Related Links
Supplement to this activity
Mineral Classification—What's in a Name?

Dave Mogk and Dexter Perkins

Montana State University, Bozeman and University of North Dakota

This activity is part of the On the Cutting Edge Exemplary Teaching Activities collection and has been reviewed by 1 other review process

This activity was selected for the On the Cutting Edge Exemplary Teaching Collection

Resources in this top level collection a) must have scored Exemplary or Very Good in all five review categories, and must also rate as "Exemplary" in at least three of the five categories. The five categories included in the peer review process are
- Scientific Accuracy
- Alignment of Learning Goals, Activities, and Assessments
- Pedagogic Effectiveness
- Robustness (usability and dependability of all components)
- Completeness of the ActivitySheet web page
For more information about the peer review process itself, please see https://serc.carleton.edu/teachearth/activity_review.html.
This activity was peer reviewed prior to publication in the Teaching Mineralogy Workbook.

This teaching activity was originally published in: Brady, J., Mogk, D. W., and Perkins, D., (editors), 1997, "Teaching Mineralogy," a workbook published by the Mineralogical Society of America, 406 pp. All teaching activities in this volume received two external peer reviews from mineralogy faculty focused on content and pedagogy, and a final review by the co-editors to comply with the publication standards of the Mineralogical Society of America.

This page first made public: Aug 7, 2006

Summary

Students derive their own scheme for identifying and naming minerals. Examples include different minerals that have the same crystal forms, and mineral species that occur with numerous forms and varieties to demonstrate the diversity of the mineral world. This exercise introduces the ambiguities encountered in classifying minerals that lead ultimately to the development of Dana's system of mineralogy.

Physical Properties, Mineralogy | College Lower (13-14), College Upper (15-16)

Expand for more detail and links to related resources

Used this activity? Share your experiences and modifications

Context

Audience

This activity is designed for an undergraduate required course in mineralogy and is generally for sophomore or junior level students.

Skills and concepts that students must have mastered

Students should have knowledge of basic chemistry and of minerals equivalent to what they would learn in an introductory geology class.

How the activity is situated in the course

This activity is a stand-alone exercise, but is part of a larger volume of classroom and laboratory activities from "Teaching Mineralogy," a workbook published by the Mineralogical Society of America, Brady, J., Mogk, D. W., and Perkins, D., (editors), 1997,406 pp. This activity is the 4th of 36 mineralogy exercises and is used at the beginning of the course after reviewing mineral identification based on physical properties and before systematically looking at groups of minerals.

Goals

Content/concepts goals for this activity

Become familiar with the most important mineral properties used for mineral identification.
Become familiar with some historical aspects of mineral science.

Higher order thinking skills goals for this activity

Practice analyzing a complex problem, synthesizing information of different sorts, and deriving a logical and practical mineral classification scheme.
Evaluate ways early mineralogists approached mineral classification.
Develop observational, descriptive, analytical, and interpretive skills.
Exercise hypothesis testing and critical thinking skills.

Other skills goals for this activity

Exercise collaborative/cooperative learning and get comfortable working in small groups.
Practice peer critiquing and evaluation.

Description of the activity/assignment

Students think about the nature of classification systems and about properties that are most useful for classifying minerals as they derive their own hierarchical scheme, or key, for identifying and naming mineral species. When finished, they read Mineralogy: A Historical Review by Robert M. Hazen and revise their classification scheme. Finally, groups trade their systematic plans and identify unknown mineral samples with them, comenting on the usefullness of the various methods.

Determining whether students have met the goals

There is no right answer, but students must be able to justify their reasons for selecting the order of criteria in their classification systems.

Students prepare critiques of their own and of other group's classification systems and the depth and insight displayed in their critiques reveals whether the activity was a success.

More information about assessment tools and techniques.

Teaching materials and tips

This assignment can be downloaded in Word (RTF) (Rich Text File 7kB Jul13 05) or pdf (Acrobat (PDF) 13kB Jul13 05) format.
A more complete description of learning objectives, suggested materials, the original assignment, reflection questions, assessment, and notes for instructors on pedagogy and teaching strategies can be found in the original exercise (Mogk, 1997) (Acrobat (PDF) 2.9MB Jul13 05)

Other Materials

This activity has supplemental information submitted as part of the InTeGrate Teaching the Methods of Geoscience workshop in June 2012.

Supporting references/URLs

Dave Mogk's Mineralogy Course Goals and Summary

Course Syllabus (Microsoft Word 33kB Feb21 06) and Course Learning Goals (Excel 26kB Feb21 06)

Dex Perkins' Mineralogy Course Summary and Goals
Mineralogy Course Syllabus
Hazen, R.M., 1984, Mineralogy: A Historical Review, Journal of Geological Education v 32, p288-298.
Brady, J., Mogk, D. W., and Perkins, D., (editors), 1997, Teaching Mineralogy, a workbook published by the Mineralogical Society of America, 406 pp.
Mineralogical Society of America - Join today!