Interseismic deformation: Crustal deformation between large earthquakes

Shimon Wdowinski
,
University of Miami

Summary

This assignment is based on real geodetic data measured in central California across the San Andreas Fault. It will get the students acquainted with geodetic observations, basic data analysis methods, and earthquake mechanics.

Context

Audience

upper level undergraduate class in geophysics for geology major (limited quantitative background)
Designed for a geophysics course

Skills and concepts that students must have mastered

The assignment is based on some knowledge about crustal deformation, the earthquake deformation cycle, and geodetic observations.

The assignment requires prior knowledge/skills in the followings:
1. Basic math—what is arctan, and its range of solutions (-pi/2 to pi/2).
2. Basic physics—what is vector, decomposing vectors into two components.
3. Basic statistics—Calculating average and standard deviations. Something that not too many people know adding uncertainties, when adding or subtracting vectors. In that case, we add the variance (standard-div**2) of each vector. The new uncertainty is square-root of the added variances.
4. Basic programming and plotting skills—Excel, Matlab, or any other program. The assignment can also be solved with paper and pencil, but it is not recommended.

How the activity is situated in the course

part of a sequence of assignments

Goals

Content/concepts goals for this activity

Calculating interseismic slip-rate across the San Andreas Fault

Higher order thinking skills goals for this activity

comparison between models, estimating best-fit between observations and model, conducting sensitivity studies

Other skills goals for this activity

working in groups (optional), promoting basic programming and plotting skills—Excel, Matlab, or any other program.

Description of the activity/assignment

In this assignment the students need to calculate the interseismic slip-rate across the San Andreas Fault using three methods: nearest stations, average, and locked-fault model. The solution for the first method is straightforwards. The solution using the second method requires basic knowledge in statistics. The solution using the third and more realistic method requires basic programming and plotting skills. Comparison between calculated models and observations yields model improvement and better estimates of the intersesimic rates.

Determining whether students have met the goals

The student should solve correctly the first two methods (nearest stations and average) and show serious attents to solve using the third methods (locked fault model).

More information about assessment tools and techniques.

Download teaching materials and tips

Other Materials

Supporting references/URLs

Schmalzle, G. M., T. Dixon, R. Malservisi, and R. Govers, Strain accumulation across the Carrizo segment of the San Andreas Fault, California: Impact of laterally varying crustal properties, Journal of Geophysical Reasearch, B, Solid Earth and Planets, 111, doi:10.1029/2005JB003843, 2006.

See more Teaching Activities »