Introduction -- Discussion http://serc.carleton.edu/p2p_redux/intro.html#discussion To the bulleted ... http://serc.carleton.edu/p2p_redux/intro.html#post21754 "a library of high quality online educational resources in support of teaching and learning STEM topics, particularly for K-16 and informal audiences." or something to that effect. Just referencing the website does not convey the library and its collections.]]> karon kelly 1349906160 http://serc.carleton.edu/p2p_redux/intro.html#post21754 I have two, ... http://serc.carleton.edu/p2p_redux/intro.html#post21758 1) I might rename the "A Final Editorial Comment" to "An Editorial Comment," and append an additional (parallel) thought such that the paragraph concludes:
"... While this report does not attempt to provide a complete picture of NSDL, we believe it summarizes and highlights a number of the most significant lessons learned and the contributions made by the hundreds of individuals who worked to advance STEM education as part of the NSDL program. Likewise it reaches no single, definitive conclusion about the success or failure of the endeavor; rather, it presents a nuanced view, incorporating perceptions of success and of disappointment across a complex multifaceted endeavor."
2) I would prefer changing "Who Should Read this Report" to "Who May Benefit from this Report," with parallel changes such that the final sentence reads: "The authors hope the following audiences will find the essays useful:"]]>
Dave Fulker 1350616080 http://serc.carleton.edu/p2p_redux/intro.html#post21758