Investigating Meteorites: Bridging Earth Science to Space Science
This activity is designed for a middle school classroom of primarily gifted students, but can be modified and/or used as a subset of a differential learning activity (see teaching notes for more information). This activity is designed to have students apply previous knowledge about Earth Science to investigate iron-nickel meteorites. Students should have previous knowledge of crystal size/cooling rate correlation in Earth rocks and previous knowledge of Earth's composition. Students will investigate meteorites (real or photographed with scale) using a series of guided questions. They will practice using observation and inference skills as well as data collection skills.
From this activity students should:
-discover that some meteorites come from the cores of previously existing planets (parent bodies).
-discover that making measurements can be used to gain more understanding of a meteorite (specifically: measuring crystal width could correlate to cooling rate and then parent body size)
-discover that knowledge learned in one discipline (Geology) can be applied to another (Space Science) [Specifically the cooling/crystal size correlation seen in Earth Rocks like granite can be applied to space science].
-Practice both using observation and inference and distinguishing between the two.
-Communicate their observations and inferences to classmates
-Practice measuring with a ruler and practice recording measurements
-Practice formulating questions about observations of an iron-nickel meteorite
-Information discrimination: students should gain practice determining which types of information would be relevant to answer the questions they have developed about their observations.
Context for Use
This activity is designed to be an in-class guided inquiry lab investigation with follow-up homework required by the student. It is designed for a class with a maximum of 20 students, because verbal individualized teacher guidance should be provided to each group of students. The lab component of the activity can be completed in a single 50-minute class period. One homework assignment and a 30- minute follow-up discussion are also needed.
A meteorite is any rocky body that has fallen to Earth. These sometimes
impact Earth with a range of effects related to the size of the meteorite-
sometimes they impact with minimal effect and sometimes they impact with
catastrophic effects, vaporizing the meteorite itself and causing mass
extinctions. Evidence of this can be seen in Earth's history; for example,
the chixuclub . Scientists and the
general public did not widely accept that rocks on Earth could have fallen from
space until the eighteenth century.
<p class="MsoNormal">Differentiation of Planets- In
order for a planet or asteroid to have layers of differing composition, the
body needs to be large enough to differentiate, that is to form layers where
the densest materials sink to the middle forming a dense core.<b style="mso-bidi-font-weight:normal">
<p class="MsoNormal">Meterorites are classified mostly based on
composition into chondrites, achondrites, iron and stony-iron meteorites. There
are further sub-categories of each of these classifications. These meteorites
have been providing scientists with a large amount of useful information about
the formation and composition of the solar systems, as well as useful
information about the particular parent bodies from whence they came.
<p class="MsoNormal">Chondrites: Some meteorites have come from parent
bodies that are likely undifferentiated and exhibit metal mixed with silicate
material. Current scientific
<p class="MsoNormal">understanding considers chondrites to be composed of the most primitive
solar system material and the other classes of meteorites to be composed from
larger solar system bodies that formed more recently than the chondrite
material. Chondrites are considered primitive because their composition is
similar to the Sun's composition. This is based on the idea that the sun is a
good measure of average solar system composition because it contains more than
99% of the material in the solar system. There are also a few other techniques, such as
measuring decay rates of radioactive elements, that help to confirm their
primitive status. Chondrites are named for chondrules; round grains containing
crystal and glass- thought to be droplets that condensed from a liquid.
Radiometric dating ages them at about 4.566
billion years old, with some tiny grains such as micro-diamonds even
older than this date. These microdiamonds are thought to be likely survivors of
a previous supernova.
<p class="MsoNormal">Achondrites: Achondrites are igneous, having
crysallized from a silicate melt and they do not contain chondrules. Because
they are igneous, they are thought to be remnants of differentiated
planetesimals (or dwarf planets). Some achondrites have been matched to their respective
parent bodies, Mars, Earth's Moon and Vesta.
<p class="MsoNormal">Iron Meteorites:
<p class="MsoNormal">In order for a planet or asteroid to have layers of differing
composition, the body needs to be large enough to differentiate, that is to form
layers where the densest materials sink to the middle forming a dense core. So,
meteorites composed of iron and nickel crystals (and almost no silicates) are
thought to be from the cores of planetary bodies that have since been
shattered. As in Earth geology, the size of the crystal is correlated to its
cooling rate, which in turn, can be related to the size of the original body.
This is based on the idea that a larger body would cool more slowly. Most of these iron meterorites, with the
exception of those containing very small or very large amounts of nickel, have
a Widmannstatten pattern which is a intergrowth of crystals (this pattern can
only be observed if the meteorite is polished and etched) Scientists would
measure the different alloys of iron and nickel to ascertain more precise cooling rates (this will be
simplified for middle school students by having them measure crystals
<p class="MsoNormal">As with the other categories of meteorites, iron meteorites are also
further classified. One of these classifications is based on cooling rate. For
example, one class has been calculated to have cooled extremely quickly at a
rate of 2100 F (1000C) per hour with the corresponding
parent body having a size of 24 miles (40 km) in radius. Another class has been
calculated to have cooled at 90F (50C) per year. Overall,
the iron meteorites that have been studied seem to come from parent bodies
ranging from 6-105 miles (10-170 km) in radius.
<p class="MsoNormal">The parent bodies yielding iron meteorites are thought to have fully
solidified by 4.6 billion years ago. Using cosmic ray techniques (discussed in
next section), these meteorites are thought to have broken from their parent
bodies and been in space for times ranging from 200 million years-1 billion years
before landing on Earth.
<p class="MsoNormal">Stony Iron meteorites- These
meteorites are composed of almost equal parts silicate and metal. These
meteorites have compositions in between iron meteorites and achondrites, so are
thought to be from differentiated parent bodies with incorporated core and
mantle- some of these mixtures are difficult for scientists to explain. These
stony iron meteorites can also be broken down into finer classes.
<p class="MsoNormal">Some additional interesting information that can be
gathered from meteorites in general:
<p class="MsoNormal">-On Earth, the minerals olivine and pyroxene are usually found in
igneous rocks- these minerals can also be seen in meteorites, indicating that
the original parent body formed by crystallizing from a liquid.
<p class="MsoNormal">-Iron and nickel is also found in meteorites, but the alloys of these in
meteorites (taenite and kamacite) are very rare on the surface of Earth. These
are hypothesized to be what would be found in Earth's core.
<p class="MsoNormal">-Cosmic rays damage the minerals in meteorites while they are traveling
in space. This can be measured and correlated to the length of time the object
was in space. Because exposure age is younger than the age of formation of the
parent body, this suggests that these objects were part of a larger body that
has since broken up- possibly due to collision with another asteroid. Being
part of this parent body would be what once shielded it from damage from cosmic
rays. Meteorites that have fallen to Earth appear to be from parent bodies that
broke up early in the solar system.
<p class="MsoNormal">-As meteorites fall through Earth's atmosphere, they from an outer crust
due to partial frictional melting as a result of falling through the
<p class="MsoNormal">-In addition to determining size of the parent body from crystal size, cooling
rates and thus size can be calculated using fission tracks (for more
information on this, see Asteroids, Meteorites, and Comets by Linda
<p class="MsoNormal">-Some meteorites have been matched to their parent bodies by matching
composition. Some achondrites have been found to have originated on Mars, the
Moon and Vesta and were broken off by meteorite impacts.
Description and Teaching Materials
<p class="MsoNormal"> Students will be measuring crystal sizes of iron nickel meteorites and correlating this to the cooling rate and the size of the meteorite's respective parent body.
<p class="MsoNormal">1. Students should be grouped into groups of 2-3.
2. Meteorites (real or photocopied) and other materials should be provided to each group.Student lab images (if not using actual samples) (Microsoft Word 2007 (.docx) 324kB Apr3 12)
3. Students should write down their general observations about these meterorites. (They should know the difference between an observation and an inference).
4.AAfter making observations, students should be provided with the background information below: (the remainder of the background information can be given for homework)
You become curious about meteorites and go on a meteorite hunting expedition where you find the meteorites pictured. You read some articles/ letters/ books with fancy names like:
Iron meteorites: Crystallization, thermal history, parent bodies, and origin by J.I. Goldsteina, E.R.D. Scottb, N.L. Chabot
Iron meteorite evidence for early formation and catastrophic disruption of protoplanets by Jijin Yang, Joseph I. Goldstein & Edward R. D. Scott
Asteroids, Meteorites, And Comets by Linda T. Elkins-Tanton
From your reading, you find that scientists estimate different cooling rates for iron meteorites.For example, one class of these meteorites has been calculated to have cooled extremely quickly at a rate of 2100 F (1000C) per hour with the corresponding parent body having a size of 24 miles (40 km) in radius. Another class has been calculated to have cooled at 90F (50C) per year. Overall, the iron meteorites that have been studied seem to come from parent bodies ranging from 6-105 mile (10-170 km) radius.
5. After reading this background information, students should be guided in their inquiry so that they discover that they could make measurements of the crystals using the guided questions below:
a.How can you use this background information to make inferences about your iron meteorites? (Hint: think back to what you know about crystal sizes in igneous rocks, like granite, on Earth).
b.What further observations might you make to gather more information? (students should puzzle this out a while and then, if needed, be prompted by the teacher to measure the crystals and to create a data table)
6. Students should create a data table to record the meteorite number, the trial number (10 or more measurements recommended), the measured crystal width, and average crystal width for each meteorite.
They should measure the width of at least 10 crystals per meteorite and then calculate an average.
Sample data table
Crystal width measurement:
Average Crystal Width
8. Students should then answer the following questions:
a.What are some potential problems with your data? (sources of error)
b.What, if anything, can you infer about the cooling rate of each of the parent bodies from which these meteorites came? Why did you make this inference?
c.What, if anything, can you infer about the size of each of the parent bodies from which these meteorites came? Why did you make this inference?
d.What, if anything, can you infer about from what part of a parent body these meteorites came? Why did you make this inference?
e.In order to a parent body to differentiate, the more dense materials need to sink to the center. What can you infer about the state of matter of a parent body during differentiation?
f.What are some other inferences you can make after observing these meteorites?
g.What additional data could you gather?
9. Students should be directed to read the remainder of the background information (and/or research meteorites on their own) for homework.
10. The following class period, a general discussion should be held to go over the lab work and the homework questions. This should be designed to allow students to solidify their understanding and help clear up confusion that may have arisen during the inquiry portion of the lab.
At Home Assignments
In class, you looked at iron-nickel meteorites. Read the provided background information. Answer the following questions and be prepared to answer your classmates' questions and your teacher's questions about your observations and inferences:
a. Scientists cannot sample cores of planets. How could the data you collected in class today be useful to the study of other planets?
b. Can you calculate a cooling rate and parent body size from your data? If so, make the calculations here. If not, explain what additional information you would need and explain where you would get this information.
c. List the categories of meteorites in addition to the iron meteorites you observed in class.
d. List one interesting fact about each of the classes of meteorites.
-Two or three iron nickel meteorites per group- these can be actual samples or photocopied photographs with scale. (The meteorites should each have different crystal widths) Student lab images (if not using actual samples) (Microsoft Word 2007 (.docx) 324kB Apr3 12)
-ruler for each group
-background information on meteorites (optional if students research on their own)
National Science Education Standards for levels 5-8 addressed in the activity:
SCIENCE AS INQUIRY STANDARDS:Abilities necessary to do scientific inquiry/Understanding about scientific inquiry
UNIFYING CONCEPTS AND PROCESSES: Evidence, models, and explanation
HISTORY AND NATURE OF SCIENCE: Nature of Science
SPACE SCIENCE STANDARDS:Earth in the solar system
Teaching Notes and Tips
<p class="MsoNormal">This activity will be field-tested in May 2012, but
one common student misconception is that most meteorites burn up in the
atmosphere. This is true for sand-sized
meteorites, but anything larger does not loose a significant portion (unless it
is so large as to vaporize on impact).<p class="MsoNormal">
Assessing student completion of the student lab worksheet and the homework questions can be used to determine students' general lab work/participation and their management of lab data. After students have been provided time, discussion and additional information to cement the knowledge gained from the lab, students could be assessed on a more formal test or quiz.
References and Resources
Books for additional information/photographs about meteorites:
Meteorites and their Parent Planets by Harry Y. McSween Jr
Asteroids, Meteorites, And Comets by Linda T. Elkins-Tanton
Websites for iron meteorite images and additional meteorite information: http://www.museumwales.ac.uk/en/837/
Investigating Meteorites: Bridging Earth Science to Space Science --Discussion
Katye, this is gorgeous! You've put a lot of work into making a thorough investigation, congratulations!
I'm glad you acknowledge that the crystal measurement is a simplification for your students. It turns out that a lot of the cooling rate calculations were done based also on nickel content of the crystals, beyond what can be done in the classroom.
Please keep updating and be sure to let us know how this goes in the classroom! And let me know if there are specific areas I could help with; on the whole you've got a great activity here.
edittextuser=3776 post_id=18343 initial_post_id=0 thread_id=5415
This post was editted by Ellen Doris on Aug, 2011
Hello Katye -
I like the way you've structured this to begin with general observations of the images, followed with some information and the measurement activity. It sounds engaging. The issue of the nickel content, which can't be determined by kids in the classroom, puts me in mind of a comment Laura (the teacher who visited at the end of the course) made. She noted that she finds herself pointing out and discussing the complexities of the content more, as a way of helping students understand it, rather than trying to make it more clear by oversimplifying. Your activity presents that opportunity. It would be great for kids to be able to read or hear how some particular meteorites were studied and their age determined. (Recommendations for readings, anyone?) Thanks for the extensive background, specific sources, and details about how you will frame this for students. I'll hope to hear more as the school year goes along!
edittextuser=3872 post_id=18345 initial_post_id=0 thread_id=5415
Join the Discussion
Log in to reply