May 2005 Journal of Geoscience Education
Volume 53, Number 3Teaching Methods in Undergraduate Geoscience Courses: Results of the 2004 On the Cutting Edge Survey of U.S. Faculty
R. Heather Macdonald, Department of Geology, College of William and Mary
Cathryn A. Manduca, Science Education Resource Center, Carleton College
David W. Mogk, Department of Earth Sciences, Montana State University
Barbara J. Tewksbury, Department of Geology, Hamilton College
URL for this article: http://www.nagt.org/nagt/jge/abstracts/may05.html#v53p237
An Indoor Shopping Mall Building Stone Investigation with Handheld Technology for Introductory Geoscience Students
Laura A. Guertin, Earth Science, Penn State Delaware County
URL for this article: http://www.nagt.org/nagt/jge/abstracts/may05.html#v53p253
The Three-Point Problem, Vector Analysis and Extension to the N-Point Problem
Michael N. Fienen, Environmental Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University
URL for this article: http://www.nagt.org/nagt/jge/abstracts/may05.html#v53p257
Probing Understanding in Physical Geology Using Concept Maps and Clinical Interviews
Amy C. Englebrecht, Department of Geology and Physics, Lake Superior State University
Joel J. Mintzes, Department of Biology, University of North Carolina - Wilmington
Lewis M. Brown, Department of Geology and Physics, Lake Superior State University
Paul R. Kelso, Department of Geology and Physics, Lake Superior State University
URL for this article: http://www.nagt.org/nagt/jge/abstracts/may05.html#v53p263
Paleontological Sonification: Letting Music Bring Fossils to Your Ears
A. A. Ekdale, Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Utah
Alan C. Tripp, Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Utah
URL for this article: http://www.nagt.org/nagt/jge/abstracts/may05.html#v53p271
Scientists and Public Outreach: Participation, Motivations, and Impediments
Elisabeth Andrews, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES), University of Colorado - Boulder
Alex Weaver, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES), University of Colorado - Boulder
Daniel Hanley, School of Education and Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES), University of Colorado - Boulder
Jeffrey Shamatha, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Northern Arizona University
Ginger Melton, Ethnography and Evaluation Research, Center to Advance Research and Teaching in the Social Sciences, University of Colorado - Boulder
Public funding agencies are increasingly requiring "broader impact" components in research grants. Concurrently, national educational leaders are calling for scientists to partner with educators to reform science education. Through the use of survey and interview data, our study examined the participation of researchers, faculty members, and graduate students from federal research laboratories and a Research I university, who were involved in K-12 and public outreach activities.
We found that scientists were often recruited into K-12 outreach activities by local departmental liaisons, colleagues, or professors. Scientists most frequently gave presentations, tutored, and organized or judged science fairs. Outreach participation varied by career stage, job type, and gender. The strongest motivating factors were a desire to contribute and enjoying their outreach experiences. For graduate students and researchers, a third motivating factor was the chance to improve their teaching and communication skills. Scientists of all types, however, viewed outreach as a form of volunteer work that was auxiliary to their other responsibilities. Time constraints due to other, higher priorities, the lower value placed on outreach by departments, and a lack of detailed information about outreach opportunities were significant barriers to participation. Even so, only a few scientists viewed their outreach experiences negatively, mostly due to classroom management, logistical, or organizational problems, or a lack of outreach skills.
URL for this article: http://www.nagt.org/nagt/jge/abstracts/may05.html#v53p281
Developing and Presenting Geoscience Interpretive Programs at Nez Perce National Historical Park, Idaho
Shane V. Smith, Department of Geology, Washington State University
URL for this article: http://www.nagt.org/nagt/jge/abstracts/may05.html#v53p294
Students' Understanding of Complex Dynamic Systems
Federica Raia, Departments of Earth and Atmospheric Science, and Secondary Education, City College of New York
URL for this article: http://www.nagt.org/nagt/jge/abstracts/may05.html#v53p297
Elementary Students' Ideas Concerning Fossil Fuel Energy
Audrey C. Rule, Department of Curriculum and Instruction, 116 Swetman Hall, State University of New York at Oswego
Forty-two academically gifted and thirty-two average-achieving elementary students in grades one through six were interviewed to determine ideas concerning fossil fuel energy. There were no significant differences between the responses of the two populations. Major categories of misconceptions encountered during interviews included misconceptions about: configuration or distribution of petroleum reservoirs, gasoline manufacture and storage, the origin of petroleum, the importance of petroleum in our society, petroleum prospecting and recovery; and the nature of coal and natural gas.
Misconceptions about fossil fuels arise for a variety of reasons. Students sometimes misunderstand scenes from movies, televisions shows or cartoons, make incorrect analogies with more familiar experiences, misinterpret diagrams in printed materials, misconstrue the meanings of symbols, or confuse similar-sounding terms or words with more than one meaning.
Sixty-seven preservice teachers responding to a ten-question survey to investigate the persistence of fossil fuel misconceptions into adulthood revealed many held the same ideas as elementary students, confirming the importance of addressing younger students' ideas during instruction.
URL for this article: http://www.nagt.org/nagt/jge/abstracts/may05.html#v53p309
Who Believes What? Clearing up Confusion over Intelligent Design and Young-Earth Creationism
Marcus R. Ross, Department of Geosciences, 330 Woodward Hall, University of Rhode Island
URL for this article: http://www.nagt.org/nagt/jge/abstracts/may05.html#v53p319
Column (reprint) - Computational Geology 29: Quantitative Literacy: Spreadsheets, Range Charts and Triangular Plots
Len Vacher, University of South Florida
Column - Computational Geology 30: Archimedes Bath - A Better Story
Len Vacher, University of South Florida