Isotope Hydrograph Separation
This activity was selected for the On the Cutting Edge Exemplary Teaching Collection
Resources in this top level collection a) must have scored Exemplary or Very Good in all five review categories, and must also rate as “Exemplary” in at least three of the five categories. The five categories included in the peer review process are
- Scientific Accuracy
- Alignment of Learning Goals, Activities, and Assessments
- Pedagogic Effectiveness
- Robustness (usability and dependability of all components)
- Completeness of the ActivitySheet web page
For more information about the peer review process itself, please see https://serc.carleton.edu/teachearth/activity_review.html.
This page first made public: Jul 22, 2016
Conceptual Learning Outcomes
2) Students will be able to identify and discuss uncertainties in the approach taken and possible alternate approaches that address some of the uncertainties
3) Students develop quantitative reasoning and data analysis skills
Practical Learning Outcomes
2) Students will be able to download and manipulate data from Hydroclient.
Student Time Required
Supporting Reference Documents and Files
- Vitvar, T., Aggarawal, P.K., and McDonnell, J.J. A review of isotope applications in catchment hydrology.
- Klaus, J. and McDonnell, J.J. 2013. Hydrograph separation using stable isotopes: review and evaluation. J. of Hydrology. 505: 47-64.
- PDF of slides used in Watershed Hydrology class at Kent State University
PDF of slides used in Watershed Hydrology class at Kent State University (Acrobat (PDF) 1.1MB Jul18 16)
The drainage area of the West Branch of the Mahoning River at Jenning's Woods is 19.6 mi2. If you are interested, you can use StreamStats to delineate the study watershed: http://water.usgs.gov/osw/streamstats/ohio.html
Isotope data: An ISCO auto-sampler was deployed in the study area on 21 March 2014 and programmed to collect 1 L samples at 1 or 2 hour intervals after triggering by an increase in water level (i.e., signaling a storm event producing a rising hydrograph). The 24 bottles in the autosampler were swapped out between storms on 31 March, 4 April, 6 April, and 9 April 2014. These samples were supplemented by grab samples collected during site visits, and a pre-event grab sample collected on 21 March. In addition to the stream water samples, precipitation was collected 13 km to the west, in Kent, in a backyard raingage (KOH). Precipitation samples were collected approximately every 12 hours during and following storms. Before analysis, all samples were filtered and stored in parafilmed, scintillation vials with minimal head space. Sample vials were labeled with site code (Jennings or KOH), ISCO bottle number (or grab), collection date and time. Precipitation and stream waters samples were analyzed for oxygen and hydrogen stable isotopes in water, using a Picarro L-2130i in the Watershed Hydrology lab at Kent State University. Analytical uncertainty is +/- 0.08 per mil for oxygen and +/- 1.0 per mill for hydrogen isotopes.
Discharge data: Attached to the ISCO auto-sampler is an area-velocity meter, and a pressure transducer is deployed within the same cross-section. These timeseries, in combination with a surveyed cross-section, surveyed longitudinal profile, previous estimates of Manning's n, and a limited number of direct discharge points, were used to create a discharge record for the site. There will be some uncertainty in these discharge values, but you do not need to further consider them in your analyses.
Steps within this lesson
- Discover and download discharge, precipitation, and isotope data for Jenning's Woods using Hydroclient
- Explore the data by creating graphs of discharge and water isotopes
- Identify appropriate endmember compositions for hydrograph separation
- Calculate the amount of new event water in the stream at each time point using isotope and discharge data
(15 points for formatting, 110 points for content below)
1. Briefly (<1 page) summarize the field and laboratory procedures for data collection and analysis. (10 points)
2. Define your endmember isotopic compositions for old and new water for the event that spanned April 3-6, 2014. Decide how you will handle the precipitation values. (15 points)
3. Rearrange Qs𝛿s = Qn𝛿n + Qo𝛿o to solve for the amount of "new" event water in the stream at each time point.
4. Create a hydrograph of the April 3-6, 2014 event showing the total discharge and fractions of new and old water at each time point. (10 points)
5. Calculate the % of peak flow for the April 3-6, 2014 event that is from new water, and explain your calculations. (10 points)
6. Calculate the % of total storm flow for the April 3-6, 2014 event that is from new water, and explain your calculations. (10 points)
7. Explain why successful hydrograph separation of the other sampled events might be more difficult. (10 points)
8. Consider and discuss the sources of error and uncertainty in this hydrograph separation (the references provided should help). You don't need to do a formal uncertainty analysis, but you should be able to discuss the relative magnitude of multiple uncertainty sources and the direction in which they change the new and old water fractions. (15 points)
9. Discuss alternate approaches (that could have been taken in the field, lab, or data analysis) that address some of the uncertainties you have identified. (10 points)
10. Discuss what your hydrograph separations tell you about flowpaths and dynamics of the West Branch of the Mahoning River. Draw on all of the knowledge you've gained in class, plus any external references you may want to use. Suggest directions for future research on the watershed hydrology of the study area. (20 points)