A Survey Paper: Topics in Economic Growth and Development
Summary
This paper is designed to help students develop deeper understanding of a topic within economic growth and/or economic development and potentially lead to the development of a thesis proposal. This paper does not require students to complete an entire research project, but only asks them to develop a feasible research question based on a review of the literature.
Learning Goals
In this paper, students will explore the economic literature and choose one topic to explore. They will identify the relevant influential papers, organize and summarize the contributions in an easy to understand manner, and provide direction on how the literature is evolving. In this sense, students are only doing the first 5 steps of the research process.
Context for Use
Teaching Materials
Teaching Notes and Tips
Assessment
- A clearly defined topic and well described connections to Economic Growth and/or Economic Development.
- Identified the influential papers (both seminal works and papers pushing the frontier of our understanding) within the peer-reviewed literature.
- Organized the literature review in a logical fashion
- Clearly and concisely described the contribution of each paper to the literature and how it relates to other papers
- Used the cited papers to provide context for what are the yet unanswered questions
- Identified and detailed one feasible senior thesis question developed from the literature review
- Overall paper had excellent spelling, grammar, flow, and proper references.
A paper receiving a B will have achieved most of the above points and nearly achieved the balance. An example is the student identifies a senior thesis question but the thesis question is simply stated not detailed.
A paper earning a C will have achieved some of the above points and nearly achieved most, but fails to address or achieve one or more points. An example is the student does not list a senior thesis question. Another example of a C paper is the student identifies the influential works but does not summarize them in a manner where is it clear the student understood the contribution of the work.