Pedagogy in Action > Library > Inventing and Testing Models > Examples > Judging a Paper Airplane Contest

Judging a Paper Airplane Contest

This page was authored by the CATALST Group at the University of Minnesota, based on an original activity by Tamara Moore and Gillian Roehrig. Moore and Roehrig are also at the University of Minnesota.

This activity has been undergone anonymous peer review.

This activity was anonymously reviewed by educators with appropriate statistics background according to the CAUSE review criteria for its pedagogic collection.


This page first made public: Nov 3, 2009

This material was originally developed through CAUSE
as part of its collaboration with the SERC Pedagogic Service.

Summary

This model-eliciting activity has students determine how to create a fair judging scheme for a paper airplane contest while considering both the most accurate paper airplane and the best floater. Students are given a sample of data that includes multiple flights of paper airplanes by three different pilots. Each team writes a report describing how their judging scheme can be implemented by the judges of the contest. This activity could serve as an introduction to ideas of central tendency and variability. It can also set the stage for understanding the correspondence between data sets and their graphical representations. Alternatively, the activity could be the basis for student introduction to analysis of variance.

Learning Goals

This activity has the following goals:

  1. Expose students to a real-world problem with real data.
  2. Expose students to ideas of central tendency and variability.
  3. Provide students with a conceptual understanding of analysis of variance.
  4. Engage students in statistical thinking and working as a team.


Context for Use

This activity:


Description and Teaching Materials

  1. Media article: Students individually read the media article to become familiar with the context of the problem. This handout is available here. Paper Airplane Media Article (Microsoft Word 571kB Oct8 09)
  2. Readiness questions: Students individually answer these questions about the media article to become even more familiar with the context and begin thinking about the problem. This handout is available here. Paper Airplane Readiness Questions (Microsoft Word 25kB Oct8 09)
  3. Problem statement: In teams of three or four, students are given the problem statement and work on the problem in a group for 30 - 45 minutes. This time range depends on the amount of self-reflection and revision you want the students to do. The handout is available here. Paper Airplane Problem Statement (Microsoft Word 60kB Oct8 09)
    Note: There are two additional files that may also be provided to students: Scatterplots that graphically represent the data Paper Airplane Scatterplots (Microsoft Word 691kB Oct8 09); or the actual data as a Fathom file if the instructor wants students to analyze the data themselves Paper Airplane Fathom Data ( 8kB Aug26 09).
  4. Process of sharing solutions: Each team writes their solution in a letter or memo to the client. Then, each team presents their solution to the class. Whole class discussion is integrated with these presentations to discuss the different solutions, the statistics involved, and the effectiveness of the different solutions in meeting the needs of the client.

The following supplies and materials are recommended for this activity.


Teaching Notes and Tips

  1. It is useful to prepare the students to work on this activity by having them make and fly paper airplanes. One recommended activity created by NASA is called "How does an airplane fly?" and can be found at http://www.eweek.org/site/DiscoverE/activities/airplane.pdf.
  2. The purpose of the media article and the readiness questions is to introduce the students to the context of the problem. Depending on the grade level and/or your instructional purposes, you may want to use a more teacher-directed format or a more student-directed format for going through the article and the questions.
  3. Place the students in teams of three or four. If you already use teams in your classroom, it is best if you continue with these same teams since results may be better when the students have already developed a working relationship.
  4. Encourage (but don't require or assign) the students to select roles such as timer, collector of supplies, writer of letter, etc.
  5. Remind the students that they should share the work of solving the problem.
  6. As students work in groups, the teacher's role should be one of a facilitator and observer. Avoid questions or comments that steer the students toward a particular solution. Try to answer student questions with questions so that the student teams come to their own solutions.
  7. Watch the time and try to urge groups on if they are falling behind.
  8. If students seem to get off task and are not focusing on the data provided, direct them back to the actual data and task.
  9. If more follow-up is desired, after presentations and discussion,allow students to resume their groups and modify their models.


Assessment

Assessment is an integral part of a model-eliciting activity. Each group is required to write a report to a "client" that describes their model, the reasoning that led to the model, and a justification of all decisions that are made based on the model. Group reports may be assessed for their clarity, completeness and the soundness of the explanations and justifications. In addition, instructors can decide if they wish to evaluate the students' presentations. Example rubric and scoring methods for student reports and presentations can be found at: https://engineering.purdue.edu/ENE/Research/SGMM/Problems/CASESTUDIESKIDSWEB/casestudies/airport/tools.htm

Follow-up questions to the activity may be used to assess student learning outcomes. For example,

Additional assessment items may be used depending on the purpose for using the activity and the nature of the course.


References and Resources

See more Examples »


« Judging Randomness       Judging Airlines »