Initial Publication Date: August 16, 2024

Correlation - Practice Problems
Solving Earth Science problems using r2 values

This module is undergoing classroom implementation with the Math Your Earth Science Majors Need project. The module is available for public use, but it will likely be revised after classroom testing.

Conceptual Understanding

The first two problems on this practice problems page focus on examining the strength and direction of the relationship between the two variables, x and y.

Problem 1: Assume the following scatter plots display data from different rivers around the world. The x-axis represents river width (m) and the y-axis represents river depth (m). Order the following river width vs. depth scatter plots from the weakest correlation to the strongest correlation.



Problem 2: We have experienced how air temperature can change based on where you are in the world and also the time of year, but how correlated are winter temperatures and distance from the equator (latitude)? Or distance from Greenwich, England (longitude)? In the figure below, what is the direction of the correlation between January temperature and latitude (0° is the equator)? In comparison to January temperature and longitude, what is the strength (stronger, weaker, or no correlation) of the correlation between January temperature and latitude (0° is the equator)?



Diving into data sets

The next couple problems include small datasets of geoscience phenomena for you to practice assessing the relationship between two variables and calculating r2.

Problem 3: In many urban areas in the Northeastern United States, stream water specific conductivity (a temperature-standardized measure of the dissolved ions, including salts, in water) has been increasing over time, likely as a result of increased salt use on winter roads. In this example, we will test the hypothesis that specific conductivity values can be explained by the relationship between conductivity values and land use in the watershed (percent impervious surface in the watershed) by answering the following question: Given the data below, what percent of the variation in specific conductivity can be explained by the linear relationship between conductivity and percent impervious surface in the watershed?
24x tmyn pp spc data.csv
sitepercent_developedspecific_conductivity
17.37176.42
22.85138.75
315.07243.95
419.12605.45
57.02278.86
640.741038.53
716.78426.79
810.29325.45


Download data (175bytes)
(last updated 2024-06-04 15:45:24)


Problem 4: The magnitude, location, and depth of an earthquake (and overlying soil conditions!) all determine how widely and strongly any particular earthquake can be felt, but what is the relationship between those variables and what we feel on the surface? Specifically, use the table below to first plot the amount of shaking and the depth of the hypocenter, then calculate the r2 value, and lastly describe the relationship between the amount of shaking felt at the surface and the depth of an earthquake hypocenter? In this example, we will look at all magnitude 6.1 earthquakes that occurred between 1/1/2024 and 6/1/2024. To quantify the amount of shaking, we will use the USGS Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) Scale, which assigns intensities as Roman numerals and is based on observed effects.

EQK_example.csv
RegionDepth (km)Shaking felt (MMI scale)
Pagan Region, Northern Mariana Islands1844
Taxisco, Guatemala905
Kermadec Islands, New Zealand134
Minami-sōma, Japan294
Hualien City, Taiwan97
Hualien City, Taiwan108
Banjar, Indonesia555
Fakfak, Indonesia136
Luganville, Vanuatu406


Download data (323bytes)
(last updated 2024-06-21 07:57:20)


Problem 5: The geochemistry of igneous rocks can often give us interesting information about the geological history and magmatic processes of a volcanic region. In this example, from Chen et al. (2020), the amount of lithium in a volcanic sample is interpreted to represent increased changed in magma composition. Use the provided data, create a scatter plot, and answer the following question: What does the r2 value tell you about the relationship between crustal thickness and lithium content of magma?

Crust_thickness_Li_dataset.csv
Li (ppm)Crustal Thickness (km)
6.418
5.819
4.627
6.128
5.930
835
7.439
8.838
941

Crust_thickness_Li_dataset from Chen et al. 2020
Download data (101bytes)
(last updated 2024-08-14 15:39:44)


Next steps

TAKE THE QUIZ!!

I think I'm competent with correlation and I am ready to take the quiz! This link takes you to WAMAP. If your instructor has not given you instructions about WAMAP, you may not have to take the quiz.

Or you can go back to the Correlation explanation page.