Cutting Edge > Teaching Methods > Structured Academic Controversy > References

References


Barbour, I.G. (2000). When science meets religion: Enemies, strangers, or partners? : New York: Harper San Francisco.

Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3-15.

Bybee, R. W. (2000). Evolution: Don't debate, educate. The Science Teacher, 67(7), 3.

Clough, M.P. (1994). Diminish students' resistance to biological evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 56(7), 409-415.

Confrey, J. (1995). How compatible are radical constructivism, sociocultural approaches, and social constructivism? In L. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in Education (pp.185-228). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

D'Eon, M., Proctor, P., & Reeder, B. (2007). Comparing two cooperative small group formats used with physical therapy and medical students. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 44(1), 31-44.

Euben, D. (2003). Legal issues in the classroom. Presentation to the Appalachian College Association Teaching and Learning Institute. Retrieved December 17, 2008. (citation and description)

Gould, Stephen Jay. (1999). Rocks of ages: Science and religion in the fullness of life. New York: Ballantine Publishing Group.

Hanson, R.W. (1987). Introduction: Science or belief, a false dichotomy. In Hanson, R.W., (Ed.). Science and Creation: Geological, Theological, and Educational Perspectives. New York: Macmillan Publishing.

Honoring diversity in the classroom: Challenges and reflections (1996). Regina, Canada: Saskatchewan Professional Development Unit. (citation and description)

Hutton, Thomas. (2003). Legal Guidance: What the Courts Say About Teaching Evolution. The American School Board Journal, 190(4), 33.

Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1994). "Structuring academic controversy." In Handbook of cooperative learning methods. Sharan, S. (Ed.), Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

Johnson, D., Johnson, R., & Smith, K. (1996). Academic controversy: enriching college instruction through intellectual conflict. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports, 25(3), 1-123.

Khourey-Bowers, C. (2006). Structured Academic Controversy: A Peaceful approach to controversial issues. The American Biology Teacher 68(5). (Online publication)

National Association of Biology Teachers (2008). NABT statement on teaching evolution. Retrieved October 8, 2008 at: http://www.nabt.org/websites/institution/index.php?p=92

National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Pigliucci, Massimo. (2003). Denying evolution: Creationism, scientism, and the nature of science. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.

Scharmann, L.C. Enhancing an understanding of the premises of evolutionary theory: The influence a diversified instructional strategy. School Science and Mathematics, 90(2), 91-100.

Shotter, J. (1995). In Dialogue: Social Constructionism and Radical Constructivism. In Constructivism in Education. Steffe, L.P. and Gale, J.E. (Eds.), 41-56. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Tort, P. (2001). Darwin and the science of evolution. Harry N. Abrams: New York.

Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing Constructivism in Practice as the Negotiation of Dilemmas: An Analysis of the Conceptual, Pedagogical, Cultural, and Political Challenges Facing Teachers. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 131-175.

Zimmer, C. (2001). Evolution: The Triumph of an idea. HarperCollins: New York.


« Previous Page