a collection of classroom-tested modules and courses developed by InTeGrate. The materials engage students in understanding the earth system as it intertwines with key societal issues. The collection is freely available and ready to be adapted by undergraduate educators across a range of courses including: general education or majors courses in Earth-focused disciplines such as geoscience or environmental science, social science, engineering, and other sciences, as well as courses for interdisciplinary programs.
Explore the Collection »
show Download
The student materials are available for offline viewing below. Downloadable versions of the instructor materials are available from this location on the instructor materials pages. Learn more about using the different versions of InTeGrate materials »

Download a PDF of all web pages for the student materials

Download a zip file that includes all the web pages and downloadable files from the student materials

For the Instructor

These student materials complement the Coastal Processes, Hazards and Society Instructor Materials. If you would like your students to have access to the student materials, we suggest you either point them at the Student Version which omits the framing pages with information designed for faculty (and this box). Or you can download these pages in several formats that you can include in your course website or local Learning Managment System. Learn more about using, modifying, and sharing InTeGrate teaching materials.

Combining Strategies

The above discussion shows how cost-benefit analysis can be used to compare individual strategies for preparing for sea level rise and related coastal hazards. However, the most cost-effective option is often not a single strategy, but a combination of synergistic strategies. For example, when used alone, breakwaters or artificial reefs can be used to slow coastal erosion, but are not effective at preventing flooding due to sea level rise and storm surge. However, these strategies can be combined with other complementary strategies – such as levees or beach/dune reconstruction – that can mitigate sea level rise and storm surge flooding but are not as good at slowing coastal erosion. Combining strategies can also be an effective way to meet multiple design goals. For example, including a waterfront park in a plan for managed retreat can reduce the exposure of coastal infrastructure to flooding while also fulfilling other goals, such as creating new space for recreation and environmental restoration.


Activate Your Learning

This exercise is not for credit but you are required to understand this material for the formal assessments in this module.

Stakeholders in Ventura, California have chosen to combine several strategies for reducing erosion at Surfer's Point.

Read this NOAA article about their choices, then answer the following questions:

Question 1 - Multiple Choice

According to the article, which of the following decisions by the city increased erosion?

a. Building a bike path
b. Erecting a sea wall
c. Armoring the point with boulders
d. Constructing the fairgrounds

Question 2 - Multiple Choice

Which of the following was NOT one of the stakeholders mentioned in the article?

a. City of Ventura
b. California Environmental Protection Agency
c. County Fairgrounds
d. California Department of Parks and Recreation
e. California Coastal Commission
f. Ventura Chapter of Surfrider Foundation

Question 3 - Multiple Choice

The erosion reduction plan that stakeholders agreed to in 2001 combined several strategies. Which of the following strategies were part of the plan?

a. Managed retreat
b. Installing rip rap
c. Restoring beach habitat
d. Beach re-nourishment
e. All of the above
f. A, B, and D
g. A, C, and D

Question 4 - Multiple Choice

The 1995 working group failed to agree to a plan in part because the County Fairgrounds believed the project's costs would outweigh its benefits. Which cost was of greatest concern to the Fairgrounds?

a. The cost of lost parking
b. The construction costs of $3.8 million
c. The beach re-nourishment cost
d. The cost to remove a dam

Question 5 - Multiple Choice

According to the article, which of the following was NOT one of the reasons for the success of the plan?

a. The popularity of managed retreat in other communities
b. Grassroots support
c. An inclusive planning process
d. Leadership of the Surfrider Foundation

In addition to the benefits of implementing complementary strategies in one place, communities should also recognize that the types of strategies that are most beneficial will vary from place to place across the community's jurisdiction – strategies that are highly beneficial in area of the community may not be as beneficial in another, and may even be harmful. Thus, communities should consider adopting not only multiple complementary strategies in one area, but also different sets of complementary strategies for different areas. The next section discusses how communities, governments, and stakeholders can use geographic information systems to better understand how differences in the social and physical landscape across their jurisdiction may affect the suitability of these strategies from place to place.


These materials are part of a collection of classroom-tested modules and courses developed by InTeGrate. The materials engage students in understanding the earth system as it intertwines with key societal issues. The collection is freely available and ready to be adapted by undergraduate educators across a range of courses including: general education or majors courses in Earth-focused disciplines such as geoscience or environmental science, social science, engineering, and other sciences, as well as courses for interdisciplinary programs.
Explore the Collection »