Project X
Summary
Context
Audience
Skills and concepts that students must have mastered
How the activity is situated in the course
Goals
Content/concepts goals for this activity
Higher order thinking skills goals for this activity
Other skills goals for this activity
Description and Teaching Materials
Step 1 is to provide to student an overview of Project X (Microsoft Word 2007 (.docx) 25kB May25 20) in terms of step-by-step requirements followed by examples of completed posters (see below). These products are made available digitally to the students for reference.
Step 2 is to review a list of choices of the locations/settings (Microsoft Word 2007 (.docx) 5MB May25 20) for which a source-information journal article (pdf) will be provided. The instructor should identify (by figure number) the pertinent published geologic cross-section, which is especially important if there are multiple geologic-cross sections in the article. It is important to go over the list of choices prior to students making their selections so that students have a basis to make more informed decisions. Students learn that some of the geologic cross-sections express shortening, whereas others express stretching; some are dominated by folding, others by faulting; some are full of low-angle normal faults, others by high-angle normal faults; some record superposed deformation involving both shortening and stretching. A natural biproduct of this review is introducing some broad-based regional geology.
Step 3 is to have students choose their system and to provide each student with a pdf of the source article. Breadth of choice is reasonably assured by having a list of choices that well exceeds the number of students enrolled in the class. Some students may wish to choose an area this is not on the list provided. This is an option, but requires the instructor to assure herself/himself that an acceptable geological cross-section is available, and that the journal article within which the cross-section is contained is one that lends itself to the objectives of Project X.
Step 4 is to host the poster session, making clear in advance the basis on which grading/evaluation (Microsoft Word 2007 (.docx) 14kB May25 20) is carried out. Each student presentation is typically rather brief, less than 10 minutes including Q and A.
Files:
- Project X instructions (Microsoft Word 2007 (.docx) 25kB May25 20)
- Project X choices (Microsoft Word 2007 (.docx) 5MB May25 20)
- Project X grading rubric (Microsoft Word 2007 (.docx) 14kB May25 20)
Examples of Project X posters
It is useful from a workload and learning standpoint to subdivide Project X into two parts (A and B) for two separate presentations. The first part lays the groundwork, focusing on the location; a written description of the 'system of structures'; geological column; geologic map; geologic cross-section; spread-sheet measurements of fault and fold data; and plate-tectonic setting. The second part addresses geometric, kinematic, and mechanical analysis, perhaps with some additional expansion on plate-tectonic origin. Part A is presented as a poster. Part B is presented as a poster. Two examples are attached here, with the student authors' permission:
- Anya Kadlubowski's analysis of a complex structure-tectonic system in Tibet:
- Kadlubowski, Part A, Tibet (Acrobat (PDF) 1.1MB May25 20)
- Kadlubowski, Part B, Tibet (Acrobat (PDF) 369kB May25 20)
- David Cantillo's analysis of a fold/thrust system in Central Peru:
- Cantillo, Part A, Peru (Acrobat (PDF) 11MB May25 20)
- Cantillo, Part B, Peru (Acrobat (PDF) 4.4MB May25 20)
Teaching Notes and Tips
Project X requires that the geologic cross-section, maps, and geologic column to be featured on the poster are not just cut-and-paste products, but rather are figures that the student has adapted and transformed in ways that are in keeping with the goals of the project. This typically requires reducing the number of geological formations to just several 'groupings' of formations that are represented in the geologic column, geologic cross-section, and geologic map. There needs to be a common color-coding for these rock-unit groupings in the geological column, cross-section, and geologic map. The geologic cross-section should be the centerpiece of the poster, rendered in a manner that clearly emphasizes key structures, e.g., emboldening traces of major faults and clearly representing apparent relative displacement using arrows.
The adaptation of original figures can be achieved through smart retracing of originals, but better yet through the use of Illustrator or some other drawing technology tool. Similarly, interpretive figures and drawings, including plate-tectonic maps, are to be adapted and not just cut- and pasted. It is the act of adapting and transforming that stimulates deeper learning and understanding. Students can arrange the components in poster form through use of PowerPoint. Ideally this is preceded by the instructor focusing some attention on what constitutes a 'good' vs 'bad' poster.
It is crucial that instructors make students aware of the academic-integrity line separating appropriate distillation of journal text versus plagiarism. The specialized language of journals is challenging and will be a temptation for some students to paraphrase journal-article language too closely. Instructors can remove students from harm's way by insisting that their posters NOT contain paragraphs and sentences of responses, but rather bullet points expressing the critical information and observations. Emphasize to students the importance of 'putting things in your own words' and drawing upon points of emphasis highlighted in lab and in the classroom.
Related activity: Crust-Busting Fault Project
Project X and the Crust-Busting Fault Project activities are complementary. The former provides a level of experience and confidence that results in higher potential for performance in the latter. Project X is more prescribed, for when a student selects a given fault/fold system from a list of choices, she/he automatically receives from the instructor the source journal article and geologic cross-section. However, when students select their 'crust-busting fault' from a list (see Crust-Busting Fault Project), they have the responsibility to track down references and thus gain valuable experience in learning how to access literature.
There is a pedagogical distinction between Project X and the Crust-Busting Fault Project. Project-X is fundamentally an analysis of a geologic cross-section, which represents a 2D data set. Interpretations are 2D in nature in the plane of the cross-section, e.g., direction of shortening, direction of stretching, transfer of fault slip upward into a fold. The Crust-Busting Fault Project is explicitly 3D, where (for a given system) geologic map and cross-sectional relationships together are necessary to tell the fuller story. Moreover, for active crust-busting faults, the Crust-Busting Fault Project creates a transition from structural geology into active tectonics, and optimum data sets can expand to include maps displaying GPS velocity vectors, earthquake focal mechanisms, and earthquake distributions/magnitudes. Indeed, for the Crust-Busting Fault Project there tends to be a notable tectonics emphasis, especially for active crust-busters.