Jennifer Dechaine: Using Soils, Systems, and Society at Central Washington University
About this Course
A methods course intended for pre-service K–8 teachers.
13
students
Two 110-minute lecture sessions
weekly
No lab
Regional comprehensive
university
Syllabus (Acrobat (PDF) 152kB Sep16 15)
This 4-credit course is part of the Elementary Education Major and Science Education K–8 Minor, to be taken by students already admitted to the Teacher Certification Program. Course content and activities are designed to help students experience the process of science, as well as how to facilitate children's learning using scientific inquiry in grades K–8. Topics covered include science and engineering practices, Next Generation Science Standards, and grade-level appropriate content, materials, and techniques. Students apply lesson planning, instruction, assessment, and reflection to teaching science by designing an instructional sequence and teaching it in a field practicum at a local elementary school.
Course Goals:
- Experience science and engineering practices and develop science knowledge, skills, and values
- Design learning environments that support science and engineering practices, collaboration, and content integration
- Facilitate and guide inquiry experiences for elementary (K–8) learners
- Assess and evaluate student learning and teaching effectiveness
- Engage in continual professional growth
Course Content
This is the only science teaching methods course in the Elementary Education Major. The course focuses on teaching pedagogy, and limited science content is taught in the context of methods. Students are encouraged to complete relevant science courses (e.g., Geology 101) as part of their general education requirements prior to taking this course, but science content and pedagogy knowledge are highly variable among students. Students may be in their first to final year of the Teacher Certification Program (typically sophomore-senior undergraduates). Topics are organized around the three dimensions of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS): science and engineering practices (e.g., observing and questioning), disciplinary core ideas (e.g., Earth science), and crosscutting concepts (e.g., systems). In the first part of the course, students build their own science knowledge, skills, and values by experiencing a variety of science and engineering lessons, culminating in the presentation of an independent student-led research project. They apply their learning in the second part of the course by planning, teaching, assessing, and reflecting on an instructional sequence that they teach at a local elementary school.
A Success Story in Building Student Engagement
What I like best about our module is that it can be adapted to any science content. My course includes a field practicum at a local elementary school, and what my students teach changes depending on grade level, classroom, and time of year. For the module pilot, we taught at the annual fifth grade outdoors camp, so my students developed Kits (Unit 4) that focused on local environmental science topics (e.g., ecosystems) within systems and society (without required inclusion of soils). It has always been challenging for my students to think about their Kits in the context of entire systems, but I think our module's emphasis on systems helped them make those connections—this year's lessons were the best ones I have had in the six years I have taught the class. That being said, my students still struggled with writing lessons that developed systems thinking in their students (the fifth graders). The current version of our module includes concept mapping for even more practice in systems thinking, and I am excited to see how this improves my students' Kits the next time I teach the class.
My Experience Teaching with InTeGrate Materials
We designed this module around the Kit, because it is only becoming more important for future teachers to practice designing and teaching locally-relevant science and connecting it to Earth and social systems. My students taught their Kits to fifth graders at a local elementary school. Soils content was not appropriate for all groups so I shifted the focus of the Kits to systems and society; this flexibility is what I most appreciate about our module.
Relationship of InTeGrate Materials to my Course
My course is over a 10-week quarter. The module was integrated throughout the entire course. Unit 1 was completed on the first two days of class. Unit 3 was completed in one day in the third week of the quarter. Students started their Kits in the sixth week of the quarter, taught them at the end of the eighth and ninth weeks and turned in the final versions during finals week (technically week 11). No topics were introduced before Unit 1, but numerous topics (e.g., basics of lesson planning, such as writing learning objectives) that are not directly addressed in the module need to be covered before students can successfully complete their Kits.
Unit 1
- I introduced science relevance on the first day of class using the first four focus questions in Unit 1.
- We completed the Unit 1 discussion on the second day of the class by discussing locally relevant interdisciplinary societal issues and then applying these to Earth science and soils, mostly following the focus questions outlined in Unit 1. We completed a class societal issues table on the board as described. I also briefly introduced the Kit at this time. I did not hand out the assignment as described, but I talked about the major elements of the Kit and the field practicum so that I could continually relate their classroom experiences to these assignments over the quarter.
- Our team changed the homework and added the systems exercise after the pilot, so I did not include those. I plan to include them the next time I teach the course in the context of integration among subjects and the crosscutting concept, systems.
Unit 2
- I did not have time to include this in my pilot (and it was not in the first draft of the module). I plan to include this the next time I teach the course in the context of the science practice, using data in scientific argument.
Unit 3
- I set up stations 1, 3, 6, and 7, passed out three of the stations to groups of four students, and left station 1 out on an empty lab bench. Each group of students completed its station as a team, and each individual completed the described journal entries in her/his science notebook.
- I rotated the stations among groups, and groups completed station 1 if they were waiting. Each group finished station 1 and two other stations (three total) in one hour.
- During the work time, I walked among the groups facilitating their discussion of the journal entry questions.
- We discussed the described class discussion questions for the last 30 min of class.
- Our team added the systems exercise after the pilot so that was not included.
Unit 4
- I connected daily activities to the Soils, Systems, and Society Kit (Kit) and the teaching practicum throughout the course. For example, on the first day that they looked through the Next Generation Science Standards, they analyzed one of the fifth grade Earth systems performance expectations (5-ESS2-1), because I knew that they would be teaching fifth grade systems science. I also connected this standard to the soils content covered in our module.
- I officially assigned the Kit on the first day of week 6. I had to use my department's own lesson and unit plan format instead of the assignment we provide in our module so I would be consistent with other instructors for this course and our online assessment system (Livetext). Here are my lesson and unit plan assignments: Lesson Plan Template (Acrobat (PDF) 129kB Sep18 15) and Unit Plan Template (Acrobat (PDF) 77kB Sep18 15).
- Each day, for the next four class periods, I introduced a new essential aspect of lesson planning (e.g., writing learning objectives, academic language, etc.). Students would work on that in their groups on their Kits, and then they would have the rest of the time (~ 1 hr) to work on their Kits in general. I continually circulated the class, answering questions, checking common problem spots (known from my previous experience teaching this class) and guiding their work. I would stop the class for a brief discussion if multiple groups were struggling with the same issue.
- Students worked in groups of 4–5 on each Kit (three groups total). This year, my students would have time to teach one 30-min lesson at an outdoor camp and a second 30-min follow-up lesson back in the classroom to the same local fifth grade classrooms. Thus, I required them to plan three lessons as a teacher might around a field trip: pre-camp, camp, and post-camp. The cooperating teachers asked for lessons on stream systems, lake systems (water quality and lake systems), and organisms, so each Kit focused on one of these three big ideas. Students had freedom in designing lessons within each big idea. They had to include everything we discussed in the Kit assignment provided with our module, except the Kit could be broadly relevant to Earth systems and not directly include soil science content that we had covered in class.
- Each group turned in its Kit unit overview and complete camp lesson with all accompanying materials/handouts by the end of week 7.
- I gave them detailed feedback on these and met with each group at the beginning of week 8. Students revised their first lesson based on my feedback and taught it at the local elementary school's outdoor camp at the end of week 8.
- I reviewed their post-camp lesson at the beginning of week 9 and they taught it at the local elementary school at the end of that week.
- Each group turned in its final, revised unit overview and lessons at the beginning of finals week (week 11).
Assessments
I used formative assessment for the Unit 1 discussion. I graded their notes from Unit 3 in the context of their overall science notebooks, which included notes from several activities and weekly reflections.
The Kits were one of the major summative assessments for the course. Combined with the field practicum observation, they were worth 35% of the course. I had to use my department's grading rubrics that are aligned to our lesson and unit plans, instead of the rubric we provide with our module. These are here: Lesson Plan Rubric (Acrobat (PDF) 143kB Sep18 15) and Unit Plan Rubric (Acrobat (PDF) 124kB Sep18 15).
Outcomes
One of the biggest challenges for students in this course is to plan activities around science practices and core concepts instead of first choosing "fun" activities and trying to fit them into standards. When they become elementary teachers they will face the additional huge challenge of teaching engaging and standards-aligned science with very limited time, few resources, and often little training in process or content. Our module is designed to help students address these challenges by asking them to first think about the content (in our case, soils) from different perspectives, using different data, and within various scientific and societal systems. The Kit (Unit 4) then requires students to apply their learning by designing (and in my case teaching) an instructional unit that teaches content within an interdisciplinary, systems thinking and socially relevant context. In the pilot, my students better connected their lessons to locally relevant issues and scientific practices than they had in previous years. Students did not incorporate systems thinking as well as I would have liked, which is why we added the concept mapping throughout our module as described in the current version.
Explore other InTeGrate Instructor Stories