InTeGrate Modules and Courses >Coastal Processes, Hazards and Society > Student Materials > Module 9: Smart Building > The Need for Growth > The Greater New Orleans
InTeGrate's Earth-focused Modules and Courses for the Undergraduate Classroom
showLearn More
These materials are part of a collection of classroom-tested modules and courses developed by InTeGrate. The materials engage students in understanding the earth system as it intertwines with key societal issues. The collection is freely available and ready to be adapted by undergraduate educators across a range of courses including: general education or majors courses in Earth-focused disciplines such as geoscience or environmental science, social science, engineering, and other sciences, as well as courses for interdisciplinary programs.
Explore the Collection »
show Download
The student materials are available for offline viewing below. Downloadable versions of the instructor materials are available from this location on the instructor materials pages. Learn more about using the different versions of InTeGrate materials »

Download a PDF of all web pages for the student materials

Download a zip file that includes all the web pages and downloadable files from the student materials

For the Instructor

These student materials complement the Coastal Processes, Hazards and Society Instructor Materials. If you would like your students to have access to the student materials, we suggest you either point them at the Student Version which omits the framing pages with information designed for faculty (and this box). Or you can download these pages in several formats that you can include in your course website or local Learning Managment System. Learn more about using, modifying, and sharing InTeGrate teaching materials.

The Greater New Orleans

The city of New Orleans expansion was partially driven by the need for space (to expand) and the unavailability of sufficient space above sea level. Driven partially by flood protection measures due to the Mississippi River and Tributaries project, the city expanded into the former back-swamp north of its original footprint. Small scale levees, termed drainage levees, were constructed on the South shore of Lake Pontchartrain and drainage canals were dredged so that floodwaters could be conveyed out to the lake. To facilitate drainage from an area that is shaped like a bowl (recall Digital Elevation map earlier) an elaborate system of pumping stations, in conjunction with the levees had to be built. Despite these improvements, the city was still frequently flooded by hurricane induced storm surge, including major floods in 1947 and 1965. These events and particularly hurricane Betsy in 1965 resulted in the inception of another federal project, where the Lake Pontchartrain levees were raised to the current elevation. But, the lack of space to construct strong earthen levees such as those that line up the Mississippi River banks called for a hybrid construction method. This included the addition of sheet pile walls added atop the existing drainage canal levees, forming the foundation for the concrete flood walls. These structures failed catastrophically during Hurricane Katrina. Figure 9.10 below gives a typical cross-section of the city stretching from the river on the left to the lake on the right.

Was the catastrophic flooding from hurricane Katrina due to false protection and unknown risk? To partially answer the above question, we examine city urbanization patterns with the city topography and flood depths from the widespread event that provided the only data point for flooding post 1965. Historically, and to accommodate the growing population of the city, settlement expanded from the crescent-shaped high ground that was organized along the natural levees of the Mississippi river into the former backswamp areas. This expansion would not have been possible without the development of cutting edge pumping technologies coupled with an elaborate and challenging levee building construction. These technologies first enabled the swamps to be drained, promoted development to extend into these low areas, and helped continue to keep the city drained during heavy rainfall. But, the modifications that took place post 1965 were proven to be the most vulnerable, and were not really tested until decades later. While still not immune to flooding risks, areas above sea level in the original city plan were significantly less vulnerable and faired relatively well during Katrina. Recall the DEM at the beginning of the module, and now examine the figure below. From the figure to the left, it can be seen that New Orleans did not expand significantly into low elevation areas until the late 19th century, exposing the population in the newly-settled areas to elevated flood risks. Up until this point, the settlement patterns of the city clearly followed smart building principles, where development was generally limited to the higher elevations of the natural levees and relic distributary ridges. False protection afforded by the levees and an elaborate pumping system, produced piece of mind but without contingency or layered defense concept/approach, produced catastrophic flooding when failed.

Recommended Additional Reading

New Orleans: the future of rebuilding

Read Sustaining coastal urban ecosystemsfrom Nature Geoscience (most colleges have a paid subscription to this journal which is required for access).


These materials are part of a collection of classroom-tested modules and courses developed by InTeGrate. The materials engage students in understanding the earth system as it intertwines with key societal issues. The collection is freely available and ready to be adapted by undergraduate educators across a range of courses including: general education or majors courses in Earth-focused disciplines such as geoscience or environmental science, social science, engineering, and other sciences, as well as courses for interdisciplinary programs.
Explore the Collection »