The QuIRK project website hasn't been significantly updated since 2010. We are preserving the web pages here because they still contain useful ideas and content. But be aware that the site may have out of date information.
You may be interested in checking out the Developing Quantitative Reasoning module of Pedagogy in Action.
Initial Publication Date: August 21, 2008

Assigning Writing: Give your students a "RAFT" and a "TIP"

Quirk Workshop Graphic

In an assignment handout, explain:

Role (or Purpose):
  • Helps student understand the purpose for writing (inform? analyze? persuade?)
  • Helps student understand the impact the piece of writing is supposed to have on the audience (change the audience's view of something? teach the audience something?)
Audience:
  • Helps student ask rhetorical questions about intended readers
    • How much does my audience already know or care about my subject?
    • What constitutes old information and new information for this audience?
    • What is my audience's starting view of my subject? What alternative views must I address?
    • Am I addressing an insider or outsider audience? Are my readers more or less expert than me?
  • Helps students learn to write effective titles and introductions
Format (or Genre):
  • Helps students know what the document is supposed to look like (length, font, margins, spacing, documentation style)
  • Helps students learn concept of genre (scholarly article, experimental report, op-ed piece, proposal)
  • Helps students see format and style as features of genres rather than quirks of individual teachers.
Task as an Ill-Stuctured Problem:
  • Models the thinking processes of experienced academic writers
  • Leads to greater transference of writing skills from discipline to discipline
  • Teaches disciplinary thinking—requires high level of critical thought
  • Helps students understand the problem-thesis structure of academic introductions


Questions for Peer-Reviewing an Assignment Handout

  • Is the assignment clear? How might a student misread the assignment and do something not anticipated?
  • Does the assignment specify an audience and a role or purpose for the writer?
  • Are my grading criteria clear? Have I adequately explained them to students?
  • If you were a student, would you find the assignment interesting and challenging?
  • If you were a student, how difficult would this assignment be? How long do you think it would take?
  • If the assignment is quite difficult, could it be preceded by a simpler "skill-building assignment" that would serve as scaffolding?
  • To what extent does this assignment stimulate critical thinking? Does it cause students to wrestle with key concepts or key thinking skills in the course?
  • Is the purpose of the assignment clear? Does it seem to tie into my course goals? Would it seem like busy work to some students?
  • Are the mechanics of the assignment clear (due dates, expected length, single versus double spacing, typed versus handwritten, manuscript form, etc.?)
  • Is the process students should go through as explicit as possible?
  • Should I build any checkpoints built into the assignment to verify that students are on track? (e.g., submission of a thesis, title, and introduction? Mandatory conference? Annotated bibliography?)