Initial Publication Date: July 15, 2016
Manoj Jha: Using Water Sustainability in Cities at North Carolina A&T University
About this course
Water Resource Engineering Design is an upper-level course that supports students with the knowledge and practice examples for the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) licensing exam.
13
students
Two 75-minute lecture
sessions per week
Large land grant university
Syllabus (Acrobat (PDF) 186kB Sep28 15)
This course involves the application of hydrologic and hydraulic principles in the analysis and design of water resources systems. Topics include rainfall-runoff analysis (design storm, streamflow generation), design of urban landscapes (water efficiency), design of low-impact developments (green infrastructures), design of open channel (efficient and natural channel), flood control structures (reservoir, spillway), water distribution systems (demand, pipe flow analysis, Hardy-Cross, pumps), and storm and sanitary sewer systems (design flow, culvert, gutter).
Course Goals and Content
The course goal is to educate students interested in water infrastructures with the concepts of fundamental design methods. This course also supports students with the knowledge and practice examples for the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) licensing exam. It meets departmental goals of providing students with design experiences of water infrastructures. This course also supports the institutional goal of enhancing analytical, critical thinking, and communication skills.
A Success Story in Building Student Engagement
This module worked well in teaching students the basics and fundamentals of water sustainability in the setting of urban development. I used this module in the second half of the senior level design course (all units via nine classes). The class had 13 students with backgrounds mostly in civil engineering and some in environmental sciences.
All units were designed well and fulfill the learning objectives. I believe that this module helped students learn the given topics significantly better than what would have been done traditionally.
My Experience Teaching with InTeGrate Materials
All units were designed well and fulfill the learning objectives. It should be noted that these units are developed by educators from four different universities across the country and so involved a wide range of thought process, material presentation, and teaching techniques. Proper use will require understanding of the subject matter before bringing it to the classroom. I had to modify slides, exercises, teaching techniques, time required, etc., at times to fit to the type of students and their interests. I believe that this module helped students learn the topics significantly better than what would have been done traditionally. Most importantly, they were able to interact with each other frequently.
Relationship of InTeGrate Materials to My Course
I used this module in the second half of the senior level design course (all units via nine classes). Unit 9 was used as a term project as a means for the assessment of the entire module. Since it was the first version of the module, I had to modify slides, exercises, teaching techniques, and time required to complete units, at times to fit to the type of students and their interests. The experiences helped us revise and improve the module.
Unit 1
- No modification. Suggestion: instructor needs to have a good understanding of the mind map idea before introducing this to the class.
Unit 2
- Pre-class quiz worked very well. Class example on water budget was introduced after explaining the unit conversion process between various units of hydrological processes (rainfall, streamflow, etc.).
Unit 3
- Lecture slides were cut down significantly to reduce the scope of discussion. In-class activity worked well.
Unit 4
- I had to split this unit into two classes (Part 1 and Part 2 as indicated in the handout). It is a comprehensive unit and can be expanded depending upon the type of students and their background knowledge.
Unit 5
- It was a difficult unit to implement due to the use of Excel sheet in the classroom. Also, the topic and exercise were found too easy for senior-level students
Unit 6
- This unit should be combined with Unit 5. Teaching this stand-alone may create confusion on the use of pre-existing data.
Unit 7
- It worked well the way it is. Example of using NSC calculator is very simple (good for freshman- or sophomore-level students), but complexity should be increased for higher-level students.
Unit 8
Unit 9
- Used as a class group project and worked well. No modifications.
Assessments
Assessments included pre-class quiz, in-class activities and post-class assignments. Unit 9 was designed to be conducted as a term project that would assess the learning outcomes of all units (1 through 8). After the first round of implementation in our courses (at four universities) during fall of 2014 and spring of 2015, assessment portion has been improved/revised for the better.
Outcomes
This course module helped students navigate many aspects of sustainable urban development from the point of view of water resources impact and assessment. Most students generally did well, while some found it difficult due to the requirement of pre-class reading and quiz.
Explore other InTeGrate Instructor Stories