Cutting Edge > Develop Program-Wide Abilities > Undergraduate Research > 2014 Workshop > Activities > Geoscience education research project

Geoscience education research project

Karen Kortz, Community College of Rhode Island
Author Profile

This activity has benefited from input from faculty educators beyond the author through a review and suggestion process.

This review took place as a part of a faculty professional development workshop where groups of faculty reviewed each others' activities and offered feedback and ideas for improvements. To learn more about the process On the Cutting Edge uses for activity review, see

This activity was selected for the On the Cutting Edge Reviewed Teaching Collection

This activity has received positive reviews in a peer review process involving five review categories. The five categories included in the process are

  • Scientific Accuracy
  • Alignment of Learning Goals, Activities, and Assessments
  • Pedagogic Effectiveness
  • Robustness (usability and dependability of all components)
  • Completeness of the ActivitySheet web page

For more information about the peer review process itself, please see

This page first made public: Aug 8, 2014


Students complete a scientific research project including asking a question, developing methods, collecting data, analyzing and interpreting data, and communicating results. The research question begins "What do other students think about _____" and students fill in the blank with a topic that interests them from the class. Although it is geoscience education research, it involves students in the process of science while learning about a topic of their choosing, making it an effective learning tool for all students.



This project was initially designed for an introductory geology class for non-majors. However, it can be adapted to apply to a variety of geoscience undergraduate courses. I used it in a class of ~30 students – it can definitely be used in smaller classes, but classes that are significantly larger may require some modifications (e.g. poster presentation instead of powerpoint presentation, possibly some help to give students feedback).

Skills and concepts that students must have mastered


How the activity is situated in the course

This project is a semester-long project resulting in a final presentation. There are checkpoint assignments throughout the semester to ensure students are on track.


Content/concepts goals for this activity

The goal is to have students learn the process of science while learning a topic of their choosing, which will vary by student.

Higher order thinking skills goals for this activity

Analysis of data
Synthesis of ideas
Evaluation of results
Generation of conclusions and recommendations
Critique of peer work

Other skills goals for this activity

Presentation (The activity is written to be an oral presentation, but it can be modified to be poster or written presentations as well)
Working in groups

Description and Teaching Materials

The supporting materials for this activity included are: 1) Directions (Microsoft Word 77kB Aug8 14), 2) Handouts of checkpoint activities (Microsoft Word 51kB Aug8 14) supporting the project, 3) Evaluation rubric (Microsoft Word 53kB Aug11 14).

Students are given the directions at the beginning of the semester. These detailed directions tell them the intermediate checkpoint deadlines as well as what they are expected to do at each step. Throughout the semester, they complete a scientific research project from start to finish, beginning with coming up with a research question and ending with presenting their results. The directions are written for students who do not have experience with doing these different components of scientific research.

There are four checkpoint deadlines throughout the semester where students are expected to complete a different step of the project. Activities are associated with each of these four steps. These activities are designed so students can give each other feedback on their progress, which helps to alleviate the burden on the professor.

An evaluation rubric is provided for the final powerpoint presentation. In addition, students evaluate and give feedback to each other on their final presentations, and that form is included as well. Students are not expected to produce publishable-quality results, but their results generally are interesting!

The key to this project is that students are doing research, and this process relates to the many fields within the geosciences. The detailed directions and level of results expected of students make it so all instructors can use this activity, not just ones who are knowledgeable about geoscience education.

Teaching Notes and Tips

Additional information about each of the checkpoint Activities


In order to continue the emphasis on the process of science, I recommend that some sort of follow-up reflection is included for students to respond to. Examples of questions to ask are how the student personally benefitted, how it was the same as or different from expectations, how their ideas of how science is done changed, how their attitudes towards science changed, how this project affected their knowledge and attitudes compared to a more traditional book or internet research project, etc.



I use the attached rubric to grade the final presentations. I also used a follow-up self reflection, asking students to relate what they did for the presentation to the process of science.

References and Resources


See more Activities »