2025 Georgia Institute: Teaching Students to Evaluate Sources and Claims
Join us June 2-5, 2025 for a three-day Institute for middle and high school teachers. The Institute will explore and connect two types of curricular materials that deepen students' understanding of how to evaluate socioscientific issues, such as the climate crisis, energy use, and food security, using instructional scaffolds called Lateral Reading and Model-Evidence Link Diagrams.
We are looking for school-based pairs of teachers who have overlapping student populations to apply as a team. Our vision is to partner one science teacher (particularly in Earth or environmental sciences) with either a social studies or English language arts teacher so the same student population experiences both types of curricular materials. Solo applicants from any of the three content areas will also be considered.
There will be two pre-Institute webinars (May 5 and May 19, both 7-8 p.m. EDT) and a 3-day Institute June 2-5 at Forsyth County School District Office Building, Cumming, GA. Complete participation in the webinars and the Institute will result in a stipend of $900 per teacher. Up to two additional webinars will be offered during the 2023-2024 school year for an additional $100 stipend. That is a total of $1,000 in stipend funding.
Application Deadline: April 4, 2025. Applicants will be notified of a decision by April 21.
Questions can be directed to mel2institutes@gmail.com. We hope to see your application soon!
Click Here to Apply Now
Institute Flyer
Share this flyer with colleagues who might be interested in attending.
- 2025 Georgia Application Flyer (Acrobat (PDF) 185kB Feb19 25)
The Lateral Reading-Model-Evidence Link Diagrams project is supported in part by the NSF under Grant Nos. DRL-2201012, DRL-2346657, DRL-2201015, DRL-2201016, DRL-2201017, and DRL-2201018. Previous support came from Grant Nos. DRL-2201013, DRL-2027376, DRL-1721041, and DRL-1316057. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the NSF's views.