This activity was selected for the On the Cutting Edge Reviewed Teaching Collection
This activity has received positive reviews in a peer review process involving five review categories. The five categories included in the process are
- Scientific Accuracy
- Alignment of Learning Goals, Activities, and Assessments
- Pedagogic Effectiveness
- Robustness (usability and dependability of all components)
- Completeness of the ActivitySheet web page
For more information about the peer review process itself, please see http://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/review.html.
This page first made public: Feb 25, 2009
Peer instruction may offer some of the richest opportunities for metacognitive teaching. Reciprocal (peer) teaching forces the instructor to use a whole series of metacognitive processes such as determining what the learner already knows, deciding what is to be taught/learned and how; monitoring comprehension and evaluating the outcome in terms of increased comprehension, which in turn encourages the instructor to reflect upon his or her own thinking processes. By asking the students to defend their answer to a question to another student you are, in effect, moving the role of "teacher" to the students.
Context for Use
While peer instruction is a model used for improving cognition it can also be employed to improve metacognition. Just as we might use peer instruction for students to compare their content understanding with peers in class we can also use it to compare learning strategies.
Description and Teaching Materials
- Individually explain why there are annual variations in CO2 and in what season is it highest.
- In teams of two or more share their answers.
- After sharing their answers ask them to edit their previous response, underline what they changed, and articulate what makes them think their revised answer is stronger.
- Select teams randomly and have them discuss their answers, how the discussion led them to change their initial answer and what lingering doubts remain.
- After selecting some number of teams try to point out examples of how the peer discussion changed conceptual understanding, problem-solving skills, and critical thinking.
Teaching Notes and Tips
Metacognitive teaching can be facilitated through "peer instruction" in methods similar to those presented in the analogy activity. This approach, which is employed early in a course, asks the instructor to directly discuss the metacognitive process in class in lieu of discipline content. Describe the value of metacognitive reflection on learning (see, for example, Teaching Metacognition). For example, if you use student response systems (i.e. 'clickers' or web-based tools like LectureTools) tell students why you have them engage in student response with peer instruction. It's not always obvious to students what they should be getting out of these kinds of learning experiences. Some students think the point of these activities is to simply get the 'right' (or at least most popular) answer. Explicitly explain that these activities are usually intended to develop students' conceptual understanding,problem-solving skills, and critical thinking skills, but this only happens if students engage in meaningful discussions with their peers.
At some point later in the course ask students to reflect on if and how the sharing of study strategies affected their own study strategy. Did the process help them reflect on their own methods? Did they learn some additional strategies that they adopted for themselves?