Laboratory Activity: The Sun and Climate
This activity was selected for the On the Cutting Edge Reviewed Teaching Collection
This activity has received positive reviews in a peer review process involving five review categories. The five categories included in the process are
- Scientific Accuracy
- Alignment of Learning Goals, Activities, and Assessments
- Pedagogic Effectiveness
- Robustness (usability and dependability of all components)
- Completeness of the ActivitySheet web page
For more information about the peer review process itself, please see http://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/review.html.
This activity has benefited from a review and suggestion process as a part of an activity development workshop.
This activity has benefited from input from faculty educators beyond the author through a review and suggestion process as a part of an activity development workshop. Workshop participants were provided with a set of criteria against which they evaluated each others' activities. After the review, the authors developed a plan for revising their activities based on the feedback they received from their peers. To learn more about this review process, see http://serc.carleton.edu/quantskills/review_processes.html#2006.
This page first made public: Jul 20, 2006
In this physical geography lab, students examine the relationship between solar altitude, solar declination, and temperature regimes. The students begin by relating solar altitude to something that they have had practice observing (shadows). They then use a sextant to measure the sun's altitude more precisely. Students also make decisions about what other data and metadata to record in their field notes in order to determine how solar altitude is related to temperature. After comparing their measurements to the predicted solar altitude for San Diego, the students calculate solar altitudes for other locations on the globe. As a follow-up exercise, students compare their solar altitude graphs with temperature data, and qualitatively predict the temperature regime in the arctic based on solar altitude.
The main skills that students learn are:
- the ability to visualize the relationship between the subsolar point (solar declination) and the sun's altitude above the horizon at a given location (solar altitude);
- the ability to present, analyze and interpret data in graphical form;
- the ability to decide what data should be recorded to answer a given question; and
- the ability to use a sextant. Students also practice unit conversion, making drawings to scale, taking clear and complete field notes, and using a protractor to measure angle.
Context for Use
Equipment required for the lab includes a sextant, a tape measure, a clock or watch, a thermometer, an atlas, graph paper, and a flagpole (somewhere on campus). In addition, students in the lab are required to have a physical geography textbook, a protractor, a calculator, a ruler, writing utensils, and a field notebook.
This activity should be done near the beginning of a physical geography course. I have presented it as the third lab exercise out of 12. Pedagogically, the reason for this is that students learn about climate early in the course, and can then make connections between climate and other geographic patterns. Logistically, I like to schedule this exercise at a time of year when the weather is unlikely to be cloudy (during the months of August-September in San Diego). Measurements of solar altitude should be taken as close to local solar noon as possible (at SDCC, the geography lab is scheduled so that it begins close to noon). At SDCC, most courses are semester-long, allowing students to take solar angle/temperature measurements over the course of a few months.
Before attempting this lab, students should know how to read and construct a graph, the meaning of "scale," how to use a simple algebraic formula, and the meaning of latitude and longitude. With the exception of algebra, all of these would have been covered in previous labs and lectures.
Some parts of this lab activity are specifically geared toward San Diego City College (e.g. the location of the flagpole, and the solar altitude curve for San Diego), but it is fairly straightforward to adopt these to other locations.
Description and Teaching Materials
- measuring and analyzing the shadow of a flagpole to determine the sun's angle above the horizon;
- using a sextant to measure the solar altitude at the students' location, and deciding on other data to collect for a semester-long experiment relating solar altitude to temperature;
- using solar declination to calculate solar altitude for other locations; and
- comparing solar altitude graphs to temperature data obtained from the Web.
Students begin part 1 by finding the flagpole and measuring its shadow. Students should bring all of their writing and drawing materials, including field notebooks, pencils, protractors, rulers, and calculators. Scale drawings of the flagpole can be done "in the field" and corrected if the students do not have the necessary information. They may work in groups -- typically, groups of no more than 3 are allowed.
When the students are finished with the questions about the flagpole, students begin considering the sun's altitude. It is important to force students to think about what data they are going to collect before allowing them to use the sextant. It is useful to have more than one sextant for this exercise. Again, students may work in groups of no more than three.
After the students use the sextant to determine the sun's angle, they should complete questions 9 and 10 (graphing their solar altitude measurement, error analysis, and evaluating the connection between solar altitude and the flagpole's shadow) before leaving.
If time remains, students can use the rest of the lab period to make the necessary graphs. Lab Handout (PDF) (Acrobat (PDF) 668kB Jun25 06) Lab Handout (Word) (Microsoft Word 1.3MB Jun25 06) Lab Answers and Notes (Microsoft Word 1.7MB Jun25 06) Field Notebook Handout (Microsoft Word 27kB Jun25 06)
Teaching Notes and Tips
It is also important to warn students not to look directly at the sun, and to use the proper shades on the sextant.
Other hints are covered in the "Context" section.
In the field notes, I look for the following:
- Does the student include notes on the methods used in lab, and do those notes include appropriate detail such that another student could repeat the exercise? This entails not only clear writing and drawing, but rational organization of the student's field notes.
- Are all of the measurements written clearly? This includes labeling what is being measured and units of measurement.
- Are the calculations clearly written and correct overall? Some mistakes are OK, as long as all work is shown.
- Are the graphs clear, with labeled axes, titles, and units of measurement?
- Are all of the questions in the lab answered? Are the answers correct? Do the answers demonstrate the student's thought process, or do they simply state an answer without reasoning?
Students are awarded a "check" for each lab if they fulfill these requirements to an adequate degree (e.g. notes are well organized and clear, but answers to questions do not go into great detail about reasoning), a "check-plus" for an exceptional lab, and a "check-minus" for a lab that seriously lacks in one of the areas described above. Students are warned at the beginning of the semester that a "check-minus" means "see me."
For the collective assessment, 80% of the class will be able to:
- Draw the flagpole and shadow to scale, and measure solar angle from the drawing.
- Correctly measure solar altitude.
- Correctly graph solar altitude in questions 9 and 11, and present graphs clearly.
- Choose at least 3 of the appropriate pieces of data to collect for question 7.
- Describe the relationship between temperature and solar altitude (question 14) for San Diego.
- Qualitatively predict temperature for 72 degrees N.
This semester, I began using formal lab write-ups as well. Lab write-ups synthesized data from a series of lab exercises (or a multi-week exercise) designed to investigate a single topic. The individual assessment process for lab reports is slightly more formal than for lab notes, and involves allotments of points for sections of the report (e.g. a certain number of points for the "methods" section, etc.).