Advanced exploration of the ecological consequences of trophic downgrading in mixed/short grass prairies in North America
- Students will understand
- that ecosystems are dynamic and change is continual.
- significant patterns in and impacts of climate change during the late Pleistocene and Holocene in North America.
- how climate change, human action, and alterations in species distribution have collectively influenced the distribution and abundance of grassland ecosystems in North America.
- Students will be able to use the Neotoma database and ArcGIS to investigate the role that "ecosystem engineers" play in driving ecosystem change. In particular, they will be able to generate distribution maps and compute the overlap of geographic ranges among multiple taxa.
- Students will develop hypotheses about the role played by top consumers in shaping observed variations over time in grassland ecosystems.
- Students will think critically about the possibilities and limitations of using a multi-proxy database such as Neotoma to investigate questions about climate change, ecology, and human action in North America.
Context for Use
This activity is intended for undergraduates and can be done over several class periods. Before beginning, students need to know how to use the Neotoma database to find data about the distributions of species in a given time period. The activity What are the ecological consequences of trophic downgrading in mixed/short grass prairies in North America? is designed to introduce those skills, in preparation for this activity.
Following this activity, students could be encouraged to conduct independent or small group research into a variety of related questions. See the document with a few suggested research topics in the Teaching Materials section, below.
Description and Teaching Materials
In this activity, students explore the potential interactions between different species by computing the area of the geographic range and overlap within and between species over time.
Download the student handout in PDF or Word format:
- lesson plan (Acrobat (PDF) 11.6MB Apr14 16)
- Lesson plan (Microsoft Word 2007 (.docx) 12.1MB Apr14 16)
As a follow-up activity, you could encourage students to conduct independent or small group research into a variety of related questions. Download a few suggested research topics (Microsoft Word 2007 (.docx) 19kB Apr14 16).
Teaching Notes and Tips
The activity What are the ecological consequences of trophic downgrading in mixed/short grass prairies in North America? was designed as an introduction to this one. In that exercise, students i) generate distribution maps and ii) analyze changes in the distributions of species over time.
Because there are multiple reasonable ways to draw the geographic range of taxa in the ArcGIS component, instructors should expect there to be variation within results.
References and Resources
Asner, G.P. et al. 2015. Ecosystem-scale effects of megafauna in African savannas. -Ecography, 38: 001-013.
Bakker, E.S. et al. 2015a. Combining paleo-data and modern exclosure experiments to assess the impact of megafauna extinctions on woody vegetation. –Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113: 847-855.
Bakker E.S. et al. 2015b. Assessing the role of large herbivores in the structuring and functioning of freshwater and marine ecosystems. -Ecography, 39: 162-179.
Bakker E.S. et al. 2006. Herbivore impact on grassland plant diversity depends on habitat productivity and herbivore size. -Ecol. Ltrs. 9: 780-788.
Barnosky, A.D. 2008. Megafauna biomass tradeoff as a driver of Quaternary and future extinctions. - Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105: 11543-11548.
Barnosky, A.D. et al. 2015. The variable impact of Late Quaternary defaunation in causing ecological state shifts in North and South America. -Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113: 856-861.
Calder, W.A. 1984 Size, function and life history. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Conservation Paleobiology.
Dietl GP, Flessa KW (eds). 2009. Conservation Paleobiology: using the past to manage for the future. Paleontological Society Papers, 15, 285 pp.
Dietl GP, Flessa KW. 2011. Conservation paleobiology: putting the dead to work. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 26(1): 30-37.
Dirzo, R. et al. 2014. Defaunation in the Anthropocene. -Science 345: 401–406.
Donlan, C.J. et al. 2006. Pleistocene Rewilding: an optimistic agenda for twenty-first century conservation. -Am. Nat. 168: 660-681.
Donlan, C.J. et al. 2005. Re-wilding North America. -Nature 436: 913–914.
Doughty, C.E. 2013. Preindustrial human impacts on regional and global environment. –Ann. Rev. Environ. Resources 38: 503-527.
Doughty, C.E., Faurby, S., and Svenning, J-C. 2015a. Did megafauna extinctions affect savanna woody cover in South America? -Ecography, 39: 213-222.
Doughty, C.E., Wolf, A., and Field, C.B. 2010. Biophysical feedbacks between the Pleistocene megafauna extinction and climate: the first human-induced global warming? –Geophys. Res. Ltrs. 37: L15703.
Doughty, C.E. et al. 2015d. Megafauna extinction, tree species range reduction, and carbon storage in Amazonian forests. -Ecography, 39: 194-203.
Estes, J.A. et al. 2011. Trophic downgrading of planet earth. -Science 333: 301–306.
Faurby, S. and Svenning, J.-C. 2015. Historic and prehistoric human-driven extinctions have reshaped global mammal diversity patterns. – Divers. Distrib. 21:1155–1166.
Flessa KW. 2002. Conservation paleobiology. American Paleontologist, 10: 2-5.
Gill, J.L. 2014. Ecological impacts of the late Quaternary megaherbivore extinctions. -New Phytologist 201 :1163-1169.
Graham, R.W. and Grimm, E.C. 1990. Effects of global climate change on the patterns of terrestrial biological communities. -Trends Ecol. Evol. 5: 289-292.
Jepson, P. 2015. A rewilding agenda for Europe: creating a network of experimental reserves. -Ecography,39: DOI:10.1111/ecog.01602.
Johnson, C.N. 2009. Ecological consequences of late Quaternary extinctions of megafauna. -Proc. Roy. Soc. B 276: 2509–2519.
Johnson, C.N. et al. 2015. Geographic variation in the ecological effects of extinction of Australia's Pleistocene megafauna. -Ecography, 39: 109-116.
Jørgensen, D. 2015. Rethinking rewilding. Geoforum, in press; doi://10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.11.016
Koch, P.L. and Barnosky, A.D. 2006. Late Quaternary extinctions: state of the debate. –Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37: 215–250.
Martin, P.S. 2005. Twilight of the mammoths: ice age extinctions and rewilding America. -Univ. California Press.
Martin, P. S. and Burney, D.A. 1999. Bring back the elephants! Wild Earth 9: 57–64.
Martin, P.S. and Klein, R.G. 1984. Quaternary extinctions: a prehistoric revolution. - Univ. Arizona Press.
Oliveira-Santos, L.G.R. and Fernandez, F.A.S. 2010. Pleistocene rewilding, Frankenstein ecosystems, and an alternative conservation agenda. –Conser. Biol. 24 :4-5.
Owen-Smith, N. 1988. Megaherbivores: The influence of very large body size on ecology. -Cambridge Univ. Press.
Pardi, M.I. and Smith, F.A. 2015. Biotic responses of canids to the terminal Pleistocene megafauna extinction. -Ecography, in press.
Peters, R.H. 1983 The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, F.A., Elliott, S.M. and Lyons, S.K. 2010. Methane emissions from extinct megafauna. -Nature Geosci.3: 374-375.
Smith, F.A. et al. 2003. Body mass of late Quaternary mammals. -Ecology 84: 3402.
Smith, F.A. et al. 2015a. Exploring the influence of ancient and historic megaherbivore extirpations on the global methane budget. -Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113: 874-879.
Smith, F.A. et al. 2015b. Unraveling the consequences of the terminal Pleistocene megafauna extinction on mammal community assembly. -Ecography, 39: 223-239.
Terborgh, J. and Estes, J.A. (eds.) 2010. Trophic Cascades: Predators, Prey, and the Changing Dynamics of Nature. -Island Press.
Terborgh, J. et al. 2015b. Megafaunal influences on tree recruitment in African equatorial forests. -Ecography, 39: 180-186.
Van Valkenburgh, B. et al. 2015. The impact of large terrestrial carnivores on Pleistocene ecosystems. -Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113: 862-867.
Zimov, S.A. et al. 1995. Steppe-tundra transition: a herbivore-driven biome shift at the end of the Pleistocene. -Am. Nat. 146: 765–794.