How Clean is Nuclear Energy? An Evaluation of the Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Power as an Alternative Energy Source
This activity was selected for the On the Cutting Edge Reviewed Teaching Collection
This activity has received positive reviews in a peer review process involving five review categories. The five categories included in the process are
- Scientific Accuracy
- Alignment of Learning Goals, Activities, and Assessments
- Pedagogic Effectiveness
- Robustness (usability and dependability of all components)
- Completeness of the ActivitySheet web page
For more information about the peer review process itself, please see http://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/review.html.
This page first made public: Oct 9, 2012
The search for alternative sources of energy is a primary environmental issue worldwide. This activity describes a writing assignment that incorporates critical ideas such as the need for alternative energy sources, fundamental principles of nuclear energy as well as the advantages and disadvantages of this energy source when compared to fossil fuels. This assignment is in lieu of a laboratory activity during the discussion of nuclear chemistry within the general chemistry curriculum.
Learning Outcomes for the Assignment
- Students will be exposed to an important and controversial environmental issue
- Students will learn to apply fundamental principles of nuclear chemistry to real life topics such as nuclear energy and how nuclear power plants work.
- Students will learn to find information relating to nuclear energy from various sources
- Students will identify advantages and disadvantages of nuclear energy as an alternate energy source (keeping the scope to within the discussion of environmental impacts and not cost)
- Students will gain experience writing an argumentative paper
- Students will gain practice in synthesizing information and concepts gained from other aspects of the general chemistry curriculum to support their arguments.
Context for Use
TimeframeThis activity should be introduced after the main principles of nuclear energy have been covered in class to give students ample background on the topic. Ideally, students should be given at least one week to complete the assignment. If it is to be used in lieu of a laboratory activity, students may be given time during the usual laboratory schedule to do their research. If this assignment is incorporated in a first year class, it is an ideal activity for students to be introduced to the library staff in your institution. Instructors can get the library staff involved and have a representative come to your class to assist students in researching various sources for the assignment.
Possible Use in Other CoursesThis activity is transferable to non-chemistry based courses. It is an ideal activity for any environmental issues class or any course with a focus on energy. The concept of allowing students to compare the advantages and disadvantages of nuclear power to fossil fuels or other alternative energy sources can be made without the direct application of the fundamental chemistry principles that this activity recommends if used in the context of a general chemistry course.
Description and Teaching Materials
Recommended Lead In Activities to the Assignment
- Lecture(s), class discussion(s) and problem set on the topic of reaction kinetics and radioactive decay.
- Lecture(s) and class discussion on nuclear chemistry and how nuclear power plant works
Description of Writing AssignmentThis can be given in lieu of a laboratory activity as the class covers the topic of nuclear chemistry. Students are asked to compare the environmental impacts associated with fossil fuels and nuclear power plants. The assignment is designed to be an argumentative piece where students need to provide evidence to support the arguments that they will make. Some guided questions and hints are included in the assignment to help students complete a comprehensive analysis of the issue. In the assignment, students are guided for a thorough examination of the issue of waste. A theoretical/hypothetical calculation of "amount" of waste produced for both energy sources is required from the students. This allows students to apply their knowledge of "nuclear decay" and carbon dioxide emissions in making their arguments.
Teaching Notes and Tips
Possible variations or extensions to the activity:This argumentative writing assignment can be extended into a debate format where students are divided into two groups one supporting and the other against nuclear power. Students should be given ample time to research their side of the argument in preparation for the debate. The debate should be moderated by the course instructor or alternatively by another faculty member. Students should be given rules of the debate such as who will speak first, how long each response should be and how long the debate as a whole should take.
Alternatively, the concept of this assignment can be altered to be a group work where the students are divided into different groups and assigned to be certain stakeholders relating to the issue of alternative energy source. Examples of potential stakeholders are: Government Agency (Environmental Protection Act), nuclear power company, electric company that relies heavily on fossil fuels, consumer groups and environmental activist group. The culmination of the activity could be a town hall meeting where stakeholders will present their sides of the issue. This version of the activity will require preparation time similar to that of the debate format suggested above.
A sample rubric is included in the supporting documents to this teaching and learning activity.
References and Resources