Ternary Diagrams: Practice Problems
Solving Earth Science Problems with Ternary Diagrams
Plotting Data on Ternary Diagrams
Sedimentology: Sediment classification
Shepherd sediment classification ternary diagram
Provenance: Kelly Deuerling, University of Nebraska at Omaha
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Sedimentologists have their own classification scheme for sediments that is based on grain size, called the Shepherd Classification (shown at right). The Shepherd Classification is most often applied to sediments with minimal organic components or those found in an offshore environment.
Problem 1: You have taken a core sample of sediment from the Gulf of Mexico and are interested in classifying the sample based on the Shepherd Classification (see ternary at right). You run your sample through a set of sieves to separate them by grain size. After sieving, you weigh the sediments and create a table (shown to the left of the Shepherd Classification diagram). Using that data, how would you classify your sample (what name would you give the sediments) using the Shepherd Classification?
Step 0: Overlay (or construct) the grid showing equal fractions of each component.
The diagram already has a grid, so there is no need for Step 0.
Step 1: Determine the components shown on the diagram (there will be three), which apex reflects 100% of each component (and which sides of the diagram show the proportions of each component). If the sides of the diagram are not labeled, you will need to decide which side of the triangle will show percentages for each component.
Shepherd sediment classification ternary diagram
Provenance: Kelly Deuerling, University of Nebraska at Omaha
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
For the Shepherd Classification, the three components of interest are clay, silt, and sand.
- 100% clay is at the top apex (and proportions are labeled on the right side of the triangle).
- 100% silt is at the right apex of the triangle (and percentages are labeled on the bottom side of the triangle).
- 100% sand is at the left apex of the triangle (and percentages are labeled on the left side of the triangle).
- Numbers increase in a counterclockwise direction and components are labeled on each side.
Step 2. If the problem gives you more than three components, determine which components in the problem are relevant to the ternary diagram of interest. If the problem only lists the three components shown on the diagram, you can skip to step 3.
Provenance: Kelly Deuerling, University of Nebraska at Omaha
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
The sediment analysis includes
four components: gravel, sand, silt, and clay. Soil textures are classified by the grain sizes of the mineral components of the sample, which only include
sand, silt, and clay (circled on the diagram). For the rest of this problem, you can ignore gravel (crossed off in the table). For steps 3–6, you will need to know that your sample contains
35 g sand, 63 g silt, and 36 g clay.
Step 3. Normalize the data into percentages of each component. To normalize, divide the amount (weight, fraction, value, etc.) of each component by the total amount (weight, fraction, value, etc.) of all three components. Equations to normalize components:
To find the percentage of sand, divide the weight of sand by the total weight of the sample:
`% "sand" = (35 g)/((35 g + 63 g + 36 g)) " * " 100 = (35 g)/(134 g) " * " 100 = 26%`
To find the percentage of silt, divide the weight of silt by the total weight of the sample:
`% "silt" = (63 g)/((35 g + 63 g + 36 g)) " * " 100 = (63 g)/(134 g) " * " 100 = 47%`
To find the percentage of clay, divide the weight of clay by the total weight of the sample:
`% "clay" = (36 g)/((35 g + 63 g + 36 g)) " * " 100 = (36 g)/(50g) " * " 100 = 27%`
Notice that `% "sand" + % "silt" + % "clay" = 26% + 47% + 27% = 100%`
Step 4: Draw a line that represents the proportion of one end-member component at the appropriate percentage and so that it is parallel to the side opposite the apex, representing 100% of that end-member. In some cases, you may have to approximate (interpolate) the location of the line for percentages between those that are labeled.
Let's start with sand (see
step 4a for other components). Note that lines parallel to the right side of the triangle and numbers along the left side of the diagram represent the proportion of sand. Above, you calculated that there was 26% sand in your sediment sample, so you will need to draw a line that intersects the left side of the triangle at 26% sand and is parallel to the right side (purple dashed line).
Provenance: Kelly Deuerling, University of Nebraska at Omaha
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Step 4a: Repeat the above process for the other two components. Your lines should intersect at a single point representing the sample composition.
For this diagram, lines parallel to the left side of the triangle (and numbers along the bottom side) represent proportions of silt. You calculated that 47% of your sample was made up of silt, so find the point on the bottom side of the diagram that represents 47% silt. Then draw (or sketch in) a line parallel to the left side of the triangle (red dotted line).
Provenance: Kelly Deuerling, University of Nebraska at Omaha
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Finally, to plot clay, note that lines parallel to the bottom side of the triangle (and numbers along the right side) correspond to proportions of clay. In step 3 you calculated that 27% of your sample was clay, so, you find the point on the right side of the diagram that represents 27% silt and draw a line that intersects the left side of the triangle at 27% silt and parallel to the bottom side of the diagram (yellow dashed and dotted line)
Provenance: Kelly Deuerling, University of Nebraska at Omaha
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Step 5: Plot the normalized data as a single point.
The sample composition is represented where the lines cross. When the lines in the images above have been removed, the green star is plotted as the composition of the sediment described above.
Provenance: Slightly modified figure from Kelly Deuerling, University of Nebraska at Omaha. Plotting lines have been removed leaving only star
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Step 6: Interpret the data plotted on the diagram.
The sample plots in the field outlined by the triangle in the center; the sediment would be classified as sand-silt-clay.
Mineralogy: Plotting pyroxene compositions
Provenance: Ryan Kerrigan, University of Pittsburgh-Johnstown
Reuse: This item is in the public domain and maybe reused freely without restriction.
Many mineral groups that exhibit solid solution (e.g., feldspar, pyroxene, amphibole, etc.) can be plotted on a ternary diagram with respect to three main components to differentiate between different mineral species.
Problem 2: You have analyzed pyroxene in an igneous rock sample that you collected for your senior thesis. You are interested to know what type of pyroxene is present in your sample, which can give you information about the tectonic setting, pressure, and temperatures at which the igneous rock crystallized. Your chemical data (collected on the electron microprobed) is shown (as weight percent of oxides found in pyroxene) in the table with the figure at right. The diagram in the figure (right) is a ternary diagram that can be used to plot pyroxene compositions.
Note: The white spaces on this diagram do not have any fields labeled. That is because any data that does not plot in the gray areas on this ternary diagram is not a pyroxene.
Pyroxene compositions are dependent on the crystalline structure of pyroxene molecules. There are two sites within the structure of pyroxene that can accommodate ions with a 2+ charge (Ca, Mg, and Fe all have 2+ charges and bond with one oxygen). Only one of those sites can accommodate CaO (or FeO or MgO), so if CaO is present, it occupies most of those sites (if not, those sites are filled with varying amounts of FeO and MgO). Other sites can only accommodate FeO and MgO. Pyroxenes that contain CaO are called clinopyroxenes; those that only contain Feo and MgO are called orthopyroxenes.
Determine the type of pyroxene (name) in your igneous rock using the pyroxene diagram and table of oxide compositions shown in the figure above.
Step 0: Overlay (or construct) the grid showing equal fractions of each component.
Provenance: Updated copy of ternary diagram made by Ryan Kerrigan (University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown) - grid added
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
This diagram has "tick marks" showing 10% increments along each side, but the numbers and grid are missing. You will need to construct a grid by connecting the tick marks on either side of the diagram to make a grid so you can plot your compositions.
Step 1: Determine the components shown on the diagram (there will be three), which apex reflects 100% of each component (and which sides of the diagram show the proportions of each component). If the sides of the diagram are not labeled, you will need to decide which side of the triangle will show percentages for each component.
For pyroxene, the three components of interest are CaO, MgO, and FeO. On this diagram, the apices are labeled, but the sides of the triangle are not, so you will need to decide how to label the grid you constructed in
Step 0. The figure below shows them labeled, increasing in a clockwise direction, but you could just as easily label them in a counterclockwise direction.
Provenance: Updated copy of ternary diagram made by Ryan Kerrigan (University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown) - grid added
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
- 100% CaO is at the top apex (and the figure here shows percentages labeled in purple on the left side of the triangle).
- 100% FeO is at the right apex of the triangle (and the figure here shows percentages labeled in red on the right side of the triangle).
- 100% MgO is at the left apex of the triangle (and the figure here shows percentages labeled in blue on the bottom side of the triangle).
- Numbers increase in a clockwise direction and components are labeled on each side.
Step 2. If the problem gives you more than three components, determine which components in the problem are relevant to the ternary diagram of interest. If the problem only lists the three components shown on the diagram, you can skip to step 3.
Provenance: Updated copy of ternary diagram made by Ryan Kerrigan (University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown) - grid added
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
The table of weight percent (wt%) has data that you do not need (SiO
2, Al
2O
3, and MnO), so you can ignore those components of pyroxene for this problem (they are crossed off in the figure to the right). You will only be dealing with the components on this diagram:
CaO, MgO and FeO. For steps 3–6, you will need to know that your pyroxene contains
18.31 wt% CaO, 14.31 wt% MgO, and 12.06 wt% FeO.
Step 3. Normalize the data into percentages of each component. To normalize, divide the amount (weight, fraction, value, etc.) of each component by the total amount (weight, fraction, value, etc.) of all three components. Double-check rounding errors to make sure all three components add up to 100%.
Divide each end-member's (CaO or MgO or FeO) wt% by the sum of all the end-member components (CaO+MgO+FeO).
`CaO \%=(18.31/(18.31+14.31+12.06))*100=(18.31/44.68)*100=41 \%`
`MgO \% = (14.31/(18.31+14.31+12.06))*100=(14.31/44.68)*100=32 \%`
`FeO \% = (12.06/(18.31+14.31+12.06))*100=(12.06/44.68)*100=27 \%`
Note that `% "Ca0" + % "MgO" + % "FeO" = 41\% + 32\% + 27\% = 100\%`
Step 4: Draw a line that represents the proportion of one end-member component at the appropriate percentage and so that it is parallel to the side opposite the apex representing 100% of that end-member. In some cases, you may have to approximate (interpolate) the location of the line for percentages between those that are labeled.
Let's start with CaO (see
Step 3 for other components). Note that horizontal lines (those parallel to the bottom side of the triangle) and numbers along the left side of the diagram represent the proportion of CaO. Above, you calculated that there was 41% CaO in your soil sample, so you will need to draw a line that intersects the left side of the triangle at 41% CaO and that is parallel to the bottom side (dashed line labeled CaO = 41%).
Provenance: Updated copy of ternary diagram made by Ryan Kerrigan (University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown) - grid added
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Step 4a: Repeat the above process for the other two components. Your lines should intersect at a single point, representing the sample composition.
Provenance: Updated copy of ternary diagram made by Ryan Kerrigan (University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown) - grid added
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
For this diagram, lines parallel to the right side of the triangle (and numbers along the bottom) represent proportions of MgO. You calculated that 32% of your sample was made up of MgO, so approximate the point between 30 and 40 on the bottom of the diagram that represents 32% MgO. Then draw (or sketch in) a line parallel to the right side of the triangle (see dashed line labeled MgO=32%).
Provenance: Updated copy of ternary diagram made by Ryan Kerrigan (University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown) - grid added
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Finally, to plot FeO, note that lines parallel to the left side of the triangle (and numbers along the right side) correspond to proportions of FeO. In Step 3 you calculated that 27% of your sample was made up of FeO, so you will need to approximate the point between 20 and 30 that represents 27% FeO and draw a line that intersects the right side of the triangle at 27% FeO and that is parallel to the left side of the diagram (see dashed line labeled FeO = 27%). A red star has been placed where all three lines cross
Step 5. Plot the normalized data as a single point. Determine where your lines cross and place the point there.
When all three lines are placed on the plot, they cross at a single point, shown as a red star below.
Provenance: Updated copy of ternary diagram made by Ryan Kerrigan (University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown) - grid added
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Step 6: Interpret the data plotted on the diagram.
Based on the data and the field that it plots in, the pyroxene you analyzed would be classified as
augite, a clinopyroxene.
Provenance: Ryan Kerrigan, University of Pittsburgh-Johnstown
Reuse: This item is in the public domain and maybe reused freely without restriction.
Interpreting Points Plotted on Ternary Diagrams
Petrology: Extracting and interpreting plotted rock compositions
Problem 3. A colleague collected some igneous plutonic (coarse-grained/intrusive) rocks (with no feldspathoid) in a field area for a project you are working on. This colleague has plotted the rocks on the ternary diagram below (also known as the IUGS [International Union of Geological Sciences] or Streckheisen diagram) so that you can classify the rocks. The colleague has also color coded the rocks by age: red circle = oldest; yellow square = middle; and blue triangle = youngest. Based on your colleague's analysis, the rocks collected are classified as quartz monzonite (red, oldest), granodiorite (yellow), and granite (blue, youngest).
You are interested in better characterizing the mineral composition of these rocks, so you can say something about how the mineralogy evolved during crystallization. As a result, you want to know how much of each mineral on this diagram is present in the collected rocks. Use the information below to determine the relative percentages of minerals.
Three rocks are plotted on the IUGS QAP diagram for the classification of plutonic igneous rocks
Provenance: Modified from the IUGS (or Streckeisen) QAPF diagram used to classify plutonic igneous rocks. This version omits the "F" and only has Q-A-P.
Reuse: This item is in the public domain and maybe reused freely without restriction.
Step 0: Overlay (or construct) the grid showing equal fractions of each component.
This diagram has no markings to tell you where to put the grid lines.
Provenance: Jennifer Wenner, University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Begin by marking 10 equal increments on each side (you can label them with percentages as in the image to the left).
Connect lines parallel to each side and connecting marks you made to create a grid.
Provenance: Jennifer Wenner, University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Step 1: Determine the components shown on the diagram (there will be three) and which apex reflects 100% of each component.
For plutonic rocks (with quartz), the three components of interest are quartz (Q), alkali feldspar (A), and plagioclase (P). On this diagram, the apices were labeled, but the sides of the triangle were not. In the image below, the sides are labeled increasing in a clockwise direction, so we will use that convention in the rest of the problem.
Provenance: Jennifer Wenner, University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
- 100% quartz (Q) is at the top apex (and the figure here shows percentages labeled in purple on the left side of the triangle).
- 100% plagioclase (P) is at the right apex of the triangle (and the figure here shows percentages labeled in red on the right side of the triangle).
- 100% alkali feldspar is at the left apex of the triangle (and the figure here shows percentages labeled in blue on the bottom side of the triangle).
Step 2: Draw three lines through each point and parallel to grid lines to determine the relative abundances of each end member.
Let's begin with the proportion of
quartz in each of the rocks plotted here. Quartz percentages are represented by the horizontal lines on the grid. Draw a line through each point of interest and parallel to the bottom side of the triangle. Read the percentages of each rock from the left side of the diagram
Provenance: Jennifer Wenner, University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
:
- for the red circle (quartz monzonite): 10% quartz.
- for the yellow square (granodiorite): 25% quartz.
- for the blue triangle (granite): 40% quartz.
Next let's determine the proportion of plagioclase in the rocks plotted on the diagram. Plagioclase percentages are represented by the lines parallel to the left side of the triangle. Draw a line through each point of interest and parallel to the left side of the triangle. Read the percentages of plagioclase in each rock from the right side of the diagram:
Provenance: Jennifer Wenner, University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
- for the red circle (quartz monzonite): 65% plagioclase.
- for the yellow square (granodiorite): 50% plagioclase.
- for the blue triangle (granite): 35% plagioclase.
Provenance: Jennifer Wenner, University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Finally, let's determine the proportion of alkali feldspar in these rocks. Alkali feldspar percentages are represented by the lines parallel to the right side of the triangle. Draw a line through each point of interest and parallel to the right side of the triangle. Read the percentages for alkali feldspar in each of the rocks from the bottom of the diagram: for all compositions:
25% alkali feldspar.
Step 3: Record the percentages of each end member component, confirming that they sum to 100%.
The compositions of your three rocks are as follows:
- for the red circle (quartz monzonite): 10% quartz + 65% plagioclase + 25% alkali feldspar = 100%.
- for the yellow square (granodiorite): 25% quartz + 50% plagioclase + 25% alkali feldspar = 100%.
- for the blue triangle (granite): 40% quartz + 35% plagioclase + 25% alkali feldspar = 100%.
Step 4: Interpret your findings. Use what you have learned to answer the question posed.
You are interested in the changes in mineralogy through time. You can observe that the amount of alkali feldspar stays the same through time. However, the amount of quartz increases and the amount of plagioclase decreases through time (from red through yellow to blue).
Provenance: From Wikipedia Commons
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Your samples are becoming more quartz-rich and depleted in plagioclase. This change through time—enrichment in quartz and depletion in plagioclase—is seen in many igneous intrusions, including the igneous intrusions that make up Yosemite National Park (pictured to the right). As fractional crystallization progresses, Ca-rich plagioclase (and other "mafic components") crystallizes early, enriching the magma in other elements (like the alkalies and SiO
2). The magma becomes more quartz (SiO
2) rich through time.
Environmental geochemistry: Water quality
Geochemists often look at ions (or ionic groups) dissolved in freshwater to determine whether the water is safe, the source of the water, or how water chemistry changes spatially and through time. Freshwater commonly contains the dissolved cationsCations are ions, or charged particles with a positive charge. Ca+2, Mg+2, Na+, and K+ and the anions Anions are ions, or charged particles with a negative charge. or anionic groupsAnionic groups are a group of atoms with a negative charge. Cl-, HCO3-, SO4-2. Major ion composition (cations and anions/anionic groups) can be plotted on ternary diagrams to characterize differences in chemistry, safety of the water, and sometimes the source of the water.
Provenance: Kelly Deuerling, University of Nebraska at Omaha
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Problem 4: Watersheds in ice-free areas of western Greenland get their freshwater from either ice melt (proglacial) or precipitation (nonglacial). Proglacial and nonglacial watersheds have distinct chemical compositions; that is, the anionic compositions are different for each type of water produced. The ternary diagram for differentiating proglacial and nonglacial watersheds is shown in the ternary to the right with samples from proglacial (blue triangles) and nonglacial (red circles) watersheds plotted.
Provenance: Kelly Deuerling, University of Nebraska at Omaha
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Use these data to answer the following questions:
a) Which anion (Cl-, SO4-2, or HCO3-) is most abundant in proglacial watersheds?
b) Which anion (Cl-, SO4-2, or HCO3-) is most abundant in nonglacial watersheds?
c) How could you use the information above to determine whether water in another watershed is proglacial or nonglacial?
Step 0: Overlay (or construct) the grid showing equal fractions of each component.
This diagram already has a grid with labels, so you do not need to complete Step 0.
Step 1: Determine the components shown on the diagram (there will be three) and which apex reflects 100% of each component.
Provenance: Kelly Deuerling, University of Nebraska at Omaha
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
For water chemistry, the three components of interest are
SO4-2 (sulfate),
Cl- (chloride), and
HCO3- (bicarbonate). On this diagram, the apices are labeled. In the image below, the sides are labeled increasing in a counterclockwise direction, so we will use that convention in the rest of the problem.
- 100% SO4-2 is at the top apex (and the figure here shows percentages labeled on the right side of the triangle).
- 100% Cl- is at the right apex of the triangle (and the figure here shows percentages labeled on the bottom side of the triangle).
- 100% HCO3- is at the left apex of the triangle (and the figure here shows percentages labeled on the left side of the triangle).
Step 2: Draw three lines through each point and parallel to grid lines to determine the relative abundances of each end member.
Because we are interested in the ranges of compositions for each type of watershed, we will determine the range of compositions for proglacial (blue triangles) and nonglacial (red circles) watersheds.
Provenance: ternary originally uploaded by Kelly Deuerling, University of Nebraska at Omaha, I added the ranges for SO4
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Let's begin with the proportion of
SO4-2 for the parabolic dunes plotted here.
Sulfate percentages are represented by the horizontal lines on the grid. For each group of samples, draw a line through the point with the lowest
SO4-2 and through the point with the highest
SO4-2, showing the range of compositions for that group of samples.
- For nonglacial watersheds, the SO4-2 composition ranges from 48% to 74%.
- For proglacial watersheds, the SO4-2 composition ranges from 9% to 17%.
Provenance: ternary originally uploaded by Kelly Deuerling, University of Nebraska at Omaha, I added the ranges for Cl
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Next let's determine the proportion of
Cl- in the rocks plotted on the diagram.
Chloride percentages are represented by the lines parallel to the left side of the triangle. For each group of samples, draw a line through the point with the lowest
Cl- and through the point with the highest
Cl-, showing the range of compositions for that group of samples:
- For nonglacial watersheds, the Cl- composition ranges from 9% to 15%.
- For proglacial watersheds, the Cl- composition ranges from 1% to 3%.
Provenance: ternary originally uploaded by Kelly Deuerling, University of Nebraska at Omaha, I added the ranges for HCO3
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Finally, let's determine the proportion of
HCO3- in the rocks plotted on the diagram.
Bicarbonate percentages are represented by the lines parallel to the right side of the triangle. For each group of samples, draw a line through the point with the lowest
HCO3- and through the point with the highest
HCO3-, showing the range of compositions for that group of samples:
- For nonglacial watersheds, the HCO3- composition ranges from 11% to 43%.
- For proglacial watersheds, the HCO3- composition ranges from about 80% to 90%.
Step 3: Record the percentages of each end member component, confirming that they sum to 100%.
This interpretation is a bit more complicated since we determined the range for each group of samples. We can still make sure that values for each end of the range sum to 100%.
- For nonglacial watersheds:
- on one end: 74% SO4-2 + 15% Cl- + 11% HCO3- =100%
- on the other end: 48% SO4-2 + 9% Cl- + 43% HCO3- =100%
- For proglacial watersheds
- on one end: 9% SO4-2 + 1% Cl- + 90% HCO3- =100%
- on the other end: 17% SO4-2 + 3% Cl- + 80% HCO3- =100%
Step 4: Interpret your findings. Use what you have learned to answer the questions posed.
a) Which anion (Cl-, SO4-2, or HCO3-) is most abundant in proglacial watersheds?
Based on the information above, proglacial watersheds have the highest percentages of HCO3-, with somewhere in the range of 80–90%.
b) Which anion (Cl-, SO4-2, or HCO3-) is most abundant in nonglacial watersheds?
Based on the information above, nonglacial watersheds have the highest percentages of SO4-2, with somewhere in the range of 48–74%.
c) How could you use the information above to determine whether water in another watershed is proglacial or nonglacial?
Based on the percentages, watersheds with proglacial water have high amounts of bicarbonate, whereas the water in nonglacial watersheds is rich in sulfate. So, determining the amounts of these anionic groups in freshwater systems near glaciers could help to determine the source of the water.
A More Complex Example: Reading and Plotting
Geomorphology: Dune types
There are many variables that can influence the formation of sand dunes, including topography, climate, humidity, vegetation, availability of sand, and wind strength and direction. The interplay of many of these variables produces different shapes and forms of sand dunes. Geomorphologists use the ternary diagram below to characterize the relationship of dune forms (morphology), vegetative cover, supply of sand, and the strength of the wind.
Problem 5: The photo of the dunes shown in the left portion of the figure below was taken in Oregon Dunes National Recreation Area. In the area near the coastal forest, the interplay of variables that control dune shape is reflected by the location of the blue dot on the dune morphology diagram on the right side of the diagram below. Given the placement of the blue dot, most of the dunes near the coastal forest in Oregon Dunes are classified as parabolic dunes. Your first job is to determine the conditions that produce the parabolic dunes shown in the photo by determining the proportions of the end-members.
Provenance: Oregon dunes picture: https://pixabay.com/photos/sand-dunes-dunes-national-park-52902/ Dune morphology modified from Hack, Geographical Review, 1941
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Additionally, geomorphologists might want to know how changing one variable might alter the types of dunes that would be present, and so might consider questions like: what would happen if we logged the coastal forest (and reduced vegetation)? So your second job is to plot a new point that reflects reduced vegetation (more information in the question below). Let's use the dune morphology diagram to think about both the conditions that are currently present (the blue dot) and what might happen if we changed the amount of vegetation.
This question involves interpreting the plotted blue point, and plotting a new point that reflects less vegetation. So, the steps outlined below are not exactly what we've been using above. The steps are notated with "interpreting" and "plotting" so that you know where those steps come from.
Let's start by figuring out: What conditions are currently present to produce parabolic dunes (blue dot) near the coastal forest in Oregon Dunes National Recreation Area? (interpreting the plotted point)
Step 0 (interpreting/plotting): Overlay (or construct) the grid showing equal fractions of each component.
This diagram shows where 0%, 50%, and 100% are for each end member, with end members labeled along the side and showing which way they increase with an arrow.
You will need to label the other increments of 10 on each side and connect those lines to create a grid.
Step 1 (interpreting/plotting): Determine the components shown on the diagram (there will be three) and which apex reflects 100% of each component.
For dune morphology, the three components of interest are strength of the wind (Wind), aggressiveness of vegetation (Vegetation), and supply of sand available (Supply of Sand). On this diagram, the apices were labeled. In the image below, the sides are labeled, increasing in a counterclockwise direction, so we will use that convention in the rest of the problem.
- 100% Wind is at the top apex (and the figure here shows percentages labeled in purple on the right side of the triangle).
- 100% Vegetation is at the right apex of the triangle (and the figure here shows percentages labeled in blue on the bottom side of the triangle).
- 100% Supply of Sand is at the left apex of the triangle (and the figure here shows percentages labeled in red on the left side of the triangle).
Step 2 (interpreting): Draw three lines through each point and parallel to grid lines to determine the relative abundances of each end-member.
Let's begin with the proportion of
Wind for the parabolic dunes plotted here. Wind strength percentages are represented by the horizontal lines on the grid. Draw a line through the point of interest and parallel to the bottom side of the triangle. Read the percentages from the right side of the diagram:
20% wind.
Provenance: Jennifer Wenner, University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Next let's determine the proportion of Vegetation in the rocks plotted on the diagram. Vegetation percentages are represented by the lines parallel to the left side of the triangle. Draw a line through each point of interest and parallel to the left side of the triangle. Read the percentages from the bottom of the diagram: 34% vegetation
Provenance: Jennifer Wenner, University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Provenance: Jennifer Wenner, University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Finally, let's determine the proportion of
Supply of Sand in these rocks. Supply of Sand percentages are represented by the lines parallel to the right side of the triangle. Draw a line through each point of interest and parallel to the right side of the triangle. Read the percentages from the left side of the diagram:
46% Supply of Sand.
Step 3 (interpreting): Record the percentages of each end member component, confirming that they sum to 100%.
The parabolic dunes of Oregon Dunes National Recreational Area as follows: 20% Wind + 34% vegetation + 46% sand supply = 100%.
Next, let's think about: what would happen if we logged the coastal forest and reduced the vegetation present in this area? (plotting a new point) For the purposes of this question we know that the vegetation is reduced (let's say vegetation was reduced to 30% of its original value, and it now plots at 10% on this diagram). The wind conditions are probably not going to change significantly, so let's say that number doesn't change. With that information, plot a new point that represents conditions and determine the type of dune that would be present after logging.
Note: We have already done steps 0 and 1 for plotting above.
Step 4 (plotting step 3). Normalize the data into percentages of each component so they sum to 100%.
The question above actually only gives us information about the vegetation and the wind:
- Vegetation for this new plot = 10% vegetation (see question above)
- Wind for this new point = 20% wind (see Step 2 above)
We know that the totals must normalize to 100%, so we can figure out the value for "sand supply" by subtracting what we have from 100%:
- 100% total - 10% wind - 20% wind = 70% sand supply.
Step 5 (plotting step 4): Draw a line that represents the proportion of one end-member component at the appropriate percentage and so that it is parallel to the side opposite the apex representing 100% of that end-member. In some cases, you may have to approximate (interpolate) the location of the line for percentages between those that are labeled.
Let's start with wind (see
Step 4 for other components). Note that lines parallel to the bottom side of the triangle and numbers along the right side of the triangle represent the proportion of
wind. Above, you calculated that there was 20% wind for this area, so you will need to draw a line that intersects the right side of the triangle at 20% wind and is parallel to the bottom side (see bold purple line).
Provenance: Jennifer Wenner, University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Step 5a (plotting Step 4): Repeat the above process for the other two components. Your lines should intersect at a single point representing the sample composition.
For this diagram, lines parallel to the left side of the triangle (and numbers along the bottom side) represent proportions of
vegetation. The information above indicates that vegetation makes up 10% of the newly logged ecosystem, so find the point on the bottom side of the diagram that represents
10% vegetation. Then draw (or sketch in) a line parallel to the left side of the triangle (bold blue line).
Provenance: Jennifer Wenner, University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Finally, to plot sand supply, note that lines parallel to the right side of the triangle (and numbers along the left side) correspond to sand supply proportions in this system. In step 4 above, you calculated that sand supply constituted 70% of the system, so, find the point on the left side of the diagram that represents 70% sand supply and draw a line parallel to the right side of the triangle (bold red line)
Provenance: Jennifer Wenner, University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Step 6: Plot the normalized data as a single point.
The new conditions described above can be plotted where all three lines cross in the example above. When the lines in the images above have been removed, the orange star represents the conditions present when vegetation has been reduced significantly.
Provenance: Jennifer Wenner, University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Step 7 (interpreting/plotting Step 6): Interpret the data plotted on the diagram. Use what you have learned to answer the questions posed.
Part 1 (reading the point): Based on your interpretation, the conditions that produce the parabolic dunes in Oregon Dunes National Recreational area are 20% wind + 34% vegetation + 46% sand supply.
Part 2 (plotting a new point with less vegetation): Based on the newly plotted data with about 30% of the original vegetation, your new conditions (orange star) plot in the field for transverse dunes. Therefore, you can conclude that logging this area would likely change the dune morphology from parabolic to transverse dunes.
Next Steps
TAKE THE QUIZ!!
I think I'm competent with ternary diagrams and I am ready to take the quiz! This link takes you to WAMAP. If your instructor has not given you instructions about WAMAP, you may not have to take the quiz.
Or you can go back to the Ternary Diagrams explanation page.