Integrating Research and Education > Teaching Phase Equilibria > Activity Models

Activity Models

Dex Perkins, University of North Dakota; Andrea Koziol, University of Dayton; and Dave Mogk, Montana State University

Introduction


Minerals may have many different compositions in nature and, therefore, the compositions of minerals must be considered when we apply thermodynamics to natural systems. Many minerals occur as solid solutions of two (or more) end members. For example, garnet is typically a solid solution of grossular (Ca3Al2Si3O12), pyrope (Mg3Al2Si3O12), almandine (Fe3Al2Si3O12), spessartine (Mn3Al2Si3O12), and even more end members.

CAS system Figure 1. Petrogenetic grid for the system CaO-Al2O3-SiO2.
Download PDF (Acrobat (PDF) 26kB May27 07)
Figure 1 shows reactions in the CaO-Al2O3-SiO2 system, many of which limit the stability of grossular. However, natural garnets are rarely close to pure grossular, so this diagram must be modified if it is to be applied to natural systems. The general rule is that the more dilute a mineral, the less reactive it is. Another way to think of this relationship is that impurities (additional components) added to a mineral will tend to extend its stability field (think of what happens to water when you add salt–this extends the stability of water by depressing the freezing point; this can also be understood by applying the concept of Le Chatelier's principle from chemistry). The position of any of the equilibria represented by the univariant curves on this diagram are necessarily related to the composition of the phases (usually reported as mole fraction, X, for minerals), and the compositions of the phases are related by the equilibrium constant as described below. Consequently, natural garnets will have greater stability than is shown for pure grossular in this diagram. All the reactions (except the Ky-And-Sil equilibria) will shift to higher temperatures for natural garnet compositions.

To appropriately address the compositional variation of minerals, and the effect of composition on mineral stability,we must introduce a new thermodynamic property, the activity of a component i in phase j: aij .

Activities are values that describe how reactive a particular end member component is for a given mineral composition. If a mineral is pure (for example, if a garnet is 100% grossular) the activity of the end member (in this example grossular) is 1. If a particular end member is only a minor part of a mineral, its activity will be very small. Activities depend, not only on composition, but also on pressure and temperature (P and T).

Plagioclase Activity Figure 2. Activity-composition relationships for plagioclase at 700oC. This diagram modified slightly from the model of Orville (1972, Am. J. Sci. 272, 234-272).
Mineral compositions are typically expressed in mole fractions. A natural garnet, for example, might be 82% almandine, 9% pyrope, 6% grossular, and 3% spessartine (Al82Py9Gr6Sp3). The activity of grossular in this garnet will be on the order of 0.06 (equivalent to 6%). In fact, if garnet behaved as an ideal solution, the activity of grossular would be exactly 0.06. However, most mineral solutions (including garnet) are not ideal solutions. Some, however, come close.

Figure 2 (right) shows activity-composition relationships for plagioclase at 700oC. The red curves are the activities; the black lines would be the activities if plagioclase behaved as an ideal solution. This diagram shows that, unless plagioclase is close to end-member anorthite or albite, the activities (reactivities) of albite and anorthite are greater than would be predicted by ideal mixing.

Some Basic Relations



Ideal and Non-ideal Behavior


Although some mineral solutions have close to ideal activities, most deviate to a lesser or greater extent. Interactions between elements in different crystallographic sites of minerals affect the energetics of the system, and so affect the ability of the components to react in the system. Consequently, in solutions (solid, liquid or gas) as the composition changes, activities may deviate significantly from ideality. This is called non-ideal mixing.

For example, consider volume as a proxy for activity in the simple case of mixing 50 ml of liquid A with 50 ml of liquid B. It seems that the final volume should be 100 ml, but in real solutions, the final volume may be 110 ml (positive deviations from ideality) or 90 ml (negative deviations from ideality). Deviations from ideality are seen, not only in volumes of mixing, but also in the Gibbs free energy of mixing. Imagine the liquid A50B50 participates in a chemical reaction. The solution may "act" as if the composition is A60B40 rather than A50B50.

Mineral End Member Activity

Many minerals exhibit non-ideal mixing because of interactions on the atomic level. For many thermodynamic calculations, this effect is large enough that it must be included. So we need to know the activities of the end members we are considering.

Because the activity of a component or end member in a mineral solution is defined as:
ai = γiXi

what we generally seek to know are values for activity coefficients, γi. The values vary, depending on pressure, temperature and composition of the phase involved (P, T and X). We determine them on the basis of experimental studies and thermodynamic calculations.

Solution Models


The relationships between P,T,X and activity coefficients (or activities) can be quite complicated. Consider Figures 2 and 3 above – the activity-composition curves seem linear in some places and not in others. Deviations from activity are greater for some compositions, and less for others. If we were to look at the same diagrams for different PT conditions we would find even more variability. So, we need a way to calculate activities under a wide range of conditions. We do this using activity models, but we recognize that the models have limitations. They are, in effect, just equations that we have fit to available experimental and thermodynamic data. An overarching goal is to have models that are accurate enough so that any errors in calculated activities are insignificant, but simple enough so we can evaluate them with having to do complex calculations.

Ideal Mixing

The simplest model is ideal mixing. For ideal solutions, γi = 1 in all cases, and mole fraction of mineral end members can be used in thermodynamic calculations: ai = Xi. For such solutions, the Gibbs energy of mixing, Gmix is given by:

Gmix = Gideal = RT(X1lnX1 + X2lnX2 + . . . + XnlnXn)

Gideal refers to the energy of ideal mixing, and the Xi values are the mole fractions of the components in solution.

If only life were always this simple all the time! In reality, ideal mixing can sometimes be assumed if concentration of a component is close to 1. It may or may not work for the Henry's law region, depending on the Henry's law constant.

Symmetric Solution Model

Excess Energy of a Symmetrical Margules Solution Figure 4. The excess energy of mixing, calculated for a symmetrical solution model, with WG=2000 cal (8.368 Kj). The top of the curve is at 250 cal (1.046 Kj).
For non-ideal solutions, the Gibbs energy of mixing is
Gmix = Gideal + Gexcess = Gid + Gxs
where the two terms on the right hand side refer to the ideal and excess contributions to the energy of mixing. The ideal contribution is calculated using the equation above. The excess contribution is calculated using an activity model. Free energies are measured in units of calories (cal) or joules (j); one calorie = 4.184 j and 1000 cals = 4.184 Kj.

One relatively simple activity model is to assume that the excess energy of mixing is symmetrical. For a binary solution, this means that the excess energy peaks for a 50:50 solution and decreases symmetrically toward each end member (Figure 4). This can be described mathematically:
Gxs = WGX1(1-X1)
where X1 is the mole fraction of one of the end members.

Activities for a symmetrical solution Figure 5. Activities of end members in a two component symmetrical solution with WG = 2000 cal (8.368 Kj).
The term WG is called the interchange energy, the Margules interaction parameter, or just the Margules parameter. In detail, each atom in a crystalline structure interacts energetically with surrounding atoms of different elements; Margules parameters "correct" for the excess energy related to these interactions. Margules parameters are determined through careful experimental studies and/or analysis of well-constrained mineral parageneses. Keeping things very simple, WG is sometimes assumed to be constant over a range of physical conditions. Slightly more complicated is to acknowledge that it varies with temperature or even with pressure:
WG = WG + PWV -TWS
where the WV and WS terms are symmetrical terms describing the excess volume and entropy of mixing.

For a binary symmetrical solution containing components A and B, the activity coefficients (γ's) of components A and B are calculated from the equations:
RT ln γA = WG(1-XA)2
RT ln γB = WG(1-XB)2

Once we have the activity coefficients, we can calculate the activities (Figure 5) using the relationship ai = γiXi.

XSEnergyAsymetrical Figure 6. The excess energy of mixing, calculated for an asymmetrical solution model, with WG1=1000 cal (4.184 Kj) and WG2 = 4000 cal (16.736 Kj). The top of the curve is at about 700 cal (2.929 Kj).
Note that if WG = 0, Gxs = 0, the γ values are 1, and we are back to ideal mixing.

Asymmetric Solution Model

The asymmetric solution model assumes that the excess energy of mixing of a binary solution containing components A and B can be described by:
Gxs = XAXB(WG1XB + WG2XA)

In this model, we have two Margules parameters (W values) instead of one as we did with the symmetric model. A curve describing the excess energy has a distorted parabolic shape, peaking at some composition other than X=0.5 unless WG1 = WG2 (Figure 6). For this model, the activity coefficients are calculated as:
RT ln γA = (XB)2(WG1+2XA(WG2-WG1))
RT ln γB = (XA)2(WG2+2XB(WG1-WG2))

Figure 7 shows calculated activities for a binary solutions with the two Margules parameters equal to 1000 cal (4.184 Kj). and 4000 cal (16.736 Kj).

As with the symmetrical model, the W values may be assumed constant, or may vary with P and T.
Asymmetrical Activity Model Figure 7. Activity-composition relationships calculated for as asymmetrical solution model, with WG1=1000 cal (4.184 Kj). and WG2 = 4000 cal (16.736 Kj).

More Complicated Models

The symmetric and asymmetric models described above are not sufficient to describe the mixing of plagioclase (Figure 2). They might be good approximations for orthpyroxene, depending on the accuracy we require. For these and many other mineral solutions, it is often necessary to use more complicated activity-composition models. There are many to choose from, and some require complex computer programing. For more information, see the discussion in Frank Spear's Metamorphic Phase Equilibria and Pressure-Temperature-Time Paths (Mineralogical Society of America Monograph 1993).

How Do We Use Activity Models?


Because many reactions that affect real rocks involve minerals with solid solutions, activities and activity models are needed to make meaningful thermodynamic calculations. Activity models are essential for application of advanced thermodynamic modeling programs, and more basic geothermometers or geobarometers. For example, the reaction between anorthite, grossular, kyanite and quartz is often used to calculate the pressure at which a rock equilibrated:
3 anorthite = grossular + 2 kyanite + quartz

If a rock contains pure anorthite, grossular, kyanite and quartz, then the reaction takes place where shown in Figure 1 (above). However, most for most rocks that contain plagioclase, garnet, kyanite and quartz, the plagioclase only contains a small amount of anorthite, and the garnet only contains a small amount of grossular. Consequently, the reaction does not take place at the conditions shown in Figure 1 but, usually instead, at lower pressures.

To calculate the pressure at which this reaction takes place requires knowing the activities of the phases involved. Once the activities have been determined, the equilibrium constant (K) may be calculated. K is the product of the activities of the reaction products, divided by the product of the activities of the reactants (and with each activity raised to the power of its stoichiometric coefficient in the reaction): Equation 03: the equilibrium constant


For the reaction involving anorthite, grossular, kyanite, and quartz (the GASP barometer), the equilibrium can be expressed with the equilibrium constant as:

Equation 05
In the above equation, the last ratio (after "ln") is the equilibrium constant. It involves only the activities of grossular and anorthite because kyanite and quartz are pure (and so have activities = 1).

Figure 8. Equilibria for the GASP barometer showing contours for lnK.
Figure 8 shows how the equilibrium for the GASP barometer varies according to the equilibrium constant (the contoured lines showing the range of values for K). The activity constant is used to calculate the PT location of the reactions. This diagram shows the relationship between the composition of minerals in a natural assemblage, how these compositions are represented as activities and are related by the equilibrium constant (K), and their relationship to the physical conditions (pressure and temperature).

As a simple example, consider a rock that contains plagioclase with a composition of An20 (XAnPl = 0.2) in equilibrium with a garnet with 8% grossular component (XCagar =0.08) (and quartz and kyanite must also be present in the rock, but they are pure phases so their activities will be one). If we assume ideal mixing (all activity coefficients = 1), K = [.08]/[.2]3 = 10. If we have an independent temperature estimate from geothermometry we can read the estimated pressure directly off the graph (e.g. at 500oC, the estimated pressure would be 0.8 GPa).

For more details of how activity models are used to calculate mineral equilibria, see the thermodynamics calculation page and applications to geothermobarometry. These principles are used in the advanced modeling programs such as ThermoCalc, Melts, PERPLEX and TWQ, although the activity models used in these programs can be quite complex and require top-end computational capabilities.

Related Resources



« Previous Page      Next Page »