Initial Publication Date: July 26, 2017
Lorraine Motola: Using Major Storms and Community Resilience in Disaster Response and Recovery at Metropolitan College of New York
About this Course
Upper division, major course.
2
students
One 1 hour and 50 minute lecture
per week
Disaster Response and Recovery Syllabus (Acrobat (PDF) 294kB Oct23 16)
This course provides students with a basic overview of disaster response and recovery, which focuses on strategies to minimize the consequences of disasters such as earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, power outages, and/or terrorist attacks. The components of response and recovery are reviewed in the context of the other phases of emergency management. Emphasis will be placed on the three C's: coordination, cooperation, and communication in addition to short-term recovery planning vs. long-term recovery planning. Social and psychological recovery will also be discussed.
- Define the various key concepts of disaster response and recovery.
- Explain the risks to an organization and possible obstacles to its response and recovery.
- Create and document new strategies to improve the organization's response and recovery.
- Analyze potential risks and prepare plans to mitigate the risks.
- Four Phases of Comprehensive Emergency Management/Difference between Mitigation & Preparedness
- Hospital Incident Command System (HICS)
- HICS/Group Project
- Concept Mapping, Probabilities of Risk
- Vulnerability, Emergency Management, & Mitigation
- Application of Concepts to Case Studies/Geoscience Perspectives on Winter Storms & Hurricanes
- Storm Impacts & Risk Communication
- Town Hall meeting
- Stakeholder, Risk Assessment & Risk Management
A Success Story in Building Student Engagement
My course is designed for upper level Disaster Management students currently in the field, or seeking to enter the field. That said I think it is advantageous to seek out real world materials that support the academic goals of the program with career preparation in mind. Therefore the module satisfies those desires while offering systems thinking, building interdisciplinary connections, using real world examples and local data. This methodology is an extremely beneficial framework.
This module showed the students how to get to know their local hazards and how to mitigate them. It also stressed the importance of learning what the geoscientist community knows and how to embrace that information to convey it during a Town Hall meeting.
My Experience Teaching with InTeGrateMaterials
Because class enrollment was extremely low, group projects had to be adapted for individuals. For example, the town hall meeting took on the presidential town hall formats. The student presented their policy paper, instructor served as the event moderator and asked a series of questions. Then the other student was given an opportunity to ask questions.
Relationship of InTeGrate Materials to my Course
The course is fourteen weeks long and the module was introduced during the second half of the semester. Topics introduced before the module included the Four Phases of Comprehensive Emergency Management/What is the Difference between Mitigation & Preparedness. ISDR The Four Elements of Effective Warning Systems — "Failure in any one part can mean failure of the whole system" and the Tilly Smith tsunami warning video. DHS 16 Critical Infrastructures and the American Society of Civil Engineers/ Infrastructure Report card. That said the module course materials blended with and reinforced earlier systems thinking lectures.
The course syllabus distributed at the onset of the semester was overly ambitious. In an essence I should have used the material throughout the entire semester and will do so going forward. This program is geared to working adults, active military, law enforcement students as well as those seeking to enter the field of Disaster Management.
Topics not covered included Sea-Level Rise and Coastal Erosion. It was my intention, if course enrollment was up, to have brought in one or two guest speakers with geoscience expertise to conduct these sessions.
Course highlights and an outline follow:
The students were very involved in the concept map activities and ordering. We developed two concept maps, the practice version focused on the US Dept of Homeland Security's Critical Infrastructures. Prior to this class the students were given a related FEMA independent Study certificate course, as a homework assignment, listed in the module. I then handed out the Homeland Security Sector Risk Snapshots, May 2014 document, listed as a Unit 1 Resource, we reviewed the document including sector dependencies and inter-dependencies. Next each student ordered the 16 Critical Infrastructure, a discussion followed whereby each student defended their rating. For the second concept map, the students developed a list of hazards on the classroom's whiteboard, after completing their individual concept map, a discussion followed. I think the students were very engaged because they were able to study the complex, relationships and interactions while approaching the assignment in a comfortable atmosphere. The concept map provided them with an excellent visual and as a backgrounder to the overall module.
The Probability and Comparative Probabilities of Risk Activity was a real eye-opener for the students. It gave them a chance to analyze Real World data published in a Hazard Mitigation Plan, including the number of instances when a state required federal assistance, frequency, average costs etc. The students found the total and average costs of federal assistance shocking, a lively Disaster Economics discussion --- Are Disasters Good or Bad for the Economy? --- ensued. I then projected the US National Debt Clock Real Time and the Debt Clock Time Machine on the whiteboard to support the discussion.
In summary the students were very overwhelmed with the amount of material compressed into a short time-frame and I believe they would have benefited if I drilled down on fewer topics, or spread out the material throughout the semester. That said going forward I am leaning toward the latter. In doing so, I will also invite a geoscience guest speakers to conduct the Sea Level Rise and Coastal Erosion lesson and activities.
Additional highlights are mentioned in "My Experience Teaching with InTeGrate Materials" section.
UNIT 1
Class 1
- Concept Map;
- Reading Chapters 5, 6 and 7 Fundamentals of Emergency Management
Class 2
- Probability & Comparative Probabilities of Risk;
- Review Hazard Mitigation Plan
UNIT 2
Class 3
- Hazard Vulnerability Analysis using Kaiser Permanent Tool, write a summary;
Class 4
- Hazard Mitigation Plan Analysis memorandum;
- FEMA IS 328 Local Plan Review
- Read pages 21-26 in Chapter II State of New Hampshire Mitigation Plan 2013
UNIT 4
Class 5
- Press Release
- FEMA IS 29 Public Information Awareness
Class 6
Class 7
Assessments
I found that the students were most engaged during the Concept Map Activity and the Probability and Comparative Probabilities of Risk Activity. These activities served as an excellent foundation in preparing for the other module assessments I used; Hazard Vulnerability Analysis, Hazard Mitigation Plan memo, press release, Town Hall Debate and in developing their policy papers.
The information armed the students with confidence and expertise displayed not only when completing the Hazard Vulnerability Analysis matrix but in defending their positions in class. Additionally the activities were extremely helpful in order to develop and/or deliver their press releases, town hall debate and policy paper.
Outcomes
The things that I had hoped students would take-away from the module were:
-
conduct independent research on hazards, storm events and policies by embracing the contents of a Hazard Mitigation Plan;
-
analyze Hazard Mitigation Plans ... what worked, observations/recommendations ... what did not work, observations/recommendations;
-
compile and deliver Lessons Learned information for leadership and stakeholders as a way to improve emergency preparedness and community resilience in a variety of venues including a Town Hall style meeting.
I observed that the students were able to Incorporate the above goals in the module activities and assignments.
Explore other InTeGrate Instructor Stories