Unit 4: Anatomy of a tragic slide: Oso Landslide case study

Unit 4 Learning Outcomes

×

A view from a Washington Army National Guard helicopter shows trees that were at the very top of the hill when the mudslide occurred now lie across the slide's width like a woven belt.

Provenance: Photo by Sgt. Matthew Sissel Joint Forces Headquarters, Washington National Guard https://www.dvidshub.net/image/1209685/oso-mudslide
Reuse: This item is in the public domain and maybe reused freely without restriction.

• Students will identify several environmental characteristics of a natural landscape that increase an area's mass-wasting susceptibility.
• Students will create a map with appropriate symbology illustrating the morphological characteristics of a mass-wasting event.
• Students will use geodetic data to compare the appearance, existence, and morphology of surface features before and after a mass-wasting event.
• Students will be able to describe the societal toll that landslides can cause and propose mitigation solutions.
  
  Show More info on how learning outcomes connect to science literacy principles and module goals
  Hide
  Supports Module Goals 1 & 2 and Earth Science Big Ideas(links open in new windows)
  ESBI-1: Earth scientists use repeatable observations and testable ideas to understand and explain our planet
  ESBI-3: Earth is a complex system of interacting rock, water, air, and life
  ESBI-4: Earth is continuously changing
  ESBI-8: Natural hazards pose risks to humans
  ESBI-9: Humans significantly alter the Earth

Unit 4 Teaching Objectives

• Cognitive: Provide opportunities for students to use climate and geodetic data to characterize the evolution of landscape features after a mass-wasting event has occurred.
• Behavioral: Facilitate student ability to qualitatively assess and map the changes in geomorphic features before and after a mass-wasting event.
• Affective: Facilitate student ability to analyze the societal impact of mass-wasting events.

The content in Unit 4 is appropriate for introductory geology, hazards, and other geoscience courses; sophomore-level courses in which geodesy and/or geomorphology/surface processes are being introduced; or non-geoscience courses where infrastructure planning, Earth hazards, and/or the nature and methods of science are being investigated. Unit 4 activities can be adapted to serve small or large-enrollment classes and can be executed in lecture and lab settings as an in-class activity in which students work in small groups, a lab exercise, or as part of a ~2 week investigation of the use of geodesy to understand surface-process hazards and decision making using the entire Surface Process Hazards module.

This unit precedes Unit 5: Mitigating future disasters—developing a mass-wasting hazard map in which students create a hazard map and report on an area susceptible to mass wasting. If the entire two-week module will not be used, we recommend pairing Unit 4 with Unit 5 to give students the opportunity to use geodetic data to identify landscape features associated with a slow-slip mass-wasting event and classify low, medium, and high-risk areas based on landscape characteristics. However, Unit 4 does build on skills from Unit 2: Reading the landscape and Unit 3: Understanding landslide factors so you may need to have to give some background practice or information on these topics.

Part 1: Preparatory activity

• In each of the five study sites that students have looked at in Units 2 and 3, there is a significant mass wastage somewhere in the map area. In order to prepare for Unit 4, have students prepare five-minute presentations on one those mass-wastage events (except the Northern Washington one, as the rest of Unit 4 is about the Oso Landslide in that region). If you have a large class, you may want to have the students work in groups or randomly select one person/team from each of the four sites to present. This process helps students understand more about the societal cost of mass wasting and the different types of ones that can occur.
• Unit 4 preparation student exercise (Microsoft Word 2007 (.docx) 304kB Jun20 17)
• Scientific references - this prep exercise calls for students to find scientific articles about the landslide events. If this type of research is not something that works well for your students, here are some links you could give them. It may also help them to refer to the USGS Landslide Fact Sheet.
  • Tully, NY
    • USGS: History of Landslides at the Base of Bare Mountain, Tully Valley, Onondaga County, New York Report
    • USGS: Landslide Susceptibility in the Tully Valley Area, Finger Lakes Region, New York
  • Thistle, UT
    • USGS: Report of the Thistle Slide
    • Utah Geological Survey: Geosights: Thistle Landslide Revisited
  • Kelso, WA
    • USGS: Rockslide-debris Avalanche of May18, 1980, Mt St Helens Volcano
    • USGS: Mt St Helens 1980 Cataclysmic Eruption
  • Prince William Sound, AK
    • AK Dept of Fish & Game: [link https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/70168586 Part 2: Setting the stage 'A submarine landslide source for the devastating 1964 Chenega tsunami, southern Alaska']
    • Earthquake, Landslide and Tsunami Hazards in the Port Valdez area, Alaska

In order to place the Oso Landslide in a larger geologic context, students will review the environmental and built characteristics of the northwest Washington locality using the maps from Units 2 and 3.

A) Plate tectonic setting
Seismic and volcanic hazards exist along all of eastern Washington state related to the subduction of the Juan de Fuca Plate beneath the North American Plate. This is a good opportunity to relate the plate tectonic setting to the landscape features (faults, linear ridges/streams, mountains) and present hazards. Use the same map-set for Northern Washington as you did in Unit 3.
Northern Washington Maps Unit 3-4 (Acrobat (PDF) 41.3MB Oct22 20)

We suggest one of the following already-existing plate tectonics activities:

• GPS Data and Earthquake Hazards in Cascadia - Students learn to read GPS timeseries to calculate velocities and then analyze what the changing velocity across Cascadia means for earthquake hazard.
• Analyzing Plate Motion Using EarthScope GPS Data - Student use a spreadsheet of GPS data from the Plate Boundary Observatory (PBO) to measure the motion of GPS stations in the Pacific Northwest. They generate and map annual velocity vectors of GPS stations.

B) Climatic setting
Washington state has an excellent example of high-precipitation region and a rain shadow. High seasonal precipitation focused on the western slopes of the Cascades and arid conditions prevailing over eastern Washington. In this activity students looks at climate data from near Oso, Washington, as well as a precipitation map of Washington to learn more about the general climate of the area as well as in the time leading up to the slide itself.

• Washington precipitation map (Acrobat (PDF) 1.2MB Feb25 16)
• Unit 4: Oso Washington climate assessment student exercise (Microsoft Word 2007 (.docx) 426kB Jun20 17)
  Unit 4: Oso Washington climate assessment student exercise PDF (Acrobat (PDF) 361kB Aug28 17)
• Unit 4: Oso Washington climate assessment student exercise answer key -- private instructor-only file
  Hide
  Unit 4: Oso Washington climate assessment student exercise answer key

  
  This file is only accessible to verified educators. If you are a teacher or faculty member and would like access to this file please enter your email address to be verified as belonging to an educator.

  Email Adress Submit

  
  
  Unit 4: Oso Washington climate assessment instructor calculations -- private instructor-only file
  Hide
  Unit 4: Oso Washington climate assessment instructor calculations

  
  This file is only accessible to verified educators. If you are a teacher or faculty member and would like access to this file please enter your email address to be verified as belonging to an educator.

  Email Adress Submit

Part 3. Mass-wasting anatomy—Oso, WA, Case Study

Along with the assignment below and the map set they have already used, students should be given a lidar hillshade image onto which they will identify, map, and label morphological features of the mass-wasting event. They will answer qualitative questions and will color code their maps to show regions of high/moderate/low risk for damage due to slip. Students will then be shown spatial data of the region at various timesteps (including SRTM [Shuttle Radar Topography Mission], lidar, and InSAR maps of the locality) and answer questions related to the geology and societal impacts of the event.

• Unit4: Oso Introduction Presentation (PowerPoint 2007 (.pptx) 8.8MB Jun20 17)
  
  
  Click to view
  
  
• Northern Washington Maps Unit 3-4 (Acrobat (PDF) 41.3MB Oct22 20)
• Unit 4 Oso Landslide Exercise (Microsoft Word 2007 (.docx) 34MB Oct21 20)
  Unit 4 Oso landslide exercise PDF (Acrobat (PDF) 16.4MB Oct21 20)
• Unit 4 Oso landslide exercise answer key -- private instructor-only file
  Hide
  Unit 4 Oso landslide exercise answer key

  
  This file is only accessible to verified educators. If you are a teacher or faculty member and would like access to this file please enter your email address to be verified as belonging to an educator.

  Email Adress Submit

• If you have not already and would like to give your students a little more context about geodesy data in general and the lidar and InSAR methods in particular, you could use this short presentation.
  Introduction to Geodesy and Surface Process Hazards Presentation (PowerPoint 2007 (.pptx) 14.7MB Jul11 17)
  
  Click to view
  
  
• This unit seems to go forward in a pretty straightforward way. Although it takes a little extra time, we really do recommend the brief student presentations in Part 1. If students have never done PowerPoint presentations (or other presentation software), you may need to spend a little time explaining what to do or give guidance on what each slide should contain.

Formative Assessment

Most likely, formative assessment will be gathered through discussion with students and observation of students as they work through the exercise. By monitoring classroom activity, the instructor can gauge how students are progressing toward the learning outcomes.

Summative Assessment

The primary summative assessment for the module is the Oso Landslide Exercise. In addition, in order to assess whether students have achieved a sufficient understanding of the societal side of the unit, one of the following questions could be used on a test.

Level 2: Besides the mass of material that buried the town, the Oso mass-wasting event left a mark on the geographic and societal landscape both locally and regionally. Students will be asked to answer the following questions:

1. Name and describe two examples of a local indirect effect of the Oso mass-wasting event—near to the town of Oso.
2. Name and describe two examples of a regional indirect effect of the Oso mass-wasting event—downstream of the event?

Level 3: Students will research what has been done to plan for the future in the aftermath of the Oso event. They will prepare a one-page narrative describing how the community and/or state is working to prevent or preparing for the future in this landslide-prone region.

• Jin-Woo Kim, Zhong Lu, Feifei Qu & Xie Hu (2015) Pre-2014 mudslides at Oso revealed by InSAR and multi-source DEM analysis, Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 6:3, 184-194, DOI: 10.1080/1947705.2015.1016556
• Haugerud, R. A. (2014) Preliminary Interpretation of Pre-2014 Landslide Deposits in the Vicinity of Oso, Washington, USGS Open-File Report 2014–1065
• USGS Follow-up March 2015: One Year Later—The Oso Landslide in Washington.
• Wikipedia Oso Mudslide
• Introduction to Geodesy and Surface Process Hazards Presentation (PowerPoint 2007 (.pptx) 14.7MB Jul11 17)
• https://www.oregongeology.org/Landslide/Landslidehome.htm
• http://www.seattle.gov/dpd/aboutus/whoweare/emergencymanagement/
• http://www.portlandoregon.gov/pbem/53935
• http://landslides.usgs.gov/
• http://landslides.usgs.gov/learn/prepare.php
• http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/1325/