Exploring topographic steady-state in Taiwan
This activity was selected for the On the Cutting Edge Exemplary Teaching Collection
Resources in this top level collection a) must have scored Exemplary or Very Good in all five review categories, and must also rate as “Exemplary” in at least three of the five categories. The five categories included in the peer review process are
- Scientific Accuracy
- Alignment of Learning Goals, Activities, and Assessments
- Pedagogic Effectiveness
- Robustness (usability and dependability of all components)
- Completeness of the ActivitySheet web page
For more information about the peer review process itself, please see http://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/review.html.
This page first made public: Jun 9, 2014
An extension involves developing a simple numerical model in Excel of a mountain range as it progresses to topographic steady-state landscape, allowing students to investigate the rise of a mountain range to steady-state both from Taiwan data and from their numerical model.
I use this in an upper-level geology elective course in tectonic geomorphology, although it could also be used in a geomorphology class. The students are generally a mix of junior and senior majors and graduate students (M.S.). This is the first lab for the course.
Although this exercise as it is written is for an upper-level class, it could be easily adapted for lower-level classes through the choice of questions to investigate during the data synthesis half of the lab.
Skills and concepts that students must have mastered
Concepts covered in class before we do this lab include basic models for accretion and uplift, theories of mountain range development, and concepts of dynamic steady-state. We usually cover critical wedge theory before the second week of this lab, but it is not an essential component of the lab.
How the activity is situated in the course
Content/concepts goals for this activity
Accretion, uplift, and erosion
Higher order thinking skills goals for this activity
Evaluation of theoretical concepts in a real mountain range
Extension (with numerical model): Numerical modeling and comparison and evaluation of competing approaches (numerical modeling vs. DEM analyses)
Other skills goals for this activity
Data plotting in Excel
Analyses of group datasets
Contributing to a group dataset, with the inherent responsibility that comes with knowing others will be relying upon your data.
Description and Teaching Materials
There are 5 files attached. The first is the activity I hand students for week 1. The second is the activity I hand them for week 2 (data synthesis and report writing). The third is the numerical modeling activity we run in week 3 (optional extension). This was originally written by John Swenson at UMD. The fourth file has my notes on how to run the labs, including class notes on building a simple model of accretion and uplift with an elevation-dependent erosional response. The fifth file is a zip file with the shapefile for the 10km wide swaths across Taiwan. The DEM itself can be obtained online at https://lta.cr.usgs.gov/GTOPO30 (as of June 2014). This version of the lab is written for ArcGIS 10.2.Student handout for data collection (week 1) (Microsoft Word 2007 (.docx) 958kB Jun7 14)
Student handout for week 2 (Microsoft Word 2007 (.docx) 17kB Jun7 14)
Numerical model extension (Microsoft Word 2007 (.docx) 61kB Jun9 14)
Instructor Notes (Microsoft Word 2007 (.docx) 881kB Jun9 14)
Taiwan swath shapefile (Zip Archive 4kB Jun9 14)
Teaching Notes and Tips
See the above file with instructor notes for more details.
This is run as a 2 week lab. During week 1, the students collect data. I divide up the range amongst the class so that each student is responsible for a subset of the data collection and processing. In week 2, they get the group dataset back and have to synthesize the data and answer questions that relate concepts discussed in class (isostasy, accretion and uplift, topographic steady-state, etc.) to the dataset.
An optional extension is to have students construct a simple numerical model with accretion, uplift, isostasy, and erosion and relate that back to their observations from the Taiwan dataset.