Guided Discovery and Scoring Rubric for Petrographic Analysis of a Thin Section
This activity was selected for the On the Cutting Edge Exemplary Teaching Collection
Resources in this top level collection a) must have scored Exemplary or Very Good in all five review categories, and must also rate as “Exemplary” in at least three of the five categories. The five categories included in the peer review process are
- Scientific Accuracy
- Alignment of Learning Goals, Activities, and Assessments
- Pedagogic Effectiveness
- Robustness (usability and dependability of all components)
- Completeness of the ActivitySheet web page
For more information about the peer review process itself, please see http://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/review.html.
This page first made public: Oct 23, 2008
Skills and concepts that students must have mastered
How the activity is situated in the course
Content/concepts goals for this activity
Higher order thinking skills goals for this activity
Other skills goals for this activity
- A learning strategy is provided that demonstrates how to systematically observe and interpret a thin section;
- Students should begin to ask appropriate questions of the thin sections, and begin to seek the answers using a) all the techniques available via the petrographic microscope, b) making focused and purposeful observations, and c) making interpretations that are contextual, constrained (by known geologic relations), relevant and meaningful.
- The scientific method is used to formulate hypotheses about what minerals might be expected, and the tests are provided to confirm or reject the hypotheses; taking a Popperian approach, interpretations can be continually tested against new observations to check for validity;
- Predictions can be made based on geologic insights and reasoning;
- Sketching and photomicrographs: by sketching images of the thin sections, students must make critical observations, decide what is important and what to emphasize, and disregard "extraneous" information in the slide. Many students will have access to digital cameras; photomicrographs are also useful, but it's best to annotate the key features .
- Petrographic study should be purposeful: you should have a clear idea of what questions you are trying to answer and why: a) What is the stable mineral assemblage? b) What alteration minerals are present? c) What accessory minerals are present? How can these be used to interpret e.g. provenance, or to be used for further analysis e.g. geochronology? d) What is the history of the rock based on overprints and cross-cutting relations preserved in the rock fabric?
- Internal inconsistencies can be revealed as new evidence is brought to bear; Checks on observations and interpretations can be made by considering if the results are a) possible in Nature, b) internally consistent with known relationships, etc.
Description of the activity/assignment
Comprehensive lists of a) optical determinations, and b) textural features are provided as "cues" to the student to help focus attention on the full range of observations that could or should be made towards a comprehensive petrographic analysis of the thin section. These sheets are organized to include:
- Consideration of the geologic context of the sample: What is the geologic setting where the rock was collected? What is the rock type (if known), or at least is it igneous, sedimentary or metamorphic? This type of contextual information will help guide you to interpret what minerals are likely to be present (or excluded) in the sample
- Mineral Optics (identification of mineral phases in thin section.
- Observations at low power in plane and cross polarized light.
- Systematic characterization of the (stable) rock-forming minerals
- Identification of a) secondary or replacement minerals, and b) important accessory minerals;
- Description and Interpretation of Rock Textures
- Igneous rocks
- Clastic Sedimentary rocks
- Non-clastic Sedimentary rocks (carbonates)
- Metamorphic rocks
- Applications; can these minerals/assemblages/textures be used to determine source area, physical conditions (thermobarometry), geo- or thermochronology, and other useful geologic information?
Initially, use of these spread sheets will appear to be prescriptive. However, given the complexity observed in Nature, no single set of questions can be universally applied to all types of samples. So, the steps and observations represented in these spread sheets provide a general framework--a place to start--and the lists of optical properties and textures are meant to be a reminder to students about the types of observations that should be made. Students can use these spread sheets as a guide to make decisions about what is important and useful for the overall interpretation.
Metacognitive components of the activity
- Students derive an awareness of their own learning processes by considering "what" they are doing and "why" they are performing certain operations on the petrographic microscope.
- Students monitor their own progress by considering a) what they expect to find based on geologic contexts, b) are their observations and interpretations consistent with what can (or cannot) occur in Nature, and
- Adjust their learning strategies to accomodate new lines of evidence towards formulation of internally consistent (if not "correct") observations and interpretations of the thin section.
Metacognitive goals for this activity:The first encounter with an unknown thin section can be both confusing and overwhelming: Where do I start? What should I look for? How should I proceed? How will I know if I'm doing the right thing, and making the right observations?....
The purpose of this exercise is to "unpack" the steps taken by a master petrographer, to describe "what" observations can be made, and explain "why" these steps should be taken, what the utility or significance of the observations is, and how these observations can be appropriately interpreted (often these observations are done instantaneously in the mind of the petrographer, but in this exercise we try to explicitly outline these steps). With practice and experience these steps will become second nature. The goal of this exercise is to help students master the art of petrography so that they can independently do petrographic analysis of any rock from any context.
Assessing students' metacognitionIn the course of teaching petrography in my regular coursework, I find that I continually articulate to students (one at a time) what I am doing (and why), what I am seeing (and they may or may not be seeing the same thing), why certain relationships are to be expected or prohibited in Nature (by considering the larger geologic context). The development of these guided discovery activities is an attempt to clearly articulate to all students the steps that are routinely taken in the petrographic analysis of a thin section. The goal is to more efficiently and effectively get students past the "mechanical" stages of mineral identification and textural descriptions, and help them to begin to develop higher order thinking skills of application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation.
Determining whether students have met the goals
I emphasize the use of sketches and am beginning to use annotated digital photomicrographs in my own instruction of petrography in my classes. This requires students to focus on the most important observations and to ignore extraneous details in the thin section. Again, this really helps to reveal what the students are seeing, and what they think is significant.
By having students explicitly write their observations in this graphical form on these spreadsheets, this should provide a good measure of their understanding of the procedures of petrography, and will also provide a window into what they are seeing and thinking.
Download teaching materials and tips
- Activity Description/Assignment (Microsoft Word 44kB Oct23 08)
- Spreadsheets with Guided Discovery Questions for Petrographic Analysis of a Thin Section (Excel 1.2MB Oct23 08)
- This activity has supplemental information submitted as part of the InTeGrate Teaching the Methods of Geoscience workshop in June 2012.