Initial Publication Date: March 31, 2017
Patrick Belmont: Using Water: Science and Society at Utah State University
Patrick Belmont instructor photo
Provenance: Patrick Belmont
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
About this course
9
students
Online materials and most Summative Assessments were completed at home.
Some supplemental lecture, Formative Assessments, and discussions were conducted during
Three 50-minute in-person sessions
per week.
Large public 4-year university
Course syllabus
This course is designed as a general-education investigation of the importance of water to the existence of life on Earth, and the qualities of water that lead to its unusual but critical properties. The first part of the course provides a basic scientific background for understanding water movement, occurrence, and behavior, through a series of interactive activities. The second part of the course draws upon this scientific framework to understand the relationships between water and human activities.
Course goals:
Upon successfully completing this course, students will be prepared to:
- effectively describe the two-way relationship between water resources and human society: how water availability and quality affect economic opportunities and human well-being and how human activity affects water resources;
- knowledgeably explain the distribution and dynamics of water at the surface and in the subsurface of Earth, and how the distribution and characteristics are expected to change over the next 50 years;
- identify appropriate data collection practices for a variety of hydrologic data, synthesize and analyze data from multiple sources, and interpret the results;
- develop strategies and best practices to decrease water stress and increase water quality;
- thoughtfully evaluate information and policy statements regarding the current and future predicted state of water resources, and communicate their evaluations in terms that can be understood by the general public.
The course consists of 10 modules divided into three topical sections:
- Fresh Water: Scarcity or Surfeit?
- Freshwater Resources—A Global Perspective
- Climatology of Water
- Physical Hydrology
- Rivers and Watersheds
- Climate and Drought
- Dam It All!
- Groundwater Hydrology
- Social Science of Water
- What is in Your Water?
- Cities in Peril: Dealing with Water Scarcity
- Water and Politics
- Solving the Water Crisis?
A Success Story in Building Student Engagement
The
Water, Science and Society online course materials were the primary materials for readings and assignments in my class. The class was relatively small (nine students) and discussion-oriented. Overall, students found the curriculum engaging and enlightening. Students really enjoyed the active learning components, especially the Darcy Tube experiments and the in-class debates about dams.
My Experience Teaching with InTeGrate Materials
In general, we found that having one 75-minute class session was not enough, and three 50-minute sessions provided enough time, but were too broken up for some of the in-class activities. So two 75-minute sessions seems like the right balance. One session each week can be used for mini-lectures and working through the formative assessments and providing feedback to the students. The other session can be used for in-class activities.
I taught the material as a hybrid class with students working through the module content and most of the formative assessments on their own. We had three 50-minute periods scheduled each week, though some periods were optional attendance so I could work more closely with students who had a more difficult time learning the material. Typically the first class period of each module was used for micro-lectures (10–30 min) to provide additional detail or examples or extend the material in the module. The last class period of each module was typically used for the summative assessment. The middle class period was optional or used to work through formative assessments and/or for class discussion. All content was based on the InTeGrate Materials from Water, Science and Society.
Module 1
-
I used class time to provide some overview on water in the western United States and specifically in northern Utah. Students completed the readings and formative assessments independently and completed their water journals. In the third class meeting of this module, students presented their water journals and results of their indirect water use and we had a class discussion about water use in Logan, Utah.
Module 2
-
Students completed the readings and formative assessments independently. During the first class period I provided a brief lecture to reinforce the reading. The second class period was optional so I could work with students who had difficulty computing changes relative humidity within a Hadley Cell. Students completed the Summative Assessment during the third class meeting and we subsequently discussed it in class.
Module 3
- Students completed the readings and formative assessments independently. Given that this is my area of expertise, I provided an extended lecture (30–40 min) on watersheds and how topography is sculpted by fluvial processes. The third class period was used for the summative assessment, for which students worked in groups of two. We had a class discussion about different ways to create contour maps and topographic profiles and discussed advantages and drawbacks of each.
Module 4
- During the first class period, I provided a brief overview of floods and droughts and used several recent examples (obtained from a Google News search) of damages from recent events around the world. Students completed the readings and most of Formative Assessment #2 independently. We did Formative Assessment #2 in class. The summative assessment was completed outside class by the students, and then we used the third class period of this module to discuss the summative assessment.
Module 5
- Students completed the readings and formative assessments independently. I briefly lectured on the benefits and environmental impacts of dams in the western United States and discussed a proposed $2 billion project to build several new dams in the nearby Bear River watershed. We also discussed dam removal and watched/discussed the trailer for the film Dam Nation. I let students self-select which dams they were going to research outside of class and gave them 10 minutes to compile notes for the debate.
Module 6.1
- Students completed the readings and formative assessments independently. I gave a micro-lecture on groundwater in the western United States and talked specifically about problems in Salt Lake City and California. Students completed the summative assessment during the second and third class meetings. I made three different Darcy Tubes, each filled with a different type of sediment (fine sand ~125 um, coarse sand ~ 500 um, and pea gravel). It was necessary to saturate the fine grained Darcy tube within the hour before class to ensure reasonably consistent flow as students were only getting ~10 mL of water for each sample. We had to review basics, such as calculating the area of a circle and the change in head. I set up a separate tutorial to work with students who had trouble with Excel. The online tutorials were helpful for most, but some still did not get it.
Module 6.2
- Students completed the readings and formative assessments independently. We worked through all of the formative assessments together in class after the students had completed them on their own. The third class period was used for the summative assessment, after which we discussed it in class as a group after they turned it in.
Module 7
- I gave an extended lecture (30–40 min) during the first class period of this module on the history and implementation of the Clean Water Act. During the second class period, we reviewed water quality data from local water bodies and discussed proposed changes in the Clean Water Act. Students completed the readings and formative assessments independently, but we discussed each of the formative assessments in class. Students completed the summative assessment outside of class, and then gave brief presentations on their contaminants during the third class period of this module.
Module 8.1
- I gave a brief lecture (20–30 min) on the history and implementation of water rights throughout the United States during the first class period of this module. During the second class period I gave a brief lecture on the Colorado River Compact and implications for Utah. We also discussed the pros and cons of possible future water development projects. Students completed the readings and formative assessments independently, but we discussed each of the formative assessments in class. Students completed the summative assessment independently, outside of class and turned it in for feedback.
Module 8.2
- I used the first class period to give a brief lecture on climate models and how we know what we know about past and future climate. I also briefly reviewed the key findings of the IPCC and discussed the essential roles of skepticism and constructive criticism in science. We had a class discussion on policy/management decision-making in an uncertain world. Students watched Cadillac Desert Part 2: American Nile independently. Students completed the readings and formative assessments independently. Students received feedback from me on the summative assessment from Module 8.1 and revised it accordingly, outside of class.
Module 9
- For the first class period of this module I had one of my colleagues with extensive experience in international water issues give a guest lecture, focusing on the Colorado River and Rio Grande. During the second class period we discussed the associated chapters in The Big Thirst. Students completed the readings and formative assessments independently. Students completed the summative assessment on their own time and I was available for individual consultation during the third class period.
Module 10
-
Students completed the readings and formative assessments independently. I gave a brief lecture on several of the solutions discussed in the module. During the second class period we had a general discussion of the solutions proposed in The Big Thirst. Students completed the summative assessment independently and each made brief presentations.
All of the material is described in the course website: https://www.e-education.psu.edu/earth107/. The advantage of having the lecture materials online is that the students come to class having read them and are ready to apply their knowledge. The professor can devote the lab time to interacting with the students, and learning where they are having difficulty, as well as making the course more relevant to each individual.
Assessments
This course makes use of formative "checkpoints" with automated feedback built in to the online materials. In addition, each module contains several more substantial formative assessments, often in the form of essays. Most instructors will want to choose from among these formative assessments, or give their students the choice of which formative assessment to complete. All summative assessments are necessary in order for the students to get the maximum benefit from each module.
Assessments description:
This course makes use of a number of different assessment elements:
- Formative Assessments with automated feedback
- "Activate Your Learning" elements have students interact with the online content, such as interpreting a graph or map.
- "Food for Thought" elements have students respond to more philosophical questions.
- "Learning Checkpoints" are short-answer or multiple-choice questions that review or apply the content as it is provided.
- Formative Assessments to be turned in
- The students complete these at home and bring to the lab/discussion session with them. Some formative assessments involve numerical calculations, some involve interpretation of graphs or figures, and many are short essays. They are generally used to prepare the students for the in-class labs, activities, or discussions.
- Summative Assessments
- These are generally completed during the in-class lab/discussion session, although some preparatory work may be required before coming to class. The goal is to synthesize and apply the topics covered in each module. Summative assessments are designed to encourage students to interact with real data, in some cases to create their own data sets, and to verbalize some of the larger societal problems posed by water accessibility issues. Examples include:
- Water Use Journal
- Hadley Cell Analysis
- Topographic Map Interpretation
- Hometown Flood Hazard Assessment
- Dams Debate
- Darcy Tube Experiments
- Hydraulic Head Analysis
- Water Contaminant Fact Sheet
- Water Portfolio for Phoenix, AZ
- Short Paper on Water Sharing Across Borders
- Capstone Project
- Students develop a comprehensive Water Portfolio to serve a water-critical urban area of their choosing.
Outcomes
I taught a course similar to this in the past. There are many topics to cover and no existing textbook covers them adequately, so I was hoping to bring all these topics into a single, coherent picture that links them together. Additionally, I was hoping to make what had been more of a lecture-based course into an active-learning, discussion-oriented course with only a modest amount of lecture content to emphasize the key points. In my own evaluation and the evaluations of the students, it succeeded in all of those areas.
Explore other InTeGrate Instructor Stories