Geologic History of the Beartooth Mountains
David. W. Mogk, Professor Emeritus, Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University
(Download the PDF (Acrobat (PDF) 26.2MB Dec31 24) to your mobile device or print this file if you want to have access to information on this webpage while you are in the field where there is no cell or wi-fi access. The geologic features and events described in this webpage provide a more complete description of the geology of each area identified in the Field Guide to the Beartooth Mountains.
Overview
The geologic history of the Beartooth Mountains is preserved in rocks, landforms, and fossils that span 4.0 billion years (Ga) of Earth history. This section provides a timeline of the major geologic events that have occurred in the geologic history of the Beartooth Mountains. Information is presented on when major geologic events happened. Explanations are also provided that describe what evidence is used, and how to interpret geologic relations and data. It's time to start thinking as a geoscientist!
To start, a geologic index map provides a guide to the key geologic features explored in this field guide. J. Tuzo Wilson (1936) subdivided the Beartooth Mountains into 4 distinct structural blocks: the Beartooth Plateau, North Snowy Block, South Snowy Block, and Stillwater Block (described in more detail below). Each of these structural blocks are colored on the figure below and represent different types of Archean (older than 2.5 billion year) rocks. Range bounding faults are delineated showing Laramide-style high angle, basement-cored, reverse faults with sawtooth symbols, and active normal faults with hachure symbols in Paradise Valley. The stippled pattern indicates the extensive Eocene (~50 million-year-old) Absaroka Volcanic Sequence. Geologic features of note described in this field guide, starting at the top of the map and progressing clockwise, include: Suce Creek Fault (SCF). Stillwater Complex (SC), Stillwater Contact Aureole (SCA) Stillwater Mine (SM), Beartooth Front (BF), Rock Creek (RC), Eastern Beartooth high-grade metamorphic rocks (EBT), Long Lake Magmatic Complex (LL), Great Unconformity (GU), Beartooth Butte (BB), Heart Mountain Detachment Fault (HMD), New World Mining District (NW), Gardiner-Spanish Peaks Fault (GSPF), Jardine Metasedimentary Sequence (JMS), Jardine Mine (JM), Hepburn Mesa (HM), Deep Creek-Luckock Park Fault (DC-LPF), Paradise Valley Quaternary deposits, and Pine Creek Nappe (PCN).
Index Map of Geologic Features in Beartooth Country
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
The International Union of Geological Sciences International Chronostratigraphic Chart (Acrobat (PDF) 321kB Nov4 24) is provided for reference to the Eons, Eras, and Periods defined for geologic time. The concept of "deep time" is one of the most profound and fundamental contributions of geologic thought to human understanding of our place in the universe. Throughout this report, geologic ages are reported as: billions of years (gigaannum, Ga), millions of years (megaannum, Ma), and thousands of years (kiloannum, Ka). We'll start our exploration of Beartooth geologic history in the Eoarchean (4.0-3.6 billion years [Ga] ago) and follow the geologic timeline through the Holocene and the epic floods that occurred in the region in 2022.
Archean Artist Concept drawing; from Smithsonian Museum of natural History
Provenance: Smithsonian Museum of Natural History, https://ocean.si.edu/through-time/ancient-seas/archean-eon-4600-2500-million-years-ago
Reuse: This item is in the public domain and maybe reused freely without restriction.
In the Beginning, There Were Zircons--Eoarchean Geology, The Geologic Record From 4.0-3.6 Ga
The Beartooth Mountains have preserved some of the oldest Earth materials in the world, dating back to 4.0 Ga. It is extremely difficult to see through the veils of such great expanses of geologic time as the Earth is a dynamic planet that is constantly recycling materials in tectonic processes, (mountain-building), surficial processes (water, wind, glaciers...), and a probable global meteorite impact event (the Late Heavy Bombardment event, 4.1-3.8 Ga ago) that also pulverized the Moon to create the Lunar Highlands cratered topography. No rocks have been preserved in the Beartooth Mountains in the age range 4.0-3.6 Ga, although the world's oldest silicic igneous rock unit is the Acasta Gneiss of the Slave Province of the Canadian Shield, which has been dated at 4.03 Ga. However, rocks of the Beartooth Mountains contain populations of the mineral zircon that did form in episodes of crust formation during this time interval.
How Do We Know: Determination of Geologic Ages With Geochronology
Zircons tell the story of early Earth. Zircon minerals (ZrSiO4) are Nature's time capsules as they are virtually indestructible and are resistant to melting at high temperatures and to chemical weathering at surficial conditions. Dr. John Valley, University of Wisconsin, writes that "Zircons are Forever" (Also, see the PBS Wisconsin YouTube video, 1 hour, on Dr. Valley presenting Zircons are Forever). Zircons are used preferentially in geochronologic studies to determine the ages of very ancient rocks. This is because during crystallization of zircon small amounts of radioactive uranium can be taken into the crystal structure of the zircon. Once in the crystal structure, the radioisotopes of Uranium, 235U and 238U, ultimately break down to their stable "daughter isotopes", 206Pb and 207Pb respectively. Zircons make particularly good time capsule geochronometers because they are resistant to alteration and behave as "closed systems", meaning that the original radioactive parent atoms and the daughter atoms produced by radioactive breakdown over time are isolated and can't escape.
Theory: The radioactive isotopes of uranium break down exponentially over time. This is represented as the "half life" of the isotope, which is ~4.5Ga for
238U and 700 Ma for
235U. (The decay constant,
λ, is the reciprocal of the half life). Half life is defined as the amount of time required to reduce that amount of a substance in half. So, if you start with 100 atoms, after 1 half life you will have 50 atoms, after 2 half lives you'll have 25 atoms, and so on. By measuring the isotopic abundances of U (the radioactive parent) and Pb (the radiogenic daughter) it then becomes possible to calculate the age of formation of the zircon by applying the decay equation: a simplified version is
D = P(eλt - 1), where
D is the measured isotopes of daughter elements,
P is the measured isotopes of the radioactive parent element,
λ is the decay constant for the radioactive isotope (inverse of the half-life of that isotope), and
t is the age of crystallization. This equation can then be solved for
t: For the
238U-
206Pb series,
t206 = 1/λ238(206Pb/238U +1).
Sampling and Sample Preparation: Numerous steps are required to obtain the age of a rock: 1) Sampling in the field of well-characterized rocks is the start. Samples selected for age dating must be from well-known rock units with clear field relations. 2) "Clean" samples are selected with a minimum of alteration, chemical weathering, or other structural modifications. Zircons are present in most crustal rocks in only trace abundances, so numerous pounds/kilos of rock may have to be collected to get sufficient yield for geochronologic analysis. 3) Samples are then processed in the laboratory to obtain separates of the mineral zircon. This entails pulverizing rocks in a rock jaw crusher and disk mill, and then sieving the rock fragments to less than sand-sized grains. Zircons are quite dense, so a series of either hydraulic methods (like panning for gold) or use of "heavy liquids" in glass columns are used to gravitational settling to separate the zircons from less dense minerals. This is a difficult and time-consuming process as zircons in most rocks only occur in trace abundances, and they occur as very small crystals that are only 10s to 100s microns in size.
Sample Characterization Using SEM Imaging: Once the zircons are separated from other minerals, they can be further processed using size, shape, color, and magnetic properties. Typically, the zircon mineral separates are then mounted in an epoxy puck and polished for imaging in a
Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) using
back-scattered electron (BSE) imaging and
cathodoluminescence (CL) imaging. This is done because zircons can show complex compositional zoning patterns that reveal different stages of their growth during Earth history, and these compositional maps are used to determine where data should be acquired for isotopic analysis. Different textures reveal different processes that are recorded in the history of the zircons:
- Primary Zircons crystallize directly from magmas and U-Pb dating defines the age of crystallization.
- Inherited zircons occur in igneous rocks and are preserved remnants of zircons that are either remnants of the source rock that melted or may be scavenged from the wall rock surrounding the magmatic rocks. Inherited zircons provide information on the age and composition of source rocks that have melted to produce magmas.
- Zircon overgrowths may occur on primary or inherited zircons in response to younger magmatic or metamorphic events.
- The elemental thorium-uranium ratio, Th/U, measured in zircons can indicate if overgrowths are due to overprinting igneous or metamorphic events. There is a trend to lower zircon Th/U with increasing melt temperature (igneous) and lower zircon Th/U at cooler temperatures (metamorphic).
- Detrital zircons are found in sediments or sedimentary rocks. They form in response to weathering of older rocks that erode, are transported and deposited typically in river or beach sediments. Populations of detrital zircons can provide information on the provenance (i.e., the age and composition) of the sediments. Detrital zircons usually have a rounded texture as a result of transport and abrasion in sedimentary processes.
These relationships can be seen in the accompanying figure of CL images of zircons that show rounded inherited or detrital zircon cores and complex concentric compositional zoning in zircon overgrowths that show successive stages of growth of the zircons.
Data Collection: Isotopic data is measured on mass spectrometers. In practice, numerous quality control steps are needed to obtain isotopic analyses, including calibration and standardization of the instruments, and other corrections for possible mass interferences. Different types of instruments provide different but related types of information:
- Thermal Ionization Mass Spectrometer (TIMS) is used to obtain high precision isotopic data and ages. This is usually done on zircons with simple compositional and textural relations to precisely date a geologic event. For example, dating of zircons from a volcanic ash layer can help put limits on the age of an adjacent fossil bed.
- Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometer (SIMS) (aka Ion Probes) uses a primary particle beam of either positive (e.g., Cs) or negative (e.g., O) ions focused on a sample surface to generate ions that are then transferred into a mass spectrometer across a high electrostatic potential, and are referred to as secondary ions. The advantage of SIMS is that the primary beam can be focused on the compositional zones in zircons imaged by CL, and thus, multiple ages can be obtained from the cores and overgrowths on the zircons--a geologic tape recorder! However, this method is not as precise as TIMS data. An example of a SIMS instrument is the Super High Resolution Ion Microprobe (SHRIMP) at the Stanford-USGS laboratory.
- Laser Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometer (LA-ICPMS) is similar to SIMS but uses a laser spot to etch an analytical pit that is about 10 microns across to ablate the isotopes that are analyzed in the mass spec. This allows numerous independent spots to be analyzed in different zones of the zircon crystal to obtain a series of ages that document discrete geologic events. See the circular laser etch pits in the image of the zircon grain mount.
Data Representation and Interpretation: U-Pb isotopic data are routinely plotted on a "Concordia" diagram to determine the age of a zircon (spot). The
206Pb/
238U ratio is plotted on the Y-axis and the
207Pb/
235U ratio is plotted on the X-axis. The Concordia curve represents the values expected if the two U decay series progress through geologic time undisturbed. The upper intercept on the Concordia Curve,
To, represents the primary crystallization age of the zircon. However, geologic events may disturb the U-Pb system and there may be episodic lead loss from the zircon which would then record a younger age of melting, metamorphism, etc. at
T1. There is always error and uncertainty at some level in these isotopic analyses, and the measured isotopic values are typically plotted as an ellipse of uncertainty. In general, data that are plotted directly on the Concordia curve are said to be "concordant" and in practice, the plotted data are filtered to report results that are within 10% concordance.
Other Information Stored in Zircon Crystals: In addition to U-Pb age dates, zircons host a wealth of additional information:
- Zircons also take up trace amounts of the Rare Earth Element (REE) lutetium (Lu), and 176Lu undergoes radioactive decay to hafnium 176Hf by beta emission nuclear processes. A measure of the relative enrichment or depletion of 176Hf is reported at the εHf value. This is used as an "isotopic tracer" to provide information about the ultimate source of the zircons--indicating primary extraction of melts from the mantle (positive values) or recycling of older crustal crystalline or recycled metasedimentary rocks (increasingly negative values).
- U-Th-He isotopes can also be measured in zircons, as Th (thorium) and He (helium) are also part of the Uranium decay series. These data are used in "thermochronology" studies, as the radiogenic daughter isotopes are trapped in different minerals such as zircon, titanite and apatite at different "closure temperatures". This allows the cooling history of a rock to be determined by creating a Temperature-Time curve, and this can also then be correlated with uplift rates.
- Related to U-Th-He age dating is the method known as fission track dating. 238U decays by nuclear fission, and the energy of the emitted particles leaves a "fission track" in the host crystal structure that can be etched and observed using an optical microscope. Basically, the more tracks, the older the mineral. Minerals such as zircon, apatite, and titanite are used to obtain fission track ages. Fission tracks are annealed in response to heating, and each of these minerals has a different "closure temperature". So, similar to U-Th-He dating, fission track analysis can provide a cooling sequence that can be interpreted as uplift ages during mountain building.
- The stable isotopes of Oxygen in zircons can also be used to interpret environmental conditions of Early Earth. Studies of ancient zircons from the Hadean Eon (4.4-4.0 Ga; John W. Valley, William H. Peck, Elizabeth M. King, Simon A. Wilde; A cool early Earth. Geology 2002;; 30 (4): 351-354; 2) and from Paleoarchean zircons (4.0-3.6 Ga; Peck, Valley, Wilde, & Graham, 2001, "Oxygen isotope ratios and rare earth elements in 3.3 to 4.4 Ga zircons: Ion microprobe evidence for high 18O continental crust and oceans in the Early Archean", Geochimica Et Cosmochimica Acta, 65(22), 4215-4229) to conclude that the surface of the Earth was not a hellish cauldron of hot lava, but rather was relatively cool with free water at the surface since these ancient times.
- Geothermometry using zircons: In addition, zircons can sorb a small amount of titanium (Ti) in their crystal structure, and the amount of Ti has been experimentally calibrated as a function of temperature. So, using another instrument called an Electron Probe Micro Analyzer (EPMA), the concentration of Ti in zircon can be measured and the temperature of crystallization of the zircon can then be determined.
So many pieces of evidence about geologic time, processes and environments from this one simple mineral, zircon!
Other Resources on Geochronology:
The Oldest Zircons of the Eastern Beartooth Mountains
Numerous quartzite (metamorphosed sandstone) rock units are exposed in the Hellroaring Plateau, Quad Creek, and Line Creek areas of the eastern Beartooth Mountains. Detrital zircons analyzed from these quartzites reveal some key indicators of the genesis and evolution of this ancient continental crust in the time interval 4.0-3.6 Ga:
- The oldest zircons in this area date back to ~4.0 Ga.
- There are a number of small but significant continental crust-forming events that occurred at ~3.9, 3.7 and 3.6-3.65 Ga.
- Lu-Hf isotopic systematics of the oldest zircons provided the evidence for Mueller and Wooden (2012) and Mueller et al., (2014) to develop a model of the earliest crustal formation that involved a) early separation of mafic (basaltic) magmas from the mantle to form a stack of crustal layers akin to modern day oceanic plateaus. Partial melting of some of these basaltic layers, fluxed by the presence of water, generated more felsic (siliceous) magmas that are host to the ancient zircon crystals. These are some of the zircons that were weathered, deposited and made available for recovery by sampling the younger quartzites. The εHf values of the zircons indicate that this material came from recycling of existing rocks (the basalts) with little additional juvenile material from the mantle. The tectonic environment has been interpreted as a "plume-dominated" magmatic system (Mueller et al., 2014) over a hot spot, similar to modern day Iceland or Hawaii.
- Zircons collected from quartzites in the Quad Creek area, Beartooth Mountains, were also used in a compilation study of Archean zircons from around the world by Valley et al., 2005, (4.4 billion years of crustal maturation: oxygen isotope ratios of magmatic zircon. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 150, pp.561-580) to report: "The mildly evolved, higher Archean values (6.5-7.5 o/oo) are interpreted to result from exchange of protoliths with surface waters at low temperature followed by melting or contamination to create mildly elevated magmas that host the zircons". The crust at the surface was relatively cool, and free water was at the surface possibly in ocean basins at this early stage of Earth history!
U-Pb Concordia Plot for Eastern Beartooth 3.5 Ga Gray Gneiss
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
The Oldest Rocks in the Beartooth Mountains, Paleoarchean Rocks 3.6-3.0 Ga
The oldest silicic continental rocks in the Beartooth Mountains occur in the Quad Creek, Hellroaring Plateau, Wyoming Creek, Line Creek Plateau, and Christmas Lake areas. These are mostly "gray gneisses" of tonalitic composition--a plutonic rock that has high Si content (SiO2>65 wt %) and high aluminum and sodium content. These ancient gneisses are tectonically intercalated (faulted along shear zones) with metasedimentary and meta-igneous rocks, and occur as inclusions or pendants up to km-scale engulfed by voluminous younger 2.8 Ga magmatic rock. The figure on the right is a U-Pb Concordia plot of zircon analyses from a "gray gneiss" in the Quad Creek area that has a magmatic age of 3.49 Ga, and partially reset age of ~2.8 Ga that corresponds with the age of the surrounding granitic rocks. Key points about these ancient gneisses in the Beartooth Mountains:
- Crust-forming events of this oldest felsic (high silica) continental crust occurred episodically over a time span from 3.6-3.2 Ga, a time span of 400 million years! The oldest rocks that are currently preserved in the Beartooth Mountains started to form at ~3.6 Ga.
- Small increments of felsic magmas were added sequentially to thicken the continental crust in this time interval to form what is recognized as the thick, tectonically stable "Wyoming Craton". (see also: Frost et al 2023 Creating Continents Continents_GSATG541A.pdf (Acrobat (PDF) 1.8MB Nov7 24) 'Frost et al., 2023, Creating Continents: Archean Cratons Tell the Story'] and Frost and Mueller, 2024, Archean Cratons: Time Capsules of Early Earth (Acrobat (PDF) 3.6MB Nov7 24).
- A major crust-forming event occurred from 3.3-3.2 Ga. This is recognized through the large number of gneisses that have been dated in this age range, and in the detrital zircon record from quartzites in the area that have received zircons from rocks of this age.
- The tonalitic magmas formed by melting older mafic (rocks of basaltic composition) at high pressure and temperature and under hydrous conditions (i.e. water is present in the system). Experimental studies of melting basalt have confirmed that the first melt that is produced is of tonalitic composition.
- Trace element compositional variation diagrams indicate that the composition of these ancient tonalites is similar to those produced in a modern-day volcanic continental arc setting (like the Cascades of NW USA or the Andes of South America).
- Lu-Hf isotopic data indicate that the magmas produced in this time interval have increasingly positive εHf values, which indicates the addition of more juvenile material from the mantle. This is typically done through subduction-related processes.
- All of this evidence has led Mueller et al., (2012) to hypothesize a "plume to plate" transition. The significance of these observations is that this appears to be the first operation of what is understood as modern-day plate tectonics, at least in the Beartooth Mountains and Wyoming Craton!
How Do We Know: Using Geochemistry to Determine Magmatic Sources and Processes
The distribution of major and trace elements can be used to interpret magmatic sources and processes. This is because different types of elements have different geochemical properties based on characteristics such as their ionic radius and chemical state (electrical charge on the ions or valence state). Some groups of elements that are useful are: a) Large Ion Lithophile (LIL) elements--these are from columns I and II on the periodic table and have a large ionic radius and small electrical charge (+1 or +2). These are also known as incompatible elements because their large ionic radius makes it difficult to enter crystal structures and their small electric charge means they do not enter strong chemical bonds in crystal structures. Consequently, they tend to be the first elements to melt and be removed from their source area and the last to crystallize from a melt. b) High Field Strength Elements (HFSE) have a much smaller ionic radius and a much larger electric charge (+3 or +4). These elements are often refractory, resist going into a melt, and thus tend to be enriched in the residuum after melting a source rock. c) Transition Metals all have "D" orbitals (Fe, Mn, Cr, Ni...) and Rare Earth Elements (REE; also known as the Lanthanide Elements) all have "F" orbitals and are known for the "Lanthanide Contraction" of ionic radius from the "Light Rare Earths" (La, Ce) to the "Heavy Rare Earths" (Yb, Lu). These properties control elemental partitioning between magmas and crystals. The relative enrichment or depletion of certain elements provides the evidence that allows the interpretation of source rock or igneous process.
Sample Collection, Preparation and Whole-Rock Analysis: Numerous representative samples are collected from a rock type or unit of interest to get a statistical representation of the composition. The size of the sample is determined by criteria such as homogeneity of the texture, presence or absence of large crystals (phenocrysts) that may skew the composition due to the "nugget effect" (misleading results due to over-representation of certain elements in these crystals). Attempts are made to avoid collecting alteration products such as later-stage veins that do not reflect the primary composition, and external weathering rinds are removed. Samples are then powdered in a mechanical ball mill or shatterbox, and these samples are then sent for whole-rock geochemical analysis using methods such as X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) or Inductively-Coupled Plasma (ICP) Optical Emission Spectrometry (OES) or Mass Spectrometry (MS) methods. Unknown powders are calibrated against well-characterized standards, and the results are presented as Wt% Oxide for major elements or PPM for trace elements.
Data Representation and Interpretation: Geochemical data are conveniently presented on a variety of elemental variation diagrams. These data are often used for classification of rock type, to demonstrate ranges of composition of a given rock unit, to identify any anomalies that indicate diagnostic enrichment or depletion of certain elements and to correlate and compare the compositions of similar units from other occurrences and locations. For more detailed information on using geochemical data, see: Rollinson, H.R., Rollinson, H. and Pease, V., 2021. Using geochemical data: to understand geological processes. Cambridge University Press.
-
MgO-SiO2 Variation Diagram for LLMC, Beartooth Mountains
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
In the simplest case, a magma may reflect the bulk composition of the source area. As an example, the mantle consists of ultramafic rocks, and the lower crust is believed to have a dominantly mafic (basaltic) composition and these tend to be enriched in magnesium (Mg), chromium (Cr), and nickel (Ni). Magmatic rocks that are also enriched in Cr and Ni may be inferred to have originated from an ultramafic or mafic source. This diagram shows high MgO content of rocks of intermediate (andesitic) composition (open square symbols) for rocks of the 2.8 Ga Long Lake Magmatic Complex (further explained in the next section) of the Beartooth Mountains. These relations are interpreted as the result of melting of a down-going oceanic basaltic slab during subduction processes, similar to modern day plate tectonics by Mueller, P.A., Wooden, J.L., Mogk, D.W., Henry, D.J. and Bowes, D.R., 2010. Rapid growth of an Archean continent by arc magmatism. Precambrian Research, 183(1), pp.70-88.
-
EBT REE Patterns for felsic gneisses
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Rare Earth Elements (REE) are used as indicators of rock-forming processes because they are generally considered to be immobile elements that are resistant to metamorphism or weathering--thus we can "see through" younger events to the original composition of old rocks. REE plots are constructed by using measured REE content (in ppm) and normalizing to known standard REE content of primitive material such as chondritic meteorites (Chondritic Uniform Reservoir, CHUR) or the primordial mantle composition. These plots are semi-logarithmic plots with normalized REE values on the Y axis and the inventory of REE elements on the X-axis. The red line at 1 represents the "chondritic" reference, so values greater than one indicate relative enrichment in that element and less than one will represent depleted composition with respect to CHUR. This allows comparison of REE patterns for different rocks from different locations and sources. The figure on the right shows REE patterns for numerous felsic gneisses from the eastern Beartooth Mountains. Key points are:
- The "light Rare Earth Elements" (LREEs) are enriched by a factor of about 10 to almost 1000 times chondritic values. This enrichment in LREEs is common among the general group of granitic rocks and indicates high levels of partitioning of these incompatible elements to a melt in the early stages of melting.
- The REE europium (Eu) has a strong affinity for the feldspar mineral plagioclase. A "negative Eu anomaly" indicates that plagioclase remains as a residual mineral after melting of a source rock. This is significant because plagioclase does not occur in the mantle, so the parental magmas of these igneous rocks must have been crustal melts.
- Conversely, a positive Eu anomaly indicates that plagioclase must have been concentrated in a magma. This can occur by plagioclase crystals floating in a magma as they have relatively low density. The ancient gray gneisses of the Beartooth Mountains are mostly tonalitic in composition, which means they are basically plagioclase-quartz rocks. So, these may be viewed as plagioclase cumulate rocks.
- The "heavy Rare Earth Elements" (HREEs) are strongly partitioned into the mineral garnet, and the middle REES have affinities for the amphibole hornblende. In the REE plot on the right, the relative depletion of HREEs Yb and Lu relative to the LREEs indicates that garnet and/or hornblende must have been in the source area. These are typically metamorphic minerals and are stable at high pressures. So, the magmas that formed the gray gneisses must have come from great depths that are estimated to be 30-50 km. This is consistent with magma production in a subduction zone, similar to modern-day plate tectonics.
-
HFSE "SPider"Diagram for rock of the Beartooth Mountains
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Similarly, the "high field strength elements" (HFSE) have been used to infer tectonic environments. The measured concentrations of trace elements are also normalized to mantle values and plotted to show relative enrichment or depletion. In this diagram of magmatic rocks of the Long Lake Magmatic Complex in the Beartooth Mountains, there is prominent depletion of the HFSE elements Nb, P, Zr, and Ti, indicated by the red arrows. HFSE depletion has been used as an indicator of magma formation in a subduction zone in modern tectonic environments.
-
Nb-Y Tectonic Discrimination Diagram for rocks from the Beartooth Mountains
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Other elemental diagrams may be used to determine the tectonic environment of formation of igneous rocks. Using very large, global geochemical datasets for rocks from known tectonic settings, Pearce and others have proposed numerous tectonic discrimination diagrams.
How Do we Know: The Granite Controversy--A Great Debate in Geologic Thought
The "granite controversy" played out in the eastern Beartooth Mountains. During the 1950's and '60's, Arie Poldervaart of Columbia University and his students proposed that the vast expanses of granitic gneiss in the Beartooth Mountains were the result of solid-state transformation of metasedimentary rocks, via infiltrating fluids that introduced or removed soluble elements, in a process known as "granitization" (e.g., Eckelmann and Poldervaart 1957). The inliers of metasupracrustal rocks were interpreted as the chemical resistors that were locally preserved during metasomatic transformation to granites. In contrast, modern geochemical and isotopic studies have demonstrated that these rocks form through magmatic processes (Mueller et al. 2010) and the metasupracrustal rocks are preserved in pendants or screens (meter to km-scale) as older inclusions that have resisted melting and assimilation in younger magmatic intrusions of the LLMC. It's interesting to note that both schools of thought use detrital zircons to support their case: rounded zircons were used as evidence by the granitizers that granitic gneisses derive from earlier metasedimentary sequences, and more recent magmatists recognize the rounded zircons as inherited from a sedimentary source and are incorporated into magmas as refractory phases or through assimilation.
A related geologic controversy is: The Origin of Migmatites—igneous, metamorphic, or both? Sederholm (1907) coined the term "migmatite" meaning "mixed rocks", as migmatization is most often observed as interlayered light and dark bands (mm to meter scale) in crystalline rocks. He described them as (a) "...rock group occupies in a sense a transitional position between the granites and the crystalline schists . . . and has no sharp boundary with any of them." Over nearly a century, a complicated terminology has arisen to characterize migmatites (e.g. Mehnert 1968): descriptive terms such as leucosome (light bodies) and melanosome (dark bodies); interpretive terms such as paleosome (original material) or neosome (newly generated material); and a variety of textural terms such as vein-type, stromatic (i.e. layered), nebulitic (patchy) and agmatitic (intrusive relations); and there are many more. Many mechanisms have been proposed for migmatite formation as compiled by Dietrich (1974) that typically rely on some manner of transport and differentiation of material: injection of magma, infiltration of fluids (large-scale solid-state transformation via metasomatism), partial anatexis (in situ melting on a local scale), chemical metamorphic differentiation (via solid-state local diffusion of components), physical metamorphic differentiation (mechanical segregation of grains), and isochemical metamorphism (e.g., inheritance of layering from earlier structures). Migmatites in the "old" gneisses of the eastern Beartooth Mountains have been interpreted by Maas (2004) as being produced by in situ anatexis (partial melting and segregation of the new felsic melt (quartz and feldspars) into light layers and concentration of dark minerals (hornblende, biotite) into layers of residual material that resisted melting.
A Period of Tectonic Quiescence: 3.0-2.8 Ga
Very little magmatic or metamorphic activity has been recorded between 3.0 and 2.8 Ga in the Beartooth Mountains. This is significant because there are numerous bands of "metasupracrustal" rocks (i.e., rocks that formed at the surface of the Earth, including sedimentary sequences and extrusive igneous rocks such as basalt flows and volcanic ash deposits) in the Beartooth Mountains. These are rocks that were originally deposited as sedimentary rocks in this time interval and then were subsequently metamorphosed. Key geologic relations include:
- The rock assemblages include quartzites, pelitic schists, and banded iron formation units. All of these rocks must have originally been sedimentary rocks that started off as sandstones, clay-rich shales, and iron formations. The sandstones are nearly pure quartz, which means they were either transported long distances or were at the surface for a long time to have other minerals weathered out. The quartzites were probably deposited as beach sands and the shales were probably deposited as offshore, lower energy marine deposits. Iron formations are chemical precipitates that form in the ocean. Limestones that would have been metamorphosed to marbles are conspicuously absent in the Beartooth Mountains. There are also some rocks of mafic composition that could have been formed as surficial lava flows, volcanic tuffs, or intruded as dikes or sills. The depositional environment would have been something like the "passive" margin of the US Atlantic seaboard or an internal continental basin like the Michigan basin.
- The depositional age is constrained between 3.0 Ga which is the age of the youngest detrital zircons in the quartzites and 2.8 Ga which is the age of the Long Lake Magmatic Complex which intrudes these metasedimentary rocks.
- The "old gray gneisses" must have been uplifted from mid-crustal levels (about 20 -30 km depths) to the surface by this time so they would be exposed to surficial weathering, transport and deposition of the zircons in the basin.
A Second Orogenic (Mountain-Building) Event: Volcanic Arc Magmatism and Metamorphism in the Mesoarchean, 2.8 Ga
View across Hellroaring Plateau to Mt. Rearguard, Beartooth Mountains
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
View of Yosemite Valley.
Provenance: National Park Service, Places to Go Yosemite Valley, https://www.nps.gov/yose/planyourvisit/placestogo.htm
Reuse: This item is in the public domain and maybe reused freely without restriction.
The Beartooth Mountains have all the rock types, compositions and structures of a modern continental magmatic arc that are identical to those of the Late Jurassic 105-85 Ma) Sierra Nevada Batholith that formed in response to the subduction of the Farallon Plate as exposed in Yosemite National Park. The main Beartooth massif is made of voluminous (over 2500 km
2 surface exposures of calc-alkaline magmatic rocks that include rocks of basaltic, andesitic, dacitic and granitic compositions. These magmatic rocks are collectively referred to as the
Long Lake Magmatic Complex (LLMC) Some of the key research findings about these rocks include:
2.8 Ga Magmatism
- The timing of this magmatic event was relatively short, spanning 2.83-2.79 Ga (~40 Ma); this is consistent with the timing of modern orogenic (mountain-building) events. A very large amount of continental crust was produced in a relatively short time (Mueller et al., 2010).
- Trace element patterns, including high field strength element depletion, light REE enrichment, negative Eu anomalies, and depletion of heavy REEs are consistent with formation of these magmas in a subduction setting (Mueller et al., 2010, 2012).
- The first occurrences of rocks of andesitic composition is significant because these are the dominant rock types that occur in continental volcanic arcs such as the Cascades of North America. They are interpreted as being the product of subduction processes.
- Sm-Nd, U-Pb, and Lu-Hf systematics indicate there is a significant component of recycled older crust mixed with primitive melts from the depleted mantle (Wooden and Mueller, 1988); this type of mixing of source rocks is common in subduction zones.
-
These rocks were intruded as numerous sheet-like bodies at mid-crustal levels (Henry et al., 1982). In detail, each rock type cross-cuts, and is cut by, rocks of different composition, essentially at the same time. U-Pb geochronology of zircons shows that the numerous compositional varieties of magmatic rocks of the LLMC overlap in time (i.e., they do not follow a simple liquid line of descent from mafic to felsic) during the limited period of magmatism of 2.83-2.79 Ga
- Mueller et al. (2010, 2014) interpreted the assemblage of magmatic rocks in the eastern Beartooth Mountains as the product of simultaneous melting of disparate mantle and lower crustal rocks to generate the diverse array of rocks observed. In this model, the subducted mafic slab, subducted sediments, overlying mantle wedge, underplated mafic crust, ancient felsic gneisses and metasupracrustal rocks all melt simultaneously in a subduction environment. The magmas that were generated are emplaced in the mid-crust at 20-30 km depth where the magmas cross-cut each other, and may undergo magma mingling and partial assimilation. Additional geochemical and isotopic evidence of magmagenesis in a continental marginal subduction environment has been presented by (Mueller et al., 1988; Mueller et al., 2008; Mueller and Wooden, 1988; Mueller et al., 1983; Wooden and Mueller, 1988).
Conceptual model of melting of numerous source rocks to generate the 2.8 Ga Long Lake Magmatic Complex, Beartooth Mountains
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
High Grade Metamorphism and Deformation
Upper Quad Creek Interlayered Gneiss and Metasupracrustal Rocks.
Provenance: Darrell Henry, Louisiana State University
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Enclaves of high-grade metamorphic rocks are found as meter- to kilometer-scale inclusions (pendants, screens) in the vast After deposition of the supracrustal (sandstones, shales, banded iron formation, mafic igneous) rocks, this sequence of rocks was buried deep in the Earth and metamorphosed at high pressures and temperatures. These newly metamorphosed rocks were also tectonically mixed with fragments of the older "gray gneisses" along high temperature fault zones known as ductile shear zones. The supracrustal rocks and the "gray gneisses" formed under very different geologic environments, physical conditions and geologic times, so they must have been physically mixed at some time after their formation. Metamorphism occurs when rocks recrystallize in response to changing physical conditions, predominantly temperature and pressure. Metamorphism may be "static" where only recrystallization occurs, or may be "dynamic" where recrystallization occurs during deformation to produce strong preferred orientation of minerals into planar structures (alignment of platy minerals into planes to create schists; compositional layering that defines gneisses; alignment of linear minerals). Key research findings about these metasupracrustal rocks include:
- Metasupracrustal rocks of the Eastern Beartooth Mountains were subjected to at least one major cycle of "dynamothermal" metamorphism.
- The metasupracrustal rocks of the Eastern Beartooth Mountains experienced "peak" metamorphism in the amphibolite to granulite facies and achieved temperatures as high as 750-800oC and pressures of 6-8 kilobars. One bar of pressure is equal to about 1 atmosphere of pressure, so this would be pressures of 6000-8000 atmospheres. One kilobar of pressure is equivalent to about 3 kilometers of burial under lithostatic load (i.e., the weight of the overlying rock column).
- So rocks that were originally deposited on the surface of the Earth as sandstones and shales must have then been buried as deep as 18-25 kilometers where they were transformed into quartzites and aluminous schists.
- This type of deep burial typically requires "tectonic thickening" where large segments of crust are thrust over other crust. Deep burial of sediments in a basin cannot possibly get surficial sediments down to the 18-25 km depths where peak metamorphism occurs. The 6-8 kilobar pressures recorded in the metasupracrustal rocks are most readily explained by stacking of thrust faults in a convergent continental margin setting.
- After tectonic thickening, there is significant isostatic (buoyant) disequilibrium--i.e., less dense continental crust is depressed to deep crustal levels and this means that this crust becomes buoyant and must rise to higher levels, kind of like depressing an ice cube in a glass of water and then removing the confining pressure. So, there is a later stage of decompression and cooling of these metasupracrustal rocks. This stage of decompression after tectonic thickening is common in convergent margin orogenic (mountain-building) cycles.
- The physical conditions of metamorphism are convergent with the final crystallization temperatures of the surrounding Long Lake Magmatic Complex, indicating the metamorphism occurred during or just prior to emplacement of the surrounding magmatic rocks.
- This type of crustal thickening and high-grade metamorphism typically occurs in a convergent margin setting, related to subduction processes. This is consistent with the interpretation that magmatism and metamorphism occurred in a convergent margin type tectonic environment.
How Do We Know: How to Determine Physical Conditions and History of Metamorphism
Mineral Identification, Hand Sample, Thin Section and Petrographic Microscope, and Petrographic Analysis. Characterization of metamorphic rocks starts with careful identification of the minerals present and the textures of those rocks. This is done by hand sample identification of minerals in the field or lab and refined by closer inspection by looking at thin sections through a petrographic microscope (thin sections are slices of rock glued onto a glass slide and ground down to a 30 micron thickness which allows light to pass through for use on an optical microscope. Examination of thin sections provides two important lines of evidence: 1) optical mineralogy provides the tools for mineral identification; and 2) petrographic analysis looks at textural features in the rock to define metamorphic reactions, textural features such as overgrowths and inclusions, and deformational fabrics, all of which help define the history and processes that were operative in a given rock. Some examples from the eastern Beartooth Mountains include: a) upper left, sillimanite grains in an aluminous schist indicating high temperature metamorphism in the amphibolite facies; b) upper right, a mafic granulite with equant grains of clinopyroxene (bright colors) and plagioclase feldspar (gray); c) lower left, a highly deformed tonalitic gneiss that has undergone ductile deformation, showing large crystals of plagioclase feldspars (gray) that have resisted deformation, and layers of quartz "ribbons" that are the result of ductile shearing and recyrstallization at high temperature; and d) an example of a mafic granulite with gray orthopyroxene grain overprinted with brown-green hornblende minerals in the amphibolite facies.
Photomicrograph of sillimanite in aluminous schist, indicating upper amphibolite facies metamorphism. Field of view is ~2 mm.
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Photomicrograph of mafic granulite, gray grains are plagioclase feldspar, colored grains are clinopyroxene. Field of view is ~2 mm.
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Photomicrograph of highly deformed mylonitic tonalite gneiss; large gray grains are plagioclase feldspar, and the finer grained gray grains are "ribbons" of deformed quartz that are recrystallized due to dynamic deformation in shear zones.
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Photomicrograph of gray orthopyroxene grain overprinted by brown-green hornblende indicating early granulite facies metamorphism overprinted by a later stage of amphibolite facies metamorphism
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Pressure-Temperature Diagram showing metamorphic facies
Provenance: Image from Open Geology, https://opengeology.org/petrology/13-metamorphism-of-mafic-rocks/
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
The Petrogenetic Grid and Metamorphic Facies. Metamorphic conditions are typically represented on a type of diagram called a "petrogenetic grid" that has pressure plotted on the Y-axis (in units of Kilobars, Kb, or Gigapascals, Ga. This type of diagram show the stability of mineral assemblages over a range of pressures and temperatures, and these stability fields are defined by the lines on the graph that represent reaction boundaries. To a first order, simply identifying mineral assemblages in hand sample or under a microscope (using thin sections) can define if a rock has undergone "low" or "high"-grade metamorphism. This approach dates back to George Barrow (1853-1932), the great British geologist, who recognized a regular sequence of metamorphic zones based on
index minerals from low- to high-grade that follow chlorite-biotite-garnet-staurolite-kyanite-sillimanite for aluminous rocks in the Scottish Highlands. The Finnish geologist, Penti Eskola (1883-1964) formalized these relationships into the concept of "metamorphic facies" based on
stable mineral assemblages rather than individual minerals. Mineral assemblages in rocks of mafic (basaltic) composition were used as a reference because they have a relatively limited range of compositions worldwide and therefore can be used as a natural standard to compare metamorphic rocks from any time or location to others. These facies generally represent different regions on the pressure-temperature diagram. The location of the reaction curves on a P-T diagram is based on very
careful, controlled experiments done in high temperature and pressure furnaces; small samples of one mineral assemblage are packed into a reaction vessel and held at a known P and T for an extended time, and then the reaction products are analyzed to confirm the occurrence of the new metamorphic minerals -at the determined P and T. In addition, the location of the reaction curves can be calculated from tables of thermodynamic data.
Elemental compositional maps for garnets from the Jardine Metasedimentary Sequence; note compositional zoning of Ca and Mn from core to rim.
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Geothermometry and Geobarometry. Mineral compositions can be used to calculate temperatures (geothermometry) and pressures (geobarometry). Although mineral groups have a definite structural formula, they can exhibit a range of compositions due to elemental substitution in a process known as "solid solution". These substitution reactions are commonly controlled by variations in temperature and pressure. As above,
carefully conducted experiments have been used to calibrate the compositional shifts between minerals as a function of temperature and pressure. Some useful geothermometers are "exchange reactions" between common minerals such as Fe-Mg between biotite and garnet, Na-K exchange between plagioclase and alkali feldspars; Fe-Mg exchange between garnet and clinopyroxene. Useful geobarometers involve "net transfer" reactions where one mineral forms by reactions of other minerals such as garnet = plagioclase + aluminosilicate (sillimanite) + quartz. Many solid solution minerals such as garnet and plagioclase may be zoned from core to rim. This means they are effectively mineralogic tape recorders of changing physical conditions during the time of their growth. So, using the mineral calibrations, it is possible to determine an early stage core temperature and pressure, and then a later stage temperature and pressure that is recorded in the mineral rim compositions.
To practically obtain metamorphic pressures and temperatures: A) minerals are mapped on polished thin sections using a technique called back-scattered electron imaging to discriminate different minerals, their overgrowths or intergrowths, interior inclusions and replacements; B) compositions are mapped using elemental X-ray mapping methods using an energy dispersive spectrometer on an electron microprobe analyzer (EMPA) or scanning electron microscope; C) quantitative analyses of the minerals are measured by placing an electron beam on spots of interest and counting the yield of secondary X-rays that are produced in the atom-electron beam interaction, comparing these counts to well-known standards, and using computer-based data reduction methods to obtain the compositions of the minerals (and numerous spot analyses are needed to determine to what extent there is elemental zoning in a mineral); and D) applying the compositional data to the experimentally determined geothermometers or geobarometers.
For example, the garnet-biotite geothermometer of Ferry and Spear (1978) is based on Fe-Mg exchange between garnet and biotite. With the electron microprobe we can measure the Fe/Mg ratio in both garnet and biotite. And then temperature is determined by applying the formula: ln [(Mg/Fegar)/(Mg/Febio)] -2109/T + 0.782 where ln is the natural log, Mg/Fegar is the measured Mg to Fe concentration ratio in garnet, Mg/Febio is the measured Mg to Fe ratio in an adjacent biotite, and T is the temperature in degrees Kelvin (convert to Celsius by adding 273). As garnets are often compositionally zoned, pairing a garnet core composition with a biotite inclusion, and an inner zone garnet with a "matrix" biotite, or a rim garnet composition with a biotite in contact with the rim will yield different temperatures that record different stages of metamorphism--this is used to construct pressure-temperature-time paths.
Figure showing the Pressure-Temperature-Time path for metamorphism in the Eastern
Beartooth Mountains.
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Putting it all together: Pressure-Temperature-Time Paths. The pressure-temperature-time path for the metamorphic rocks of the eastern Beartooth Mountains is shown in the accompanying diagram. This metamorphic history was determined by careful petrographic analysis of the rocks that showed the sequence of mineral assemblages through time, including mineral inclusions in overgrowing minerals, metamorphic reaction textures, and then plotting these mineral assemblages on the petrogenetic grid. Hundreds of mineral analyses were obtained using electron microprobes and applied to quantitative geothermometry and geobarometry.
A "clockwise" P-T path has been interpreted for these rocks. The supracrustal rocks deposited on the surface were buried deeper in the crust by tectonic thickening. This is represented as a steep trajectory on the diagram as the response to pressure changes during stacking of thrust faults is instantaneous, but it takes a bit longer for temperatures to increase as conduction of heat to equilibrate with the geothermal gradient takes a long time. The first stage of metamorphism (M1) is in the upper amphibolite to granulite facies (Henry and Daigle, 2018; Henry et al., 2015; Henry et al., 1982). Typical mineral assemblages are garnet-cordierite-sillimanite-biotite-K-feldspar in pelitic schists; hornblende-plagioclase +/-garnet-clinopyroxene-orthopyroxene in mafic rocks; and magnetite-quartz-garnet-orthopyroxene +/- clinopyroxene in banded iron formations. Peak metamorphic conditions have been calculated at 6-8 Kbar and up to 750-800oC (Henry et al., 1982; Maas, 2004; Mueller et al., 2008; Will, 2013; Henry and Daigle, 2018; Guevara et al., 2017). This suite of rocks then experienced a stage of decompression and cooling as the granulite facies assemblages are overprinted (M2A) with amphibolite facies assemblages (e.g., hornblende overgrowths on pyroxenes, 5-6 kbar and ~600oC). Tectonic mixing of the metasupracrustal rocks and the older "gray gneiss" rocks must have occurred at high-grade metamorphic conditions as the contacts between units are ductile shear zones that had to operate at high temperatures to permit ductile flowing of rocks (rather than brittle rupture on faults) and many of the contacts are occupied by high-grade metamorphic mineral assemblages. A late thermal overprint (M2B) increased the temperature to ~750-800oC and this is attributed to heating due to emplacement of the 2.8 Ga LLMC magmatic bodies. This sequence of rocks must have a) been deposited in a stable-platform type setting <3.0 Ga ago; b) gone through an orogenic cycle that brought the metasupracrustal rocks through the granulite/amphibolite facies (M1-M2) at crustal levels of ~20-25 km; this cycle is interpreted as the result of tectonic thickening based on the "clockwise" pressure-temperature path and subsequent heating through emplacement of surrounding LLMC magmatic rocks; and c) a final metamorphic stage (M3) was in the greenschist facies at about 300-400oC and at lower pressures, and the formation of hydrous minerals such as micas, chlorite and serpentine indicate that this metamorphism involved infiltration of water-rich fluids.
Late Archean Accretion Events, 2.8-2.55 Ga, South and North Snowy Blocks
Accreted Terrane of North America
Provenance: Image from USGS, https://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/dynamic/Pangaea.html
Reuse: This item is in the public domain and maybe reused freely without restriction.
One of the great insights in the plate tectonic revolution was the discovery that large blocks of rocks (continental or oceanic) could be transported hundreds or thousands of miles to be docked or accreted against other continental blocks. These far-traveled blocks of rocks are known as "allochthonous" or "exotic" terranes. Mogk (1988) described two sequences of allochthonous units along the western margin of the Beartooth Mountains in the South and North Snowy Blocks.
In the Beartooth Mountains, rocks of the South and North Snowy Blocks have preserved rock suites that have no common ancestry with the main Beartooth massif. Further, the anomalously low-grade metamorphism of rock in the South Snowy Block indicates a geologic history that is not related to the main Beartooth Block, and the degree of tectonic mixing on a km-scale in the North Snowy Block indicates that these units had experienced a metamorphic history prior to emplacement against the Beartooth Block; thus, they can be considered to be allochthonous (far-travelled, exotic and with no common ancestry) metamorphic terranes.
Jardine Metasedimentary Rocks showing rhythmic sedimentary layering. Location is at the confluence of Bear Creek and the Yellowstone River.
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
South Snowy Block
The South Snowy block contains a distinct metasedimentary sequence (Jardine Metasedimentary Sequence; JMS) that was originally mapped with accompanying petrologic and geochemical data by Casella et al. (1982). The JMS is unique in the Beartooth Mountains due to anomalously low-grade metamorphism compared to the main Beartooth Block. Exposures of the Jardine Metasedimentary Sequence extend from near Gardiner, MT at the confluence of Bear Creek and the Yellowstone River and continue east to the area near Tower Junction in Yellowstone National Park at Garnet Hill and Junction Butte. Excellent exposures can be accessed via trails traversing through the Black Canyon of the Yellowstone River. A summary of the geology of the South Snowy Block was published by Mogk et al., (2012), Origins of a Continent (Acrobat (PDF) 2MB Nov13 24), that was the product of a NSF-sponsored Research Experiences for Undergraduates project. Key geologic relations of the South Snowy Block include:
- The rock types include varieties of phyllites, biotite schists, quartzites, rare metaconglomerates and banded iron formations.
- Primary sedimentary structures, such as compositional layering and graded bedding, low angle cross stratification, rip-up clasts and channel scour deposits, are commonly preserved.
- These relations indicate that sedimentary deposition occurred as turbidites--submarine debris flows that shed off a continental shelf and produce gradational bedding due to settling of increasingly finer sediments from turbidity currents as the energy regime decreases. These are often referred to as "Bouma Sequences". Protoliths of these rocks are interpreted as graywackes and mudstones deposited in a submarine fan setting.
- Metamorphism of this sequence is anomalously low grade compared to most Archean metasedimentary sequences in the Wyoming Province and produced phyllitic schists in the west (near Gardiner, MT) and andalusite-staurolite-garnet biotite schists to the west near Tower Junction in Yellowstone National Park (Osborne et al., 2011). This mineral assemblage and related mineral geothermobarometers restrict peak metamorphic conditions are 3.8 Kbar and 550oC. This discontinuity in metamorphic grade is a key indicator that the JMS is "exotic" or out of place with respect to the rest of the Beartooth Mountains.
Jardine Metasedimentary Sequence, Garnet Schist in Outcrop
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
- The contact between the low-grade rocks of the JMS and the crystalline rocks that are similar to the LLMC in the Slough Creek area of Yellowstone National Park is a major ductile shear zone originally mapped by Casella et al., (1982). Indicators of fault movement direction (kinematic indicators) demonstrate that the high-grade crystalline rocks were thrust over the lower-grade JMS metasediments. Geobaromety of the crystalline rocks records crystallization pressures of ~8 kbar, and the metamorphism of the JMS is <3.8 Kbar; this means that there is an uplift (or "throw") across this shear zone of at least 12 km displacement of the crystalline rocks over the JMS.
Crenulation Fold in the Jardine Metasediimentary Sequence
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
- An early stage of isoclinal folding is attributed to soft sediment deposition in a turbidite setting (Fereday et al., 2011) and two stages of open and crenulation folding have been defined (Jablinski and Holst, 1992), creating a "dome and basin" fold interference pattern (Ramsey, Type 1).
Jardine Metasedimentary Sequence, ages of detrital zircons.
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
- Detrital zircon U-Pb data from a quartzite near Jardine have a maximum frequency at ~3.2 and 3.0 Ga with a subsidiary concentration at 3.5 Ga and a minimum age of 2.9 Ga, a pattern not observed in any of the other quartzites across the Beartooth Mountains and Wyoming Province. And, there are no zircons of age 2.8 Ga, so the Late Archean magmatic rocks of the LLMC can't be a source of these sediments.
Hellroaring Pluton intrudes the Jardine Metasedimentary Sequence.
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
- Two epizonal (emplaced within a few kilometers of the surface), bulbous plutons, the Crevice Stock and Hellroaring Stock, intrude the Jardine metasedimentary rocks (Brookins, 1968; Montgomery and Lytwyn, 1984; Philbrick et al., 2011). Many of these magmatic rocks have peraluminous affinities (i.e., an aluminum-rich source area such as melting a pelitic schist), have an estimated depth of crystallization of 10-12 km (3-4 Kbar), and have primary U-Pb zircon ages of ~2.8 Ga--the same age as the main LLMC Beartooth magmatic event.
- The age of juxtaposition of the JMS against the LLMC is bracketed by the age of the youngest detrital zircon in the JMS which is 2.9 Ga and represents the youngest age of deposition of the sediments and 2.8 Ga, which is the age of the cross-cutting Crevice and Hellroaring Plutons (Mueller et al., 2014a; Philbrick et al., 2011).
- Consequently, The Jardine metasedimentary sequence is interpreted as exotic to the Beartooth Mountains and to blocks of basement rocks in surrounding ranges based on its unique detrital zircon pattern and anomalously low metamorphic grade (Mogk, 1988). The crosscutting Crevice and Hellroaring Plutons share geochemical affinities with the LLMC of the Beartooth Mountains (Mueller et al., 2014). These plutons place a minimum age of ~2.8 Ga for the tectonic emplacement of the Jardine metasediments against the Beartooth Plateau block.
- In addition, the western margin of the South Snowy Block is delineated by the high-grade Snowy Shear Zone which is well-exposed in Yankee Jim Canyon at the south end of Paradise Valley north of Gardiner, MT (see: Erslev, 1992; Webber et al., 2019)
Yankee Jim Canyon Outcrop, gray gneisses and ductile deformation.
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Yankee Jim Canyon outcrop, gray gneiss with boudinaged mafic dike.
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
- Jardine Mine- Mineral Hill MIne. Hargrave et al., (2000) report: "The Jardine and Crevice mining districts are located on the western edge of the Absaroka Range, in the Bear Creek drainage just north of Yellowstone National Park. These adjacent districts are geologically similar and are generally discussed as one (Seager, 1944; Reed, 1950; Johnson and others, 1993). Placer gold was discovered in the area around 1862 and during the next decade lode deposits were found on Mineral Hill and Crevice (Crevasse) Mountain. The gold-arsenic-tungsten lode deposits occur as replacement veins in Precambrian schist and quartzite (Elliot and others, 1983). Most of the mining activity has been near Mineral Hill in the Jardine mining district (also referred to as the Sheepeater or Bear Gulch district). The mines consisted of more than 30 adits, approximately 7 miles of underground workings, and a number of open cuts (Reed, 1950). Mines were active in both districts until around 1942, although most of the production was from the Jardine Mine. Recorded production through 1949 totaled at least 201,000 ounces gold; 12,615,131 pounds arsenic trioxide; 766,122 pounds tungsten; 36,000 ounces silver, and minor amounts of copper and lead (Johnson and others, 1993). In 1979, a new phase of gold exploration began at the Jardine mine and production resumed in 1989. From 1989 through 1996, an additional 273,441 ounces of gold was recovered from the mine (R.B. McCulloch, personal commun., 2000). The mine was considered active until 2000 at which time the operator (TVX Gold, Inc.) halted production with the intention of quitting its position at Jardine." The banded iron formations are host to the gold mineralization of the Jardine Mine (Hallager, 1984; Smith, 1996). Mineralization is concentrated in the structural domes where mineralizing fluids ponded below the impermeable iron formations. Read an interesting historical account of Jardine Gold Mining on the Edge of Yellowstone by Robert Goss (2020) and from Western Mining History Mineral Hill Mine.
North Snowy Block
Reid et al., (1975) produced a geologic map that defined the basic map units in the North Snowy Block, and Mogk et al., (1988) reinterpreted these rock units as a zone of major tectonic dislocation and mixing. Key geologic relations are:
- A diverse collection of rock units are juxtaposed on high-grade shear zones including from east to west: the Mount Cowen Augen Gneiss (with large microcline potassium feldspar crystals), Davis Creek Schist (phyllites in the greenschist facies), a TTG gneiss unit that has been ductilely deformed and metamorphosed in the lower amphibolite facies, the Pine Creek Nappe which is an isoclinally folded (parallel limbs of folds), Alpine-style thrust unit with an amphibolite core and symmetrically distributed George Lake Marble and Jewel Quartzite units, an overlying suite of high-grade gneisses that have been partially melted, and a granitic sill that is a "stitching pluton" between the Davis Creek Schist and TTG gneiss.
- These units each have unique geologic histories with respect to their processes and environments of formation, metamorphic grade and deformational histories. In general, the metamorphic grade increases towards higher structural levels, requiring a tectonic inversion of higher grade rocks over lower grade rocks by faulting. These units are mostly tectonically mixed along high-grade ductile shear zones.
- The age of juxtaposition is anchored by injections of the 2. 55 Ga granitic sill between the Davis Creek Schist and TTG gneiss.
- The most significant of the units in the North Snowy Block is the Pine Creek Nappe. This is a km-scale isoclinal fold structure that has been emplaced as a thrust-nappe. The lower limb is strongly attenuated with respect to the top limb, indicating significant tectonic thinning, and the bounding quartzite has strongly developed grain size reduction (mylonitization) indicating deformation under ductile conditions. The thrust fault contact in the image below (left) between the overlying Pine Creek Nappe and the underlying TTG gneiss is traced along the tree line on the cliff. This structure has all the attributes of modern-day thrust nappes in tectonic settings such as the collision of the African and Eurasian Plates to form the Alps. The importance of this structure is that it is one of the oldest examples in the world of horizontal tectonics due to convergent tectonics.
Pine Creek Nappe, North Snowy Block
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Isoclinal Fold on the Upper Limb of the Pine Creek Nappe, North Snowy Block
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Glarus Thrust, Swiss Alps
Provenance: IUGS, Second Hundred Geosites, https://iugs-geoheritage.org/geoheritage_sites/glarus-thrust/
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Cross Section of Alpine Nappes, Central Alps
Provenance: Image from: Thornton, J.M., Mariethoz, G. and Brunner, P., 2018. A 3D geological model of a structurally complex Alpine region as a basis for interdisciplinary research. Scientific data, 5(1), pp.1-20.
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Stillwater Complex: a 2.712 Ga Layered Mafic-Ultramafic Complex
Sketch Map of the Stillwater Complex.
Provenance: Figure from Boudreau (2022) as modified from Zientek and Parks (2014), USGS publication.
Reuse: This item is in the public domain and maybe reused freely without restriction.
The Stillwater Complex is a Late Archean layered mafic-ultramafic magmatic body that is exposed along the northern front of the Beartooth Mountains for over 60 km with a thickness of up to 5500 meters. Geophysical evidence indicates that the bulk of the complex extends several kms north of the Beartooth Mountains in the subsurface (Finn et al., 2020). Detailed field guides of key locations in the Stillwater Complex have been compiled by Czamanske and Zientek (1985). Very accessible and easy to read overviews of the Stillwater Complex are provided by
McCallum (1988 (Acrobat (PDF) 22.7MB Nov19 24)) and
McCallum (2002) (Acrobat (PDF) 797kB Nov19 24) for the On the Cutting Edge 2003 Teaching Petrology workshop.
Stillwater Complex, Ultramafic Zone with Opx Oikocrysts
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Stillwater Complex showing Inch Scale Layering
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
The Stillwater Complex crystallized over a ∼3 million-year interval from 2712 Ma to 2709 Ma (Wall et al. 2018). Magmatic layering was originally sub-horizontal, and sedimentary structures such as graded and cross-bedding are locally preserved in the igneous rocks (Page 1977). Only the southern edge of the Stillwater Complex is exposed in steep to near vertical layering due to faulting along the Mill Creek Stillwater Fault Zone and related Laramide structures (Page 1979; Geraghty 2013). The complex is divided into lithologic units (Zientek et al. 1985) that include a) a zone of diabase and norite sills and dikes, b) a chilled basal zone, c) an ultramafic zone; d) lower, middle and upper banded zones that include troctolites (olivine-plagioclase), norites (orthopyroxene-plagioclase), gabbronorites (orthopyroxene-clinopyroxene-plagioclase), gabbros (clinopyroxene-plagioclase) and anorthositic gabbros (plagioclase>clinopyroxene); e) anorthosites; and f) an underlying contact metamorphic aureole that includes metapelitic hornfels (cordierite-hypersthene and cordierite-anthophyllite assemblages; Labotka and Kath, 2001), quartzite, and banded iron formation (Page 1977; Page and Zientek1985). The magmatic rocks preserve remarkable igneous structures on the outcrop scale such as cm- to meter-scale rhythmic compositional layering, cross-cutting pegmatitic bodies, cm-scale "oikocrysts" (poikilitic pyroxenes with inclusions of older magmatic phases; "oik" = Greek for egg), and "inch-scale layering" (Boudreau 1995) which formed by an Ostwald ripening process in a fluid rich environment that preferentially melted plagioclase to produce enriched, residual pyroxene-rich layers. On the microscopic scale, spectacular igneous textures are well-preserved and reveal magmatic cumulus and post-cumulus processes (Jackson 1961; McCallum et al. 1980; Raedeke and McCallum 1984; Zientek et al. 1985).
Stillwater Complex, Chrome Mine, Mountain View
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Chromite Seam, Ultramafic Zone, Stillwater Complex
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Layered mafic-ultramafic igneous bodies such as the Bushveld Complex in South Africa, Sudbury Complex in Ontario and many others are known to be hosts to a wide array of mineral deposits for Cu, Ni, Cr, and platinum group elements (PGEs, Pt, Pd, Ir). Mineral exploration in the Stillwater Complex has included magmatic Ni-Cu sulfides, chromite deposits in the ultramafic zone, and Pt-Pd deposits in the banded zone (Page et al. 1985a; Boudreau et al. 2020). Ore-forming processes have been interpreted as direct precipitation of magmatic sulfide crystals to produce ore minerals chalcopyrite (CuFeS2) and pentlandite (FeNi)9S8 or precipitating from infiltrating magmatic fluids. Cu-Ni sulfide mineralization occurs in the sill/dike complex immediately subjacent to the main Stillwater magmatic body (Page 1979; Page et al. 1985b), but was never economically mined. Chromite deposits occur in the ultramafic zone, and these were mined in the Benbow region to support the World War II war effort (Lipin et al. 1985) and in the Mountain View section in the early 1960's (Page et al. 1985c). Platinum group element exploration began in the late 1960's in search of deposits similar to the Merensky Reef in the Bushveld Complex, South Africa. Discovery of the platinum-bearing horizon, now known as the J-M (Johns-Manville) reef occurred in 1973, and mining commenced in 1985 by the Stillwater Mining Company, a joint venture of Johns-Manville, Anaconda and Chevron companies. The mine is now operated by Sibanye-Stillwater Company, with mining operations at portals on the main Stillwater River and the East Boulder River. The Stillwater Complex produces ~10% of the domestic demand for platinum and palladium. The Stillwater Complex has proven reserves of ~20,000,000 oz (Boudreau et al. 2020), and in 2020 produced ~18,000 kg of platinum and palladium with a market value of ~$1.1 billion (U.S. Geological Survey, National Minerals Information Center 2021).
The east side of the Stillwater River canyon, near Nye, Montana. The prominent outcrops in the canyon wall are plagioclase-rich, layered igneous rocks of the Stillwater Complex. The tailing pond of the Stillwater Mine is in the foreground. The Stillwater Mine produces palladium and platinum from the J-M Reef, an igneous layer in the Stillwater Complex.
Provenance: Image from USGS, https://www.usgs.gov/media/images/stillwater-river-canyon-and-stillwater-mine
Reuse: This item is in the public domain and maybe reused freely without restriction.
Proterozoic Geologic Events: 2.5 Ga- 538 Ma
Regional Tectonic Map Showing Relation of Wyoming Craton to other structural elements in the North American Plate
Provenance: Figure Modified from Foster et al (2006).
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Very little tectonic activity was experienced in the Beartooth Mountains during the Proterozoic Era, from ~2500-600 Ma. By the end of the Archean, thick (>30-40 km), stable continental crust was established that led to cratonization of the Wyoming Province. For more information on the formation of the Wyoming Craton see: a)
Mueller, P. A., and Carol D. Frost (2006), The Wyoming Province: a distinctive Archean craton in Laurentian North America, b)
Frost et al., (2023) Creating Cratons: Archean Cratons Tell the Story, c)
Mogk et al., 2023, Crustal genesis and evolution of the Archean Wyoming Province: Continental growth through vertical magmatic and horizontal tectonic processes ,and d) and for general information on creating cratons
Frost and Mueller (2024). Archean cratons: time capsules of the early Earth. Elements,
20(3), pp.162-167. Some key geologic relations involving the Wyoming Craton include:
- The Proterozoic rock record is almost completely missing in the Beartooth Mountains from ~2500 to ~600 Ma. Other than a few mafic dikes (described below), there is no record of new magmatic additions to the crust in this time interval, and there is no record of deposition of Proterozoic sedimentary rocks (the Mesoproterozoic Belt Supergroup is not recognized in this area).
- The Wyoming Craton is surrounded by Paleoproterozoic orogenic belts in the time range of 19-1.6 Ga including: a) the Great Falls Tectonic Zone (GFTZ) on the northwest margin, b) the Cheyenne Belt (CB) on the south and c) the Trans-Hudson Orogen (THO) on the east. Each of these orogenic belts formed as the result of tectonic collisions between continental blocks. The GFTZ formed in response to the collision between the Medicine Hat Block and Hearne Block with the Wyoming Craton; the Cheyenne Belt formed through accretion of volcanic arcs of the 1.9-1.6 G Yavapai-Colorado Terranes; and the THO formed in response to collision between the Superior Craton (Canadian Shield) and the Wyoming Craton. Kevin Burke, a planetary geologist from NASA's Lunar Planetary Institute, famously branded the Wyoming Craton as "Nuclear North America" as it provided the "seed" for growth of the continent through various tectonic events and mechanisms through geologic time.
- The tectonic juxtaposition of all these diverse crustal units is related to a cycle of "supercontinent assembly", and resulted in the formation of the Laurentia Supercontinent ~1.9-1.7 Ga ago. This stage of continental assembly and growth is thoroughly discussed in Geological Society of America Memoir 220, Whitmeyer et al., 2023, Laurentia: Turning Points in the Evolution of a Continent. and chapters in that book by Whitmeyer et al., 2023, The tectonic evolution of Laurentia and the North American continent: New datasets, insights, and models and Harms and Baldwin, 2023, Paleoproterozoic geology of SW Montana: Implications for the paleogeography of the Wyoming craton and for the consolidation of Laurentia. Tectonic events along the GFTZ include development of the Little Belt Magmatic arc at about 1. 86 Ga (Mueller et al., 2002, Paleoproterozoic crust within the Great Falls tectonic zone; implications for the assembly of southern Laurentia and evidence from crustal xenoliths in the GFTZ (Gifford et al., 2014, Precambrian crustal evolution in the Great Falls Tectonic zone: insights from xenoliths from the Montana Alkali Province; Gifford et al., 2018, Extending the realm of Archean crust in the Great Falls tectonic zone: Evidence from the Little Rocky Mountains, Montana. The somewhat younger "Big Sky Orogeny" at ~1.77 Ga has been described by Harms et al., 2004, Advances in the geology of the Tobacco Root Mountains, Montana, and their implications for the history of the northern Wyoming Province, Harms et al., 2022, The Paleoproterozoic of Montana, Harms and Baldwin, 2022, Paleoproterozoic geology of SW Montana: Implications for the paleogeography of the Wyoming craton and for the consolidation of Laurentia and supported by isotopic ages of high grade metamorphism (Mueller et al., 2005, Paleoproterozoic Metamorphism in the Northern Wyoming Province: Implications for the Assembly of Laurentia).
- The Beartooth Mountains are interior to the margins of the Wyoming Craton and largely did not experience the magmatism, high-grade metamorphism, or deformation associated with these Paleoproterozoic events.
- However, conventional K-Ar age dates have been locally reset due to this tectonothermal metamorphism along the western margin of the Beartooth Mountains to ages of about 1800-1600 Ma. But, the main Beartooth Massif has largely escaped resetting by these Paleoproterozoic events, with K-Ar ages remaining intact at about 2500 Ma.
-
Trace of Long Lake Mafic Dike.
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Mafic Dike Emplacement: Numerous stages of emplacement of mafic dikes have been recorded in the Beartooth Mountains. These were first documented by Prinz (1964, 1965). Mueller and Rogers (1973) attempted to characterize the different suites of dikes based on differences in whole rock elemental compositions (primarily decrease in MgO and increase in TiO2 and K2O with time). Mafic rocks are notoriously difficult to date precisely due to the absence of zircons (mafic rocks are Si undersaturated, so the mineral zircon won't crystallize). However, using Rb/Sr and K/Ar methods, they determined the ages of the dikes ranged from 2750 to 740 million years (Ma). Baadsgard and Mueller (1971) also used Rb/Sr and K/Ar methods to identify three stages of dikes: 2550, 1300 and 740 Ma (noting that the K-Ar results were suspect due to chemical resetting). Rowan and Mueller (1971) dated two dikes in the Gardner Lake area and report an age of 2750 Ma for a dike that is metamorphosed in the amphibolite facies but did not experience penetrative deformation and folding, and the younger dike was emplaced between 1800-1600 Ma. The oldest generation of mafic rocks have undergone a static hydrothermal metamorphism in the greenschist to lower amphibolite facies (epidote-amphibolite), but most of the dikes retain their igneous textures (diabasic texture, with well-defined plagioclase laths surrounded by a matrix of anhedral clinopyroxenes).
Leopard Rock Dike, near Beartooth Lake.
Provenance: Image from Steve Harlan, submitted to On the Cutting Edge Teaching Petrology Workshop.
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
A special type of mafic dike, colloquially referred to as the "leopard rock" by Prinz (1964) is a plagioclase cumulate rock with plagioclase crystals growing numerous centimeters in diameter and comprising over 50% of the rock. Harlan (2003, Cutting Edge Teaching Petrology Workshop) reports: "The age of the leopard dikes is not known with certainty, but mineral and whole-rock samples from a leopard rock dike in the northern Bighorn Mountains gave a Rb-Sr isochron of 2200 ± 35 Ma (Stueber et al., 1976)". More recent use of the more precise 40Ar/39Ar dating method by Harlan et al., (1997) report an age of 774 +/-4 Ma for the Christmas Lake dike. MacKinder et al., (2019) correlate the Christmas Lake dike with the "Gunbarrell Large Igneous Province", which is a plume-generated dike system that is expressed from the Yukon to Wyoming. These dikes may be part of a giant radiating dike swarm related to an ancient mantle plume and may record the initial breakup and rifting of the supercontinent Rodinia (Park et al., 1995; Harlan et al., 1997. A Review of the Mafic Dikes of the Beartooth Mountains (Microsoft Word 4.6MB Nov19 24) was prepared by Steve Harlan, USGS, for the 2003 On the Cutting Edge Teaching Petrology Workshop.
- It's interesting to note that there is virtually no contribution of the dominant 2800 Ma LLMC f the Beartooth Mountains to the detrital zircon population in the adjacent LaHood and Neihart Formations of the lower Mesoproterozoic Belt Basin with depositional ages starting at about 1500 Ma (see: Mueller et al., U-Pb ages of zircons from the Lower Belt Supergroup and proximal crystalline basement: Implications for the early evolution of the Belt Basin); i.e., the crystalline rocks of the Beartooth Mountains do not appear to be exposed at the surface of the Earth at ~1500 Ma.
- An overview of the Proterozoic geologic history of Montana can be found in Harms and Baldwin, 2022, Paleoproterozoic of Montana . Mesoproterozoic rocks of the Belt Basin are not present in the immediate vicinity of Beartooth Country.
Paleozoic Sedimentation and The Great Unconformity
Paleozoic Sedimentation
At the start of the Paleozoic Era, shallow seas covered the cratonic rocks of the Wyoming Province. In the Beartooth Mountains, these include a) the basal sedimentary unit, the Cambrian Flathead Sandstone, which is interpreted as a beach sand deposit; b) Devonian shales and limestone channel deposits in an estuarine setting of the Beartooth Butte Formation and according to Dorf (1934): "...lies on the marine Bighorn dolomite of Upper Ordovician age and is, in turn, overlain by the marine Jefferson limestone of the Middle Devonian; and c) the shallow water carbonate platform deposits of the middle Mississippian Madison Limestone formation. Sedimentation in the lower Paleozoic required relatively stable tectonic conditions, and sedimentary rocks were deposited in numerous transgressive-regressive marine successions onto the Wyoming Craton.
The Great Unconformity
The Great Unconformity, Beartooth Mountains
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
The basal Paleozoic rock formation, the Flathead Sandstone, was deposited directly on the 2.8 Ga crystalline rocks of the Long Lake Magmatic Complex in a few isolated locations in the Beartooth Mountains. In the accompanying figure, the granitic gneisses of the 2800 Ma LLMC are in the foreground in the lower right part of the picture, and the layered sedimentary rocks of the 530 Ma Cambrian Flathead Sandstone are in the upper left part of the picture. At this location, ~200 meters east of the Top of the World general store, you can literally step across almost 2300 million years of "lost" Earth history! Beartooth Butte is a second instance of Lower Paleozoic rocks preserved on the Archean basement.
-
Beartooth Butte
Provenance: USFS, Custer National Forest
Reuse: This item is in the public domain and maybe reused freely without restriction.
Beartooth Butte is also of particular significance because it is the site of some of the oldest Devonian fish (29 species) and terrestrial plant fossils (5 species).
A somewhat different occurrence of the Great Unconformity occurs in the Picket Pin section of the Stillwater Complex where Cambrian limestones are in unconformable contact with the Upper Gabbro zone (Carlson et al. 1985).
What is the Significance of Unconformities?
Lyell's 1852 Illustrations of Siccar Point from A Manual of Elementary Geology, by Charles Lyell Frontispiece and Fig.83
Provenance: Geological Society of London, https://www.geolsoc.org.uk/GeositesSiccarPoint
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Hutton’s Unconformity at Siccar Point with a geotourist for scale. The figure is standing on shallowly dipping Devonian rocks that rest unconformably upon steeply dipping Silurian-aged rocks beneath (Photo: Colin MacFadyen/NatureScot).
Provenance: IUGS First 100 Geosites, https://iugs-geoheritage.org/geoheritage_sites/siccar-point/
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Unconformities represent periods of erosion or non-deposition that separate rock units of different ages. Overlying rocks on an unconformity surface are younger than the underlying rocks, and the interval of time that is missing is referred to as a hiatus. The "missing" time of an unconformity may be determined by a) obtaining very precise radiometric ages above and below the unconformity, for example, by dating interlayered volcanic ash beds, or b) comparing fossil assemblages of known ages above and below the unconformity. There are different types of unconformities:
- Disconformity: a period of non-deposition or erosion between layers of parallel sedimentary rocks;
- Nonconformity: the contact between underlying crystalline igneous or metamorphic rocks and overlying sedimentary rocks; the unconformity in the Beartooth Mountains defined by underlying Archean granitic rocks and overlying Cambrian quartzites and between the Vishnu Schist and Grand Canyon Supergroup in the Grand Canyon (see below) are examples of nonconformities.
- Angular unconformity: original sedimentary layers are deposited horizontally, tilted to some angle away from horizontal, eroded, and then an overlying younger sedimentary sequence is deposited, creating an angular discordance between the layers; Siccar Point Scotland, and the Great Unconformity in the Grand Canyon are examples of angular unconformities.
The concept of "deep time" is one of the great contributions of the geosciences to human understanding of their place in the universe. This was first conceptualized by James Hutton who recognized the significance of the unconformity at Siccar Point, Scotland. He recognized that the geologic relations at Siccar Point revealed: a) the original horizontal deposition of Silurian sediments, b) a period of uplift and tilting of the sediments from their original depositional setting, c) a period of (unknown duration) of erosion and non-deposition, i.e., "missing" geologic time; and d) subsequent deposition of a new sequence of Devonian sediments. This relationship is known as an "angular unconformity".
From the Geological Society of London, Lyell Collection: "One of Hutton's companions, John Playfair, wrote of Siccar Point: "On landing at this point, we found that we actually trode on the primeval rock, which forms alternately the base and the summit of the present land. It is here a micaceous schistus, in beds nearly vertical, highly indurated, and stretching from south-east to north-west. The surface of this rock runs with a moderate ascent from the level of low-water, at which we landed, nearly to that of high-water, where the schistus has a thin covering of red horizontal sandstone laid over it; and this sandstone, at the distance of a few yards farther back, rises into a very high perpendicular cliff. Here, therefore, the immediate contact of the two rocks is not only visible, but is curiously dissected and laid open by the action of waves."
"On us who saw these phenomenon for the first time the impression will not easily be forgotten...We felt necessarily carried back to a time when the schistus on which we stood was yet at the bottom of the sea, and when the sandstone before us was only beginning to be deposited, in the shape of sand or mud, from the waters of the supercontinent ocean... The mind seemed to grow giddy by looking so far back into the abyss of time; and whilst we listened with earnestness and admiration to the philosopher who was now unfolding to us the order and series of these wonderful events, we became sensible how much further reason may sometimes go than imagination may venture to follow."
See Professor Iain Stewart's video on The Most Important Geological Site in the World. For further consideration, the recognition of very large timescales of Earth's history provided the conceptual foundation for Darwin's work on natural selection as presented in On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection (1859).
John Wesley Powell also recognized important unconformities in his pioneering explorations of the Grand Canyon, where a) the metamorphic Vishnu Schist is overlain by sedimentary Precambrian rocks of the Grand Canyon Supergroup on the Great Nonconformity, and b) the Grand Canyon Supergroup rocks are overlain by the Paleozoic Tonto Group in an angular unconformity. The term "Great Unconformity" was first used by Walcott (1910) to describe the "stratigraphic and time break between the known pre-Cambrian rocks and Cambrian sediments of the North American continent."
At right is the first stratigraphic section of the Grand Canyon, from John Wesley Powell’s 1875 report, showing what would later be termed the Great Unconformity. Letter A is the metamorphic basement—the oldest rocks. B is the Precambrian Grand Canyon Supergroup, which is composed of tilted sedimentary rocks that lack fossil assemblages. C indicates Paleozoic rocks, which contain fossils marking the explosion of life. Two unconformities can be seen at x and y, with the former marking the Great Unconformity. At left is a recent photograph of Grand Canyon from Walhalla Plateau, with the red line showing the Great Unconformity. Credit: Annie Scott/USGS
Provenance: USGS
Reuse: This item is in the public domain and maybe reused freely without restriction.
Laramide-Style Faulting--Uplift of the Present Beartooth Mountains
Basement map of the Archean Wyoming Province and surrounding areas. The areas in black are where Archean
rocks are presently exposed at the core of Laramide uplifts. 1 = Big Horn Mountains, 2 = Beartooth Uplift, 3 = Wind River
Range, 4 = Laramie Range, 5 = Granite Mountains, 6 = Teton Range, 7 = Sierra Madre, 8 = Black Hills, 9= Gravelly Range, 10 = Ruby Range 11 = Tobacco Root Mountains, 12 = Madison Range. Modified from Yonkee
et al. (2014).
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
USGS cross section of typical Laramide structure.
Provenance: U.S. Geological survey
Reuse: This item is in the public domain and maybe reused freely without restriction.
Laramide-Style Faulting: Although the rocks of the Beartooth Mountains are ancient, the physiographic presence of the present day Beartooth Mountains is a relatively recent feature. The Beartooth Mountains are one of many Archean-cored mountain ranges that formed by uplift on high-angle Laramide-style reverse faults as seen on the adjacent figure. The Beartooth Mountains are surrounded by high angle, reverse, Laramide-style faults (Foose et al. 1961) that include the Beartooth Fault separating the Beartooth massif from the Bighorn Basin near Red Lodge, MT (Wise 2000; Neeley and Erslev 2009), the Suce Creek Fault in the northwestern corner of the range (Robbins and Erslev 1986), and the Clark Fork and Gardiner-Spanish Peaks Faults on the south (Garihan et al. 1983).
Surrounding the Beartooth Mountains, Laramide faults emplace Archean crystalline basement over the overlying Paleozoic strata, which are now in a near vertical to overturned orientation. These structures create the rimming palisades of Mississippian Madison Limestone that mimic rows of "bear's teeth" for which the range is named. Foose et al., (1961) and Wise (2000) indicate a relative vertical displacement of ~6000 meters at the range front. The Paleogene (~60-52 Ma) age of uplift was determined by apatite fission track dating (Omar et al., 1994), but more recent zircon and apatite U-Th/He dating indicates uplift may have initiated at 100 Ma and continued through Quaternary basin-and-range extension (Carrapa et al. 2019; Orme 2020; Ronemus et al., 2023). Excellent exposures of these Laramide faults are indicated in Figure 1: Suce Creek Fault south of Livingston, MT; near Nye, MT along the Mill Creek-Stillwater Fault Zone; the Beartooth Fault west of Red Lodge, MT and near Line Creek Plateau; on the southern margin of the range on the Gardiner-Spanish Peaks Fault; and, at the "Devil's Slide" area north of Gardiner, MT. Of historical interest, J. Tuzo Wilson (1936) did his dissertation on the Mill Creek-Stillwater Fault Zone that defines the boundary of the North Snowy and Stillwater Blocks against the Beartooth Block and this Precambrian structure was reactivated by Laramide-style faulting on faults such as the South Prairie Fault and Bluebird Thrust that cut the Stillwater Complex (Thacker et al., 2017). The mechanisms, locations, and timing of Laramide-style faulting provide a good case study in the evolution of geologic thought regarding the origin of contractile block uplifts (Foose et al. 1961), reactivation of Precambrian structures (e.g., Marshak et al. 2000; Thacker et al., 2017), internal deformation of hanging wall crystalline rocks (e.g., Erslev and Rogers, 1993), the role of back thrusts (Erslev 1993) and folds (Neely and Erslev, 2009), the occurrence of low-grade metamorphism and circulating fluids (e.g., Thacker et al. 2017), and the relationship of flat slab subduction and rollback of the Farallon plate to Laramide faulting to (Carrapa et al. 2019).
The Devil's Slide structure near Yankee Jim Canyon, Yellowstone River, consists of steeply dipping formations of Cambrian through Cretaceous sediments that have been tilted to near vertical orientation on the hanging wall of the Gardiner Fault. The red units include the Amsden, Chugwater and Morrison Formations. The two prominent ridges are volcanic sills that are more resistant to weathering than the surrounding sedimentary rocks.
Flatirons of Madison Limestone in the forground faulted to a near vertical orientation by the Beartooth Fault; Red Lodge ski area runs in the distance.
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
The "Devil's Slide", Yellowstone River Valley
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
"Laramide Porphyry Intrusive Rocks": The Beartooth Massif is cut by numerous late-stage igneous bodies colloquially referred to as the "Laramide Porphyry Intrusive Rocks". These were first described by Rouse et al., (1937) and the Columbia project also mapped and reported on their occurrences in numerous reports (Eckelmann and Poldervaart, 1957; Poldervaart and Bentley, 1958; Harris, 1959; Casella, 1964; Skinner, 1969). Rock types range in composition from dacitic to rhyodacitic, and may contain plagioclase and orthoclase phenocrysts (with Carlsbad twinning) up to cm-scale and that comprise up to 50% of the rock. Peyton et al., (2012) dated one of the porphyry bodies at 98-96 Ma. Mapping by Van Gosen et al., (2000) and Lopez (2001) demonstrates that the range boundary faults cut across these porphyry bodies. The most recent reports on the Laramide Porphyry rocks are from Brailer et al., (2024) (Acrobat (PDF) 5.3MB Nov24 24) and Cunningham et al., (2024) (Acrobat (PDF) 1.1MB Nov24 24) from the 2024 Tobacco Root Geological Society field conference.
Regional Laramide uplifts, basins, linear features, and other structures. State geologic map base from U.S. Geological Survey
National Geologic Map Database. From Vuke and Metesh 2020)
Provenance: From Vuke and Metesh, 2020, Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology
Reuse: This item is in the public domain and maybe reused freely without restriction.
Sedimentation in Surrounding Basins: As the Beartooth Block was uplifted, eroded sediments filled the adjacent Bighorn and Crazy Mountain Basins. Numerous studies have shown the relationship of uplift of the Laramide structures of Montana and Wyoming and related sedimentation: Decelles (1986), Dutcher et al., (1986), Decelles et al. (1991 a and b), May et al., (2013), Fan and Carrapa (2014), Welch et al., (2022). Brailer 2024 showed the cobbles of the Laramide Porphyry are present in the Late Cretaceous Frontier Formation of the Bighorn Basin. Sedimentation in these basins commenced in the Cretaceous and continued through the Paleocene. The Livingston Group is a sequence of volcanic sedimentary rocks that were deposited in the Crazy Mountain Basin and were derived from the Cretaceous Elkhorn Mountain Volcanics to the west. This unit was originally described by Weed (1893) with further studies by Roberts (1963, 1972) and Skipp and McGrew (1977). The stratigraphic position of the Livingston Group is above the Eagle Sandstone and below the Fort Union Formation (
Scarberry et al., 2021).
Thacker (2024) (Acrobat (PDF) 3.2MB Nov27 24) studied the role of the Stillwater River drainage in the tiunig of trans0range drainage incision of the Beartooth Mountains. An excellent overview of Laramide Uplifts and their surrounding sedimentary basins can be found in
Vuke and Metesh (2020) "Synorogenic basin deposits and associated Laramide uplifts in the Montana part of the Cordilleran foreland basin system."
The Absaroka Volcanics--A Major Eocene Volcanic Sequence (55-45 Ma)
Map of the Eocene Absaroka Volcanic Province, modified from Chadwick, 1970.
Provenance: USGS, Yellowstone Volcano Observatory,https://www.usgs.gov/media/images/volcanic-deposits-associated-absaroka-volcanic-province-along-eastern-and-northern
Reuse: This item is in the public domain and maybe reused freely without restriction.
Profile of Pilot and Index Peaks in the Absaroka Volcanics. The prominent white ridge is the Ordovician Bighorn Dolomite which marks the Heart Mountain Detachment.
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
The Absaroka Volcanic Supergroup is defined by a northwest trending series of eruptive centers extending ~250 km from south of Bozeman, Montana, through the northern part of Yellowstone National Park, crossing the southwestern corner of the Beartooth Mountains, and continuing southeasterly to near Cody, Wyoming (Chadwick 1970; Smedes and Prostka 1972). It is the largest Eocene volcanic field in the northern Rocky Mountains, covering an area of 23,000 km
2, with a cumulative volume of 30,000 km
3, and with thicknesses up to 1500 meters (Smedes and Prostka 1972).
Igneous Dike, Abaroka Volcanics, west side Paradise Valley
Provenance: Kurt Friehauf, Kutztown State University
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Numerous volcanic structures are evident across the volcanic field, including volcanic necks and plugs, breccia pipes, dikes and sills, and hypabyssal stocks (Chadwick 1970; Smedes and Prostka 1972). The eruptive centers are stratovolcanoes surrounded by a proximal "vent facies" of volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks, lava flows, autoclastic flow breccias, mudflows (lahars), avalanche debris, and airfall tuffs and more distil alluvial facies include well-bedded and reworked volcanigenic sedimentary rocks such as conglomerates and breccia, volcanic sandstone and siltstone, and air-fall tuff (Smedes and Prostka1972).Rocks range in composition from andesite to dacite, and Chadwick (1970) defined an eastern belt that is more potassic than the western belt which is more sodic. The Absaroka Volcanics have an eruptive history from 55-45 Ma (Feeley 2003), and Feeley and Cosca (2003) obtained a high precision
40Ar/
39Ar age of 49.6-48.1 Ma for the Sunlight volcano phase of the Absaroka Volcanics. Feeley (2003) and Feeley and Cosca (1993) provide geochemical evidence that the Absaroka Volcanic rocks were produced in response to shallow subduction of the Farallon plate in the Late Cretaceous through Paleocene. Extensive sequences of Absaroka Volcanics can be accessed in the vicinity of Cooke City, Montana, in Yellowstone National Park from the northeast entrance to Tower Junction (and Mt. Washburn), and in Paradise Valley of the Yellowstone River near Point of Rocks and also near Chico Hot springs (Chadwick 1970; Locke et al. 1985).
Petrified Forests: Specimen Ridge YNP and Tom Miner Basin
Petrified Trees, Specimen_Ridge, Yellowstone National Park
Provenance: USGS, Yellowstone Volcano Observatory, https://www.usgs.gov/media/images/standing-petrified-silicified-trees-specimen-ridge-northeastern-yellowstone-national
Reuse: This item is in the public domain and maybe reused freely without restriction.
May 1980 Post-eruption blast zone, Mount Saint Helens, WA
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
The Petrified Forests of Yellowstone National Park are preserved in the Absaroka Volcanics, and are prominently exposed on Specimen Ridge, south of the Lamar River near Tower Junction. These have been described in detail by
Dorf (1960), Tertiary Fossil Forests of Yellowstone National Park (Acrobat (PDF) 1.6MB Nov24 24) and Dorf (1980). These fossil forests cover an area of 64 km
2 to a thickness of 366 meters. Twenty-seven successive forests were formed after being sequentially wiped out by lahars and volcaniclastic fluvial deposits, followed by soil formation and rebirth of the next generation of forest. Petrified stumps still in their live upright positions are preserved throughout the area. Over 80 species of trees and shrubs have been cataloged in these deposits. Fossilization of the forest materials occurred though circulation of mineralizing Si-rich groundwater. A modern day analogue can be found around Mt. St. Helens, Washington where trees in the "blast zone" have been buried by lahar and ashfall deposits. Another occurrence of a petrified forest in the Absaroka Volcanics can be found in Tom Miner Basin, west of Yankee Jim Canyon of the Yellowstone River, ~20 miles north of Gardiner, MT.
Heart Mountain Detachment (HMD)
Geologic map of Heart Mountain Detachment Fault (bold black line separating colored upper plate from white lower plate in figure) and adjacent rocks, northwestern Wyoming. White arrow labeled “Upper plate” shows direction of movement of rocks above the Detachment (the colored units west of the detachment on the map). Sample locations discussed in text are shown. Geology is modified from Anders et al. (2010).
Provenance: Figure modified from Anders et al. (2010).
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Geologic cross-section of Heart Mountain Detachment along line A-A’. Fault lies atop Paleozoic carbonate rocks northwest of Dead Indian Pass, where it cuts across them (“ramp” shown on Figure 1). Southeast of Dead Indian, the detachment places Paleozoic carbonate rocks atop younger Mesozoic and Tertiary shales and sandstones of the Bighorn Basin. Carbonate rocks at McCulloch Peaks (MP on section) must have traveled at least 42 km in the direction of this section, which is roughly parallel to movement direction based on kinematic indicators in and above the fault zone. CC= Cooke City; J = Jim Smith Creek; WM White Mountain; DI = Dead Indian Pass; HM = Heart Mountain; MP = McCulloch Peak.
Provenance: Figure from S. Losh, https://faculty.mnsu.edu/stevenlosh/research/block-sliding-heart-mountain-detachment-wyoming/
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
The HMD is the world's is a prime example of extensional gravity-tectonics, as opposed to orogenic (i.e., compressive) processes, as recognized as far back as Bucher (1933, 1947). It is the world's largest landslide, displacing ~500 square miles (1300 sq. kilometers) a distances of at least 25 miles. Movement on the detachment occurred ~49 million years ago. Detailed mapping by Pierce (1957) identified these structures as detachment thrusts or decollements that have separated on a basal shearing plane and traveled long distances by gravitational gliding. More than 50 separate blocks have been identified ranging in size from 100s of meters to ~ 10 km, and up to750 meters thick. Heart Mountain is located in the Bighorn Basin, just north of Cody, Wyoming; this block of rock traveled almost 60 miles to the east, emplacing the lower Paleozoic carbonate rocks (Ordovician Bighorn Dolomite) over the basin fill rocks of the 55 Ma Eocene Willwood Formation. The breakaway fault located in the northwest part of Yellowstone National Park has been described by Pierce (1980). The HMD detachment surface developed in a bedding layer near the base of the Ordovician Bighorn Dolomite (Figure 8). The slip surface dips only about 2o to the southeast, but hanging wall rocks were displaced as much as 45 km into the adjacent Bighorn Basin. Hanging wall rocks include lower Paleozoic units (Ordovician Bighorn Dolomite to Mississippian Madison Limestone) and Eocene Absaroka Volcanic rocks. Members of the Eocene Cathedral Peaks Formation rest unconformably on the Mississippian Madison Limestone and are part of the allochthonous blocks. However, younger (mid-Eocene, 49 Ma; Smede and Prostka, 1992) volcanic rocks of the Wapiti Formation were erupted soon after faulting occurred and were emplaced on tectonically exposed segments of the HMD detachment zone (Pierce and Nelson 1970). To the east, the detachment surface cuts up section onto the former land surface of rocks of Tertiary age. An overview of the Absaroka Volcanics on the hanging wall of the HMD and the Ordovician Bighorn Dolomite can be seen from the Pilot and Index Vista on the Beartooth Highway. A trip down Sunlight Basin (Chief Joseph Highway) to Jim Smith Creek and White Mountain (north of Dead Indian Pass) provides direct access to seeing the HMD in situ. See the description by Steven Losh, Minnesota State University-Mankato, for an excellent detailed description of the HMD and a related website on The Geology of Wyoming--Heart Mountain.
Mechanics of the Heart Mountain Detachment--The Scientific Method as a Process of Making Hypotheses, Validating with Evidence, Revising as New Evidence Emerges....
The mechanics of the HMD are a subject of great controversy, and are a testament to the interplay between field observations, experimental and theoretical approaches to addressing geological questions.
- Bucher (1933) and Pierce (1957) proposed that the horizontal component of force that initiated the detachment was due to a large volcanic explosion.
- This interpretation was modified in Bucher (1947), supported by Pierce and Nelson (1970), with the proposition that earthquake shaking initiated and propagated the detachment faulting; upward acceleration during shaking would minimize stress normal to the HMD plane, thus minimizing frictional resistance.
- Hughes (1970a and b) interpreted the HMD as a single plate that was buoyed up on a layer of compressed volcanic gas that was sufficient to reduce friction in a mechanism he called "hovercraft tectonics". Volcanic gas, at pressures equaling and probably exceeding lithostatic pressure, was intruded laterally at the base of the Bighorn Dolomite to produce a fluidized aggregate of fluid and solid which acted as a lubricant for this exceptionally low-angle "landslide."
- This model was rejected by Pierce and Nelson (1970) based on field relations (over 50 discrete blocks were mapped, rather than a single sheet that is locally preserved as erosional remnants) and the unlikelihood that fluid pressure could be sustained over such a large area to support displacement of such a large landslide block.
- Nonetheless, numerous models propose a role of some sort for a fluidized layer to initiate and sustain movement along the HMD. For example, Aharonov and Anders (2006) proposed that dike injections into the underlying Big Horn Dolomite would intersect formational waters, heat the surrounding layers, cause trapped waters to flash to steam, and the ensuing volume expansion of the steam would result in increased fluid pressure that would overcome frictional resistance and initiate movement on the HMD.
- Goren et al. (2010) proposed a feedback mechanism involving a porous fluid-filled shear zone, shear heating, thermal pressurization and thermal decomposition of carbonate minerals to initiate displacement. They predicted a maximum sliding velocity that ranged between tens of meters per second to more than 100 m/sec and that the duration of sliding was on the order of a few tens of minutes.
- Mitchell et al. (2015) also demonstrated that catastrophic slip was aided by carbonate decomposition and release of CO2.
- Craddock et al. (2009) calculated the rate of displacement of 126–340 m/sec and that the duration of the emplacement event was less than 4 min (assuming ~ 40 miles the farthest displacement in 4 minutes, calculated to ~600 miles/hour or 965 km/hour)! But Losh, Minnesota State University-Mankato, has calculated a much more reasonable (but still amazing) 89 mile per hour rate of movement.
Whatever the mechanism, the HMD is a unique geologic phenomenon that inspires awe and wonder.
On a cultural note, Heart Mountain was the site of the infamous Heart Mountain War Reclamation Center where Japanese-Americans were interned during WWII. You might also be interested in reading the lyrical writing of Gretel Ehrlich in her novel Heart Mountain. "Ehrlich explores the twin solitudes of political exile and geographic isolation in this powerful novel—the story of Japanese Americans forced into a relocation camp—set in Wyoming during World War II." (from Goodreads). More information on the WWI Japanese American internments can be found at Wyohistory.org The Internment Camp at Heart Mountain 1942-1945 and the Densho Encyclopedia.
Heart Mountain Relocation Camp 1942-1945; WyoHistory.org
Provenance: WyoHistory.org; https://www.wyohistory.org/education/toolkit/internment-camp-heart-mountain-1942-1945
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
View of Heart Mountain Relocation Center barracks, 1942. Photo by Jack Richard. Jack Richard Collection. PN.89.111.21236.5
Provenance: (NARA record: 4682167) - U.S. National Archives and Records Administration
Reuse: This item is in the public domain and maybe reused freely without restriction.
New World Mining District
Photograph of Fisher Mountain, site of the Fisher Mountain stock and mineral deposits, viewed toward the northeast from Daisy Pass. The disturbed area in the center is the historic McLaren open-pit gold mine—last worked in 1953. Photograph taken in 1992.
Provenance: Photo from Van Gosen, 2007, USGS
Reuse: This item is in the public domain and maybe reused freely without restriction.
The Absaroka Volcanic sequence is host to numerous hard rock mineral deposits in the Cooke City area and in the Emigrant Mining District (Paradise Valley) and Independence Mining District (headwater area of the Boulder River). The New World mining district, located north of Cooke City, was first described by Lovering (1929) with subsequent geologic descriptions by Elliott et al. (1992) and Johnson and Meinert (1994). Mineral deposits were discovered as early as 1869 and mining proceeded intermittently from the 1880s through the 1920s, although these operations were challenged by the high cost of logistics and difficulties in processing the polymetallic ores (Lovering 1929). Au-Cu-Ag orebodies formed as stratobound replacement/skarn deposits (Kirk and Kirk 2002). Mineralizing hydrothermal solutions emanating from Absaroka Volcanic near-surface intrusions circulated along bedding planes in the Cambrian Meagher Limestone, in associated diatremes and breccia pipes, and adjacent to high angle contacts with hydrothermally altered porphyritic dacitic stocks (Elliott et al. 1992). Gold mineralization occurs with quartz-pyrite alteration, and formed at temperatures between 240-415
oC and in fluids with salinities between 3.6-11.8 wt% NaCl equivalency (Johnson and Meinert 1994). The McLaren open pit mine operated from 1933 to 1953 and produced 305,700 metric tons of ore with grades of 6.31 g/t Au, 8l91 g/t Ag, and 0.59% Cu (Elliott et al., 1992). More recent exploration drilling by Crown Butte Mines from 1989 to1996 led to the discovery of a "porphyry-type" copper-gold mineralized zone at depth with proven ore reserves of 7.9 MM tons averaging 0.261 opt gold, 1.05 opt silver, and 0.74% copper, and totaling 2 million ounces of gold (Kirk and Kirk 2002).
Schematic cross section illustrating the geologic setting of the stratabound Miller Creek gold-copper-silver deposits relative to the Homestake deposits. Replacement deposit material is shown as solid black.
Provenance: Image from Van Gosen, 2007, USGS
Reuse: This item is in the public domain and maybe reused freely without restriction.
Exploration ceased in 1997 when intense pressure from environmental groups raised concerns about acid rock drainage and heavy metal transport via tributary streams into Yellowstone National Park. The United States government removed the New World Mining District from mineral exploration in an agreement with Noranda-Crown Butte Mines that involved the transfer of all mineral rights to the U.S. government, a payment of $65 million for transfer of the mineral rights, and commitment of an additional $22.5 million for reclamation and remediation of historic mine sites (
van Gosen, 2007). The US Forest Service has oversight of environmental remediation in cooperation with other federal and state agencies, "to assure the achievement of the highest and best water quality practicably attainable", "...to mitigate environmental impacts that are a result of historic mining" and "..."focus on stabilizing the solid mine wastes to prevent or reduce erosion onto adjacent lands or into streams" (
van Gosen 2007). Historical mining activities are reported from other related mining districts situated in the Absaroka Volcanics including the Independence, Emigrant, and Sunlight Mining Districts (Parsons 1937; Wedow et al. 1975; Nelson et al. 1980; U.S. Geological Survey and U.S. Bureau of Mines 1983; Moyle and Buehler 1989; Hammarstrom et al. 1993; and, Elliott et al. 1993). A comprehensive summary of environmental remediation activities can be found in the
New World Mining District Response and Restoration Project, 2006, Project Summary.
Miocene Intermontane Basin
Miocene Hepburn Mesa Formation in white lake beds overlain by 2.2 Ma black, olivine-bearing basalt cap rock.
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Miocene Intermontane Basin Lake Beds: A period of extensional tectonics created a series of grabens bounded by normal faults across SW Montana (Vuke, 2020; Thomas and Sears, 2022). The easternmost of these graben basins is located in Paradise Velley where intermontane Miocene sediments dated at 16.0-14.8 Ma underlie Hepburn's Mesa. These rocks are finely laminated mudrocks and zeolitized volcanic ash units. The depositional environment is interpreted as arid, saline lake beds. This location is known to preserve mammalian rodent, early horse, camel, and tortoise fossils (Barnosky and Labar 1989; Burbank and Barnosky, 1990). Hepburn Mesa is located on East River Road of Paradise Valley, across the Yellowstone River from a Montana DOT rest stop, and west of Dailey Lake. The white sediments at the base of the outcrops are the Miocene lake sediments, and the overlying black rocks are the olivine-bearing Hepburn Mesa Basalts.
2.2 Ma Basalt Flows
Deckard Flats Basalt (2.0 Ma) over Archean Jardine Metasedimentary Sequence
Provenance: Darrell Henry, Louisiana State University
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
There are three locations of Pleistocene basalt flows on the western margin of the Beartooth Mountains. Hepburn Mesa Basalt is dated at 2.2 Ma (Smith et al., 1995; Harlan and Morgan, 2008) with
3He/
4He ratios that indicate a deep mantle source as reported in Pierce et al., (2014). The 2.2 Ma age is significant because this is the age of the first major eruptive cycle of the Yellowstone Volcanics that generated the Huckleberry Ridge Tuff. Are the two magmatic events related? No definite correlation has been made, but one model proposes that extraction of mafic melts from the mantle ponded at the base of the crust to initiate melting that produced the voluminous Huckleberry Ridge Tuff. The Hepburn Mesa Basalt may be a small sample of that mantle-derived magma that managed to escape to the surface. A second outcrop of basalt is found to the north in Paradise Valley near the town of Emigrant, MT. This is the former Merriman Quarry, now operated as the Black Diamond Quarry, and has been in operation since the 1880s as a main supply source for railroad track bedding for the Northern Pacific/Burlington Northern Railroad and for rip rap for river stabilization. Columnar joints are well-developed at this location. Basalt from this quarry was used to build the famous Roosevelt Arch at the North Entrance of Yellowstone Park. See the
Black Diamond Quarry website for more historical information. A third occurrence of these basalt formations can be found at Deckard Flats, east of Gardiner MT on the road to Jardine near the Eagle Creek Campground and confluence of Bear Creek and the Yellowstone River. Here the basalt flows were emplaced unconformably on the >2.8 Ga Jardine Metasedimentary Sequence.
Bear's Tooth Panorama.
Provenance: Darrell Henry, Louisiana State University
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Quaternary Geology--The Pleistocene Ice Age and Younger (<2 Ma)
Map showing ice cover in the Yellowstone region. Light shaded areas bounded by black and red lines indicate areas covered during the Pinedale (about 20,000-15,000 years ago) and Bull Lake (about 150,000 years ago) glaciations, respectively. Blue lines are contours in thousands of feet on the maximum reconstructed Pinedale glacier surface. The circled numbers schematically depict the southwest migration of the center of mass of the greater Yellowstone glacial system through time (in thousands of years). (Credit: Joe Licciardi and Ken Pierce, USGS. Public domain.)
Provenance: Yellowstone Volcano Observatory, USGS, https://www.usgs.gov/news/yellowstones-icy-past
Reuse: This item is in the public domain and maybe reused freely without restriction.
The spectacular Alpine scenery of the Beartooth Mountains is shaped primarily through glacial and fluvial processes. During the Pleistocene Ice Age, the Beartooth Mountains and adjacent Yellowstone Plateau were covered with ice caps in two major events: the Bull Lake Glaciation of 150,000-120,000 years ago and the Pinedale Glaciation of 20,000-12,000 years ago (Pierce, 1979; Pierce et al., 2014; Liccardi and Pierce, 2018). To produce enough pressure to force the glacial ice to flow, it is estimated that there may have been over a mile of ice on the present day's surface of the Yellowstone Plateau! The Pinedale ice flows overrode the earlier Bull Lake glacial deposits in Paradise Valley and in the Red Lodge area, and ice flow during the last glacial maximum made it as far north in Paradise Valley to the 8 Mile terminal moraine near Emigrant, Montana. A good overview of the regional glacial history is at the National Park Service site
Yellowstone's Icy Past and a comprehensive description of regional glacial history is in Pi
erce, K.L., 1979, History and dynamics of glaciation in the northern Yellowstone Park area, US Geological Survey Professional Paper 729-F, 90 p.
Rock Creek U-Shaped Valley, Looking South from Highway Vista
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Upper Rock Creek U-shaped valley, looking north towards Glacier Lake from Beartooth Pass
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
The U-shaped valley of Rock Creek south of Red Lodge Montana is a classic U-shaped glacial sculpted valley. Related glacial and periglacial features of the high Beartooth Plateau have been described by Mueller et al. (1987). These include Pinedale and Bull Lake terraces and moraines (in the Rock Creek Valley south of Red Lodge, Montana), and hanging valleys (e.g., Hellroaring Creek). In the high Beartooth Mountains, the plateau is dissected to form "biscuit board topography" (i.e., high plateaus with scalloped cliff faces surrounded by steep cirques), with cirques, aretes and tarns creating a dramatic Alpine landscape. Periglacial features include felsenmeer (German for "sea of rocks", a surface covered with angular boulders formed by fracturing in response to mechanical weathering by frost heaving), stone stripes (freeze thaw action can sort coarser rocks into surface stripes), and nivation hollows (surface depressions formed by accelerated erosion around snow banks due to freeze thaw processes).
The northern Yellowstone glacier, showing its major source areas and its outlet glacier. Heavy dashed line with double-headed arrows indicates ice divides. Smaller arrows, direction of
ice flow. Boundary between areas II and III is dotted to indicate these two areas are both part of the plateau icecap. Figure 50 from Pierce (1979)
Provenance: USGS, Pierce (1979)
Reuse: This item is in the public domain and maybe reused freely without restriction.
Ice marginal channels and dead ice topography near Chico Hot Springs. Hummocky topography in Asbaroka Volcanics west of Emigrant, MT
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Perhaps the best documented glacial history in Beartooth Country is preserved in Paradise Valley, as reported by Pierce (1979). Detailed descriptions of the glacial and other physiographic features of Paradise Valley can be accessed in the detailed road log of Locke, et al, 1995,
The middle Yellowstone Valley from Livingston to Gardiner, Montana; a microcosm of Northern Rocky Mountain geology. Key glacial features include:
- Deposits from both the Yellowstone outlet glacier and Alpine glaciers flowing from the high Beartooth Mountains are evident. The framework for the glacial history of this area was established by Pierce (1979) and includes features formed by the Yellowstone outlet glacier such as the Pinedale terminal and recessional moraines that were deposited as much as 50 km north of Yellowstone National Park (Pierce et al. 2014). The terminal Pinedale moraine, called the Eight Mile Moraine, that formed from the Yellowstone outlet glacier forms a lobate deposit near the town of Emigrant (Pierce, 1979).
- Glacial deposits can be dated by cosmogenic isotopic methods to obtain surface exposure ages (the time since a rock was deposited at the surface of the Earth). Earth is always being bombarded with cosmic rays, and these high energy particles (protons and alpha particles) can interact with atoms to produce cosmogenic nuclides. In response to this flux of cosmic rays, 16O will convert to 10Be and 28Si will convert to 26Al. As with other radiometric dating methods, the longer the exposure to cosmic rays, the larger the proportion of cosmogenic daughter products. Sampling quartz-rich cobbles and boulders on glacial moraines will provide the cosmogenic age of deposition of the moraine. Licciardi and Pierce (2018) obtained 10Be ages of 16.5 ± 1.4 to 14.2 ± 1.2 ka for the Pinedale moraines in Paradise Valley.
- Remnants of Bull Lake glacial moraines (ca. 150-140 ka) are preserved in the northern part of Paradise Valley (Locke et al. 1995).
- The Pine Creek drainage is glaciated with lateral and terminal Pinedale moraines forming along the creek and into Paradise Valley. A diamicton unit (mixed, unsorted boulders, cobble, and sands in a muddy matrix) crops out on East River Road that may either be a glacial till or landslide deposit.
- Glacial landforms in Paradise Valley on the western margin of the Beartooth Mountains include terminal and lateral moraines, glacial outwash deposits, dry abandoned channels, stagnant ice kettle topography and eskers near Pray, MT, and paired cut-and-fill terraces.
- Flood Bars: just north of Gardiner, MT, (~4 miles north of Roosevelt Arch and the Gardiner High School), Pierce (1973) described megaripples similar to those developed in the Washington Scablands related to the Lake Missoula floods. The megaripples have wavelengths of ~10 meters and heights of 1-2 meters. The floodwaters are estimated to have been 200 feet (60 meters). Pierce (1979) interpreted these features as deposits that formed from catastrophic glacier-dammed lake outbursts. Similar flood bars are found at the mouth of Yankee Jim Canyon that may have formed both from glacial lake outbursts, and younger deposits that formed from breaching the landslide that dammed Yankee Jim Canyon (Pierce, 1979).
Holocene--Present Day Geologic Processes
Quaternary Faults of Western Montana
Provenance: Figure from Gavillot et al., 2020, Montana Bureau of Mines
Reuse: This item is in the public domain and maybe reused freely without restriction.
Neotectonics and Seismicity: Montana is still rocking and rolling! SW Montana is located in the Intermountain Seismic Belt, and earthquakes can happen at any time. Haller et al., (2000) have compiled
Data for Quaternary faults in western Montana . The Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology has provided an online
Interactive Earthquake Map that is a compilation of the distribution and magnitude of historical earthquakes in the region.
Basin and Range Style Faulting--Active Tectonics. The easternmost extension of Basin-and-Range extensional faulting is expressed as the western boundary fault of the Absaroka-Beartooth Range. The Emigrant Fault is mapped from near Suce Creek south to the Dome Mountain area in Paradise Valley; splays of this fault are recognized as the Deep Creek and Luccock Park Faults (Roberts, 1964; Personius, 1982). Bonini et al., (1972) conducted a gravity survey in Paradise Valley and reported an 18,000 foot (5500m) vertical displacement on the Deep Creek Fault. They interpreted that several thousand feet of Tertiary sediment valley fill as well as 4,000 feet of volcanic breccias are preserved in the valley. Montagne and Chadwick (1982) describe a fault scarp at Pool Creek at the north end of Paradise Valley that cuts a Bull Lake lateral moraine but is buried by a Pinedale moraine which brackets the age of movement between 150,000 and 20,000 years. An active fault that cuts alluvial fans is recognized on the flank of Dome Mountain just south of Point of Rocks in Paradise Valley. This fault is at least 10 km (6 miles) long and is the longest segment of the Deep Creek Fault system--the fault cuts both Pinedale moraines and alluvial fans, attesting to the recent movements on this fault (Personius, 1982). The LIDAR image below clearly shows the trace of the fault scarp. LIDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) is a remote sensing method that very precisely measures and produces images of the 3-D topographic surface of the Earth. LIDAR produces "bare Earth" images as it is capable of seeing through vegetative cover. The second LIDAR image shows a major prehistoric landslide that formed as a result of a major paleoseismic event that occurred near Yankee Jim Canyon. This massive landslide dammed the Yellowstone River and formed sandy lake deposits as far as 14 miles upstream to Gardiner, Montana (Locke et al. 1995). This earthquake-dammed lake is analogous to the famous 1959 Hebgen Lake Earthquake that also caused a massive landslide that dammed the Madison River to form Earthquake Lake.
LIDAR Image of Emigrant fault scarp,Dome Mountain, Paradise Valley
Provenance: USGS Yellowstone Volcano Observatory
Reuse: This item is in the public domain and maybe reused freely without restriction.
LIDAR Image of Landslides, Yankee Jim Canyon
Provenance: USGS Yellowstone Volcano Observatory
Reuse: This item is in the public domain and maybe reused freely without restriction.
Regional Uplift in Response to the Yellowstone Hot Spot: There has been considerable regional uplift due to inflation of the crust overlying the Yellowstone Hot Spot (Pierce and Morgan, 1992). This has had a profound effect on the organization of drainage basins in the area, leaving behind instances of ancestral abandoned river channels of the Yellowstone River.
Active landslide deposits, alluvial fans, debris flows, and hummocky topography attest to the continuing dynamic landscape evolution as seen throughout Paradise Valley. This is particularly evident at the unconformity between the Archean basement and the overlying Eocene Absaroka Volcanic units, where this slip surface is responsible for active landsliding and formation of hummocky topography, particularly on the west side of Paradise Valley. These landslide deposits are particularly prominent near the Rock Creek and Big Creek areas. These mass wasting processes present significant geohazards that are expected to impact the rapid human development that is in progress in this area.
Armstrong Spring Creek, Paradise Valley Montana
Provenance: Montana Angler, https://www.montanaangler.com/montana-spring-creek-fishing/armstrong-spring-creek
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Hydrology: The northern reach of Paradise Valley hosts world famous "blue ribbon" spring creek trout streams. These form through northward flow of groundwater under the regional hydraulic gradient through Cenozoic fluvial valley fill deposits (sands, conglomerates). These aquifer deposits thin and are constricted by the narrowing of the valley at the north end of the valley, forcing upwelling of groundwater to feed the spring creeks (Locke et al. 1995). The emergent waters have constant temperatures and high nutrient value that sustain this world-class fishery.
Hot Springs: In addition, Paradise Valley is host to Chico Hot Springs and LaDuke Hot Springs. Both hot springs are fault-controlled. Chico Hot Springs Resort is located at the intersection of the Mill Creek-Stillwater Fault Zone and the Deep Creek Fault (Chadwick and Leonard, 1979). A deep-seated water source related to Yellowstone magmatism is ruled out by helium isotopic data (Kharaka, 1991). Chadwick and Leonard (1979) report: "...the Chico system appears to obtain its heat from deep circulation of groundwater without a magmatic component... similar to many other hot springs in the Northern Rocky Mountain region where deep circulation of groundwater in fractured crystalline rocks and/or at extensional valley bounding normal faults produces hot springs." LaDuke hot springs is located adjacent to the Gardiner-Spanish Peaks Laramide Fault. At LaDuke Hot Springs, plans to develop geothermal energy systems on were quite controversial as there was concern that these activities might disrupt the hydrology of Mammoth Hot Springs in Yellowstone National Park. Geochemical studies of the spring waters (Kharaka et al. 1991) indicate there was low probability of interconnection with the Mammoth Hot Spring system and Sorey (1991) concluded "sustained production of this well at rates near the flow of LaDuke Hot Springs would pose no risk of adverse effects on thermal features in Yellowstone National Park". Nonetheless, concerns persisted and in 1995 the U.S. House of Representatives passed the "Old Faithful Protection Act" that would have established a 15-mile buffer zone around Yellowstone National Park to restrict development of hydrothermal resources. This legislation was not ratified by the U.S. Senate. Nonetheless, the State of Montana and Yellowstone National Park have established plans for long-term monitoring of this hydrothermal system. LaDuke Hot Springs has now been developed as a destination recreational resort--Yellowstone Hot Springs Resort , and Chico Hot Springs Resort has been in operation since 1900.
Chico Hot Springs Resort
Provenance: Chico Hot Springs Resort, https://www.chicohotsprings.com/
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Yellowstone Hot Springs Resort
Provenance: Yellowstone Hot Springs Resort, https://yellowstonehotspringsmt.com/
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Jardine Travertine Deposits: Located just east of Gardiner on the road to Jardine, these travertine deposits are similar to the travertine deposits at Mammoth Hot Springs. They are outside Yellowstone National Park and have been quarried for building stone. Pierce et al., (1991) report U-Th ages of 19.57 +/- 0.12 Ka and 22.64 +/- 0.17 Ka.
Gold Mining at Emigrant Gulch: Emigrant Peak, above Chico Hot Springs, is one of many eruptive centers in the Absaroka Volcanic Province that is host to metallic deposits that have been prospected and mined. Stotelmeyer et al., (1983) report that placer gold was discovered at the mouth of Emigrant Creek. Up until 1882, lands of the Yellowstone River Valley were part of the Crow Indian Reservation, but in that year these lands were removed from the reservation, opening a gold rush into this area. Reed (1950) reports that there was only minor production of Au from quartz vein lode deposits. Placer gold production is reported back to 1901 with minor operations through 1940, and a large bucket dredge was operated in 1941-42. Total placer production from 1901 through 1959 was 15,606 ounces (Reed, 1950). The placer dredge tailings can still be seen in the vicinity of Old Chico (this is private property).
Hydraulic mining at Emigrant Gulch 1885
Provenance: Western Mining History,https://westernmininghistory.com/10183/principal-gold-districts-of-montana/
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Emigrant Placer Dredge Tailings
Provenance: Kurt Friehauf, Kutztown State University
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Climate Change in Beartooth Country
Whitebark Pine, YNP
Provenance: NPS, YUellowstone National Park, from https://www.nps.gov/yell/learn/how-important-is-whitebark-pine-to-grizzly-bears.htm
Reuse: This item is in the public domain and maybe reused freely without restriction.
The impacts of climate change are evident throughout the landscapes and ecosystems of Beartooth Country: extreme weather events, floods, droughts, impacts on habitat (e.g., distribution of white bark pine critical to survival of grizzly bears), introduction of invasive species....See the full story in these two important climate change assessments. The recent article by Pederson et al., (2025) documents exposure of a stand of centuries old whitebark pine due to melting of perennial ice patches on the Beartooth Plateau. "In the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem of the Rocky Mountains (United States), recent melting of an high-elevation (3,091 m asl) ice patch exposed a mature stand of whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis) trees, located ~180 m in elevation above modern treeline, that date to the mid-Holocene (c. 5,950 to 5,440 cal y BP). Here, we used this subfossil wood record to develop tree-ring-based temperature estimates for the upper-elevation climate conditions that resulted in ancient forest establishment and growth and the subsequent regional ice-patch growth and downslope shift of treeline. Results suggest that mid-Holocene forest establishment and growth occurred under warm-season (May-Oct) mean temperatures of 6.2 °C (±0.2 °C), until a multicentury cooling anomaly suppressed temperatures below 5.8 °C, resulting in stand mortality by c. 5,440 y BP."
- Whitlock C, Cross W, Maxwell B, Silverman N, Wade AA., 2017, 2017 Montana Climate Assessment. Bozeman and Missoula MT: Montana State University and University of Montana, Montana Institute on Ecosystems. 318 p. doi:10.15788/m2ww8w. https://montanaclimate.org/chapter/title-page
- Hostetler, S., Whitlock, C., Shuman, B., Liefert, D., Drimal ,C,. Bischke, S., 2021. Greater Yellowstone climate assessment: past, present, and future climate change in greater Yellowstone watersheds. Bozeman MT: Montana State University, Institute on Ecosystems. 260 p. https://doi.org/10.15788/GYCA2021. https://www.gyclimate.org/
- Pederson, G.T., Stahle, D., McWethy, D.B., Toohey, M., Jungclaus, J., Lee, C., Martin, J., Alt, M., Kichas, N., Chellman, N. and McConnell, J.R., 2025 (Acrobat (PDF) 9.4MB Jan18 25). Dynamic treeline and cryosphere response to pronounced mid-Holocene climatic variability in the US Rocky Mountains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(2), p.e2412162121.
Epilogue: June 2022 Flood
On June 13, 2022, a warm rain-on-snow event triggered a massive melting and flooding event. Access roads to the North and Northeast Entrances of Yellowstone National Park were wiped out. Major impacts to infrastructure were suffered, including bridge collapse and road washouts in the entire region. The towns of Gardiner and Red Lodge, Montana were inundated by floodwaters. For context, the 100-year average peak discharge of the Yellowstone River at Corwin Springs, MT (just north of Gardiner, MT and the North Entrance of YNP) is 16,000 cfs, and the record discharge was ~30,000 cfs in 1918. In the 2022 flood event, discharge reached 49,000 cfs (!), and this event has subsequently been branded a "1000 year flood". The North (Gardiner)and Northeast (Cooke City) entrances to YNP have now been repaired and are open to tourism again, but the consequences of this catastrophic event will be felt by the impacted communities for years to come. McManamay et al., (2025) report annual business revenue losses varied by gateway community, averaging 48 % but as high as 100 %, and estimated $156 million USD losses in 2022 in visitor spending, primarily from park closures, exceeding economic losses from the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020.
Geology in Action:
Flood Debris, Yellowstone River, June 2022
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Flood Damage, Red Lodge, MT, June 2022
Provenance: Dave Mogk, Montana State University-Bozeman
Reuse: This item is offered under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ You may reuse this item for non-commercial purposes as long as you provide attribution and offer any derivative works under a similar license.
Aerial photo from a helicopter of damage to the north entrance road, between Gardiner, MT, and Mammoth Hot Springs, Yellowstone National Park, due to June 2022 flooding. National Park Service photo by Doug Kraus, June 13, 2022.
Provenance: U.S. Geological Survey, https://www.usgs.gov/observatories/yvo/news/how-might-devastating-june-2022-floods-and-around-yellowstone-national-park
Reuse: This item is in the public domain and maybe reused freely without restriction.
[
YNP Flooding June 2022 Lamar Valley
Provenance: National Park Service
Reuse: This item is in the public domain and maybe reused freely without restriction.
There you have it! 4 billion years of Earth history revealed in a single mountain range: the remarkable Beartooth Mountains.