Physical Properties of Minerals and Determinative Techniques
Summary
This activity uses cooperative learning to identify minerals in hand sample based on physical properties. The "Jigsaw" pedagogy upon which this lab is based provides the environment for four succeeding labs in which the students learn the megascopic characteristic properties, chemical composition, and a geologic significance for each of approximately 100 minerals.
Context
Audience
This activity is designed for an undergraduate required course in mineralogy and is generally for sophomore or junior level students.
Skills and concepts that students must have mastered
Physical geology
How the activity is situated in the course
This activity is a stand-alone exercise, but is part of a larger volume of classroom and laboratory activities from "Teaching Mineralogy," a workbook published by the Mineralogical Society of America, Brady, J., Mogk, D. W., and Perkins, D., (editors), 1997,406 pp.
Goals
Content/concepts goals for this activity
This activity allows students to:
- Identify minerals based on streak, luster, cleavage/fracture, hardness, density, and other characteristics
- Accurately describe and teach classmates about physical properties of minerals
Higher order thinking skills goals for this activity
This activity strengthens student skills in:
- using multiple lines of observational data to identify minerals
Other skills goals for this activity
This activity uses aa Jigsaw pedagogy to strengthen students' abitlity to:
- Work cooperatively in groups
- Improve student writing skills by writing a laboratory report
- Strengthen students' skills in oral presentations of their data and data analysis
Description of the activity/assignment
This activity uses cooperative learning to identify minerals in hand sample based on physical properties. The "Jigsaw" pedagogy upon which this lab is based provides the environment for four succeeding labs in which the students learn the megascopic characteristic properties, chemical composition, and a geologic significance for each of approximately 100 minerals.
Determining whether students have met the goals
Each student is graded on the total lab report, his or her original work and that of classmates. If experts present wrong information, all who accept that data are penalized. This strategy reinforces the learner's responsibility to ask constructive questions of experts when the information doesn't make sense. Each student can also be graded individually on the portion of the exercise for which he was responsible. Once students accept their mutual dependence and stop competing with one another, the class room atmosphere becomes very supportive.
More information about assessment tools and techniques.Teaching materials and tips
- Activity Description/Assignment (Microsoft Word 40kB Apr27 08)
- Activity Description/Assignment (Acrobat (PDF) 55kB May3 08)
Share your modifications and improvements to this activity through the Community Contribution Tool »
Other Materials
Supporting references/URLs
Brady, J., Mogk, D. W., and Perkins, D., (editors), 1997, Teaching Mineralogy, a workbook published by the Mineralogical Society of America, 406 pp.
Mineralogical Society of America - become a member today!
Mineralogical Society of America - become a member today!