Prajukti (juk) Bhattacharyya: Humans' Dependence on Earth's Mineral Resources in Geolgy 301: Environmental Geology at the University of Wisconsin--Whitewater
×
juk studying Hawaiian lava flow up close and personal
Provenance: PRAJUKTI Bhattacharyya, University of Wisconsin-Whitewater Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
This course is an introduction to the environmental aspect of the geosciences. It focuses mainly on the impacts of the natural environment on humans and vice versa.
Apply the method of scientific inquiry for studying current environmental issues
Diagram the interconnected nature of environmental, social, and economic issues pertinent to resource management and sustainability
Use critical thinking skills to make personal decisions about resource consumption and environmentally responsible behavior
Explain to a general audience how understanding geological processes and principles can help address environmental issues, especially those related to extraction and consumption of mineral and fossil fuel resources
Work collaboratively with others by taking multiple points of view into account to address environmental impacts of resource consumption and natural hazards
Course Content
This course explores environmental geology, including:
human population growth and its impacts on the environment, including economic realities and mineral resources
earthquakes, volcanoes, landslides, and tsunamis---causes, effects, and mitigation
mining and economic geology
energy resources---formation, extraction, alternative energy sources, and environmental impacts
electronic waste issues
A Success Story in Building Student Engagement
The grand challenges facing society today demand an ability to think across disciplines. This module provides an alternative way to teach the rocks and minerals component in traditional introductory-level geoscience courses. The focus shifts from identification and description of rocks and minerals to the social, economic, and environmental impacts of using mineral resources. The students are shown how the study of geology fits into the "big picture" through a series of data-based, hands-on, collaborative activities. This module was piloted in a nonmajor environmental geology course.
Student engagement was phenomenal when I tested the module activities in my classroom. The students were excited to discuss current local and global issues revolving around mineral resource exploration, extraction, and use, and to see how the information provided in the classroom can be applied to solve real-world problems.
I video recorded one 75-minute class period when I conducted the in-class activity for Unit 5 of this module during Spring Semester 2014. A colleague reviewed the video according to the classroom observation protocol for STEM courses created by Smith et al., (2013). One of the purpose of this protocol is to characterize how faculty and students spend time during class and how much active learning, as opposed to passive lecturing, happens during class. The pie charts below show that I used only 21% of a 75-minute class period (approximately 16 minutes) for lecturing. The rest of the time was used for group work and discussion, and students were actively engaged in asking and answering questions. This shows the effectiveness of the module for increasing student engagement during class.
Each of the units have alternate activities that are designed to the learning goals of the specific unit. I used the activities most suitable for my class size and course format. Instructors teaching a lab-lecture course can use the activities that best meet their needs, as opposed to activities best suited to small, lecture-based courses.
My Experience Teaching with InTeGrate Materials
This module was used to highlight the necessity and impacts of mineral resource exploration, extraction, and use to meet today's demands. Most of my students were non-science majors, with little or no background in geology. It was necessary to scaffold the information about what defines a mineral to a geologist, to how economics drives the definition of a mineral resource and a mineral reserve, various geologic processes forming selected economic mineral deposits, ultimately culminating to specific case studies of social and environmental impacts of mineral resource extraction, processing, and use.
The entire module is broken down in six discrete units. Each unit had a variety of activities, including in-class group activities, pre-class reading, and post-class homework assignments. Each of these activities are flexible enough to either be standalone activities or to be part of the whole unit. Each unit was designed to fit a standard 50-minute class period, but those were easily modified to fit 75-minute class periods by assigning in-class video activities as pre-, or post-class homework activities.
Each activity has a tentative time period assigned to it, but those time frames are to be used as guidelines only. Those time constraints can and should be be modified, depending on specific classroom situations. When I was piloting the module, there were more than one instance where the students got excited about the topic, and I decided to encourage vigorous group discussions and student excitement rather than cut short just to keep to a specific time schedule. Since the module is flexible enough to modify activities, that was not a problem.
I did activity 3 (Economic Development and Resource Use) as a small-group activity to introduce the module. Since I covered population explosion and related issues at the beginning of the course separate from the module activities, this served to review and reinforce those concepts before delving specifically into mineral resource use. I used the "minerals and products" activity in a slightly modified version: I distributed minerals and corresponding products on different tables in a way that no single table contained the entire set of minerals and corresponding products made from them. I then asked students to work with a partner to complete the list of minerals and the products made from them. This worked because of the small class size and because we have a room where students can walk around easily. This generated a lot of discussion, and I was able to interact with students one-on-one.
I did not use every single activity provided in the module. For the sake of time and logistics, I did not use the pre- and post-class homework for Unit 3 but opted to use a modified version of the muffin mining activity (in-class activity 1) during Spring Semester 2013. During Fall semester 2013 and Spring Semester 2014, I opted to use a modified version of in-class activity 2 for Unit 3 without using activity 1, or the pre- and post-class homework assignments. This did not diminish the effectiveness of the module in any way.
I changed the sequence of the units to fit the overall theme of the course. I went directly to Unit 5 (sulfide mining) after Unit 3 (mining issues) since Unit 3 covers the issue of acid rock drainage, which is more pertinent to impacts of sulfide mining than the topics covered in Unit 4 (resources created by sedimentary rock).
Since phosphate ore deposits in Florida were formed by sedimentary processes, I covered Unit 4 to go over sedimentary ore-forming processes before I covered issues related to phosphorus mining and use.
I did not cover the sand mining activity during Spring Semester 2014, however. I covered the sedimentary processes (mechanical and chemical weathering, erosion, deposition, compaction, and lithification) using the PowerPoint, and a classroom demo. I used the salt mining activity in class, and then straightaway moved on to Unit 6: phosphorus mining activity, and complemented it with two other relevant place-based mining issues that are also relevant to sedimentary ore-forming processes: the taconite mining in northern Wisconsin, and frack-sand mining in western Wisconsin. The impact of the module was not lessened in any way because of this deviation. I would leave it up to the instructor to modify the module topic(s) and/or the sequence as they see fit.
I covered topics on plate tectonics in my course separate from the module activities. This was beneficial for covering Unit 5, which deals with the formation processes of economic minerals of igneous and metamorphic origins. This unit needs preexisting knowledge of plate tectonics, and the PowerPoint presentation associated with the unit covers the topic of plate tectonics in more detail than could be covered within the time frame of the module. Covering the basic principles of plate tectonics prior to covering this unit helped scaffold student knowledge and fit the activities within the specified time frame.
I did not fit in unit 6, phosphorus activity, within the two-week time frame of module due to time constraints, but did it in conjunction of another place-based activity not part of the module to better fit the flow of my course. During Spring Semester 2014, I expanded the module over a three-week period to incorporate mining-related local current issues (iron mining in northern Wisconsin, and frack-sand mining in western Wisconsin) that fit in the overall theme of the module. I also incorporated bauxite mining (another ore mineral formed by sedimentary processes) at the end of this unit to segue to other topics (such as deforestation, recycling, and waste management) that I was covering in this course. I would leave it up to the individual instructor to use the activities in any sequence that best fits their individual courses.
Assessments
I had my students create concept maps in groups from the very beginning of the semester to get them familiar with the basic organization of concept maps and how to label the arrows connecting the nodes. This reduced a lot of confusion for the students when I asked them to complete the concept map as part of assessing the module.
Formative assessments were embedded in each individual activity. The group activities involved questions to be answered as a group, which were then assessed. The homework assignments were collected and graded. Each of the six units had individual assessment instruments. After the module, summative assessment was conducted in the form of an overarching concept map on mineral resource formation, extraction, use, and impacts of those on the environment and the society. There were also embedded exam questions to assess whether the learning goals of the module were met.
Outcomes
×
Provenance: PRAJUKTI Bhattacharyya, University of Wisconsin-Whitewater Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
I wanted to expose my students to the complex web connecting various demands by society, economics, geology, environmental issues, and natural resource extraction and use. I wanted them to see how they themselves stand at the center of that web and the impacts of their own actions. I wanted them to be curious and want to learn more about these topics.
Based on student comments on their final self-assessment report, I think I was successful in meeting these goals.
Example of student comment
"(The design of the class had) a lot of emphasis on the triple bottom line. Personally, I am very environmentally minded. A lot of times, people like meget so caught up in the topic that directly impacts them; they forget that it is connected with the other two, social and economic. Usually social impacts speak for themselves but I personally forget about the economic impacts. Since all three of them are linked together, we need to account for them. Every problem has a social, economic, and environmental impact, and we need to reach common ground for all three, and people (including environmentalists) need to realize this."
×
Provenance: PRAJUKTI Bhattacharyya, University of Wisconsin-Whitewater Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
×
Provenance: PRAJUKTI Bhattacharyya, University of Wisconsin-Whitewater Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Pedagogically, I hoped to create a learning environment where multiple active learning strategies are used to deliver content. The module was highly successful in meeting that goal. These pie charts show the classroom time breakdown in terms instructor activities as well as student activities during a representative 75-minute class period. It shows that the students were involved in a variety of learning activities, either with me or with each other all through the class time.