Cutting Edge > GIS and Remote Sensing > Activities > Exercise 6: Nevada Mines analysis – choosing water sampling sites to test for possible water contamination
Author Profile

This activity has benefited from input from faculty educators beyond the author through a review and suggestion process.

This review took place as a part of a faculty professional development workshop where groups of faculty reviewed each others' activities and offered feedback and ideas for improvements. To learn more about the process On the Cutting Edge uses for activity review, see http://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/review.html.

This activity was selected for the On the Cutting Edge Exemplary Teaching Collection

Resources in this top level collection a) must have scored Exemplary or Very Good in all five review categories, and must also rate as “Exemplary” in at least three of the five categories. The five categories included in the peer review process are

  • Scientific Accuracy
  • Alignment of Learning Goals, Activities, and Assessments
  • Pedagogic Effectiveness
  • Robustness (usability and dependability of all components)
  • Completeness of the ActivitySheet web page

For more information about the peer review process itself, please see http://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/review.html.



This page first made public: Aug 2, 2010

Exercise 6: Nevada Mines analysis – choosing water sampling sites to test for possible water contamination

Barbara and David Tewksbury, Hamilton College

Summary

Students use an EPA data set of Nevada mines to evaluate proximity of mine sites to streams to choose priority water sampling sites to evaluate for possible contamination. Students export data to Google Earth to use satellite imagery to narrow the priority sites further. You might also be interested in our Full GIS course with links to all assignments.

Context

Type and level of course
Entry level GIS course for geoscience students.

Geoscience background assumed in this assignment
Limited knowledge of water pollution from mine sites.

GIS/remote sensing skills/background assumed in this assignment
Dealing with projections and coordinate systems, hillshading and colorizing a DEM, cropping a DEM to an outline, working with attribute tables and selecting by atttibute, symbolizing, buffering, creating work flow charts, using data frames, creating map layouts.

Software required for this assignment/activity:
ArcGIS 9.3 (ArcInfo license level) with Spatial Analyst extension; Google Earth.

Time required for students to complete the assignment:
One week of class time plus homework.

Goals

GIS/remote sensing techniques students learn in this assignment
Creating Euclidean distance rasters, making shapefiles from buffers, making multiple ring buffers, exporting data to .kml/.kmz format, adding placemarks and doing screen captures in Google Earth.

Other content/concepts goals for this activity
Practice using ArcMap Help and Search functions.

Higher order thinking skills goals for this activity
Analysis of multiple data sets to prioritize sampling targets.

Description of the activity/assignment

This is Exercise 6 in a semester-long GIS for Geoscientists course. You can find the other exercises in this series on the course summary page or by typing Tewksbury GIS Exercise into the Cutting Edge search engine.

The EPA has a great georeferenced data set of over 8000 mine shafts in Nevada, and this exercise tasks students with using distance rasters and buffering to determine which mine shafts in Nevada are closest to streams and rivers and to make a priority list of locations to target for water sampling to test for mine-related water contamination.

Once students have made an initial priority list of targets based on proximity to streams, they use the Layer to KML tool in ArcMap to export their data to Google Earth so that they can use readily available high resolution satellite imagery to further narrow their priority list of targets based on what they can see in the satellite imagery (e.g., adjacent or downstream towns and cities, major mining districts, etc.). They turn in a final recommendation supported by a rationale, ArcMap, and Google Eath screen captures.

Exercise 6a: Homework assignment for downloading data sets for the exercise from the National Atlas and the EPA site (with exception of Devada DEM – see supporting URL below) and prepping the data.

Exercise 6b: In-class work creating a base map and exploring a variety of ways of selecting targets for water sampling (buffering, Euclidean distance rasters).

Exercise 6c: Homework assignment exporting to Google Earth, revising the priority list of targets, and writing a short recommendation, with rationale and illustrated by and ArcMap and several Google Earth screen captures. Bringing kmz files into ArcMap, and creating Google Earth tours.

Determining whether students have met the goals

More information about assessment tools and techniques.

URLs and References

Student work is assessed on the basis of the quality and completeness of their ArcMaps, the rationale for the priority list, and the presentation of the recommendation.

The Nevada DEM on the EPA web site is huge – it took three hours to download, which is a problem for students. I downloaded the DEM and put it onto our server for students to download from there. You can download the DEM at Nevada DEM.

Download teaching materials and tips

Other Materials





Exercise 6: Nevada Mines analysis – choosing water sampling sites to test for possible water contamination -- Discussion  

Join the Discussion


Log in to reply


« Exercise 6: Cartography       Exercise 4: Choropleth Map of the Happiest States, plus Effective Map Design »