The Visualizing the Liberal Arts project website has not been significantly updated since 2013. We are preserving the web pages here because they still contain useful and ideas and content. But be aware that it may have out of date information.

Form and Content I

Pierre Hecker
Author Profile
Initial Publication Date: December 11, 2009

Summary

In this assignment, a student begins by picking a single shot or short sequence of shots from one of the movies we have seen as a class. Next, the student writes a brief, technically accurate description of the shot. Finally, the student explains how the formal choices and components of the shot generate specific meaning.

Share your modifications and improvements to this activity through the Community Contribution Tool »

Learning Goals

  • to train students to see more consciously.
  • to have students move from a rote memorization of technical terms to meaningful use of those terms; i.e. to simultaneously expand their critical vocabulary and their ability to make use of that vocabulary.
  • to have students increase their understanding of how visual meaning can be generated.
  • to improve the degree of clarity, specificity, and conciseness in student writing.
  • to teach students the difference between observation and argumentation, or between description and analysis.

Description and Teaching Materials

empty

Teaching Notes and Tips

Modeling the assignment, showing what a successful completed one looks like, is probably important.

Assessment

The shot:

  • Is the example apt and well chosen?
  • How accurate is the description?
  • How complete is the description?
  • How sophisticated is the use of technical vocabulary in the description?

The writing:

  • Is the writing clear and idiomatic?
  • Does it make appropriate use of diction, syntax, and grammar?
  • Has the paper been fully and properly copy-edited?
  • Are there careless grammar or spelling mistakes?

The analysis:

  • Is the example challenging, original, compelling, thought-provoking, or interesting, or is it obvious or pedestrian?
  • Is the case being made plausible? Is it, on the one hand, too simplistic or, on the other, a case of overreading?
  • Does the evidence justify the interpretation?
  • Does it persuade?
  • Has the reader learned something?

References and Resources

empty