Cutting Edge > Data, Simulations and Models > Workshop 03 > View Submissions > From the Indoor Lab to the Outdoor Lab: Using XRF Data

From the Indoor Lab to the Outdoor Lab: Using XRF Data

submitted by

Robert F. Dymek Washington University
Author Profile

Students learn how to prepare samples for XRF analysis by collecting samples in the field and going through each step of the process in order to obtain analyical results.
GSA Poster (Acrobat (PDF) 1.3MB Nov24 03)

Learning Goals

Content/Concepts:

Higher Order Thinking Skills:

Characterzation and Interpretation of analytical data

Other Skills:

Context

Instructional Level:

Upper level undergraduate major, graduate student

Skills Needed:

Mineralogy, Petrology, Geologic field work

Role of Activity in a Course:

This project can begin anytime in the course. The field trip and sample collection can happen in the beginning and the sample prep can be and on-going activity. Once the analyses are completed, the students are invited to characterize and interpret their data using all of the theoretical and practical approaches developed in the lecture part of the course.

Data, Tools and Logistics

Required Tools:

XRF Lab

Logistical Challenges:

Evaluation

Evaluation Goals:

Evaluation Techniques:

Description

The St. Francois Mountains (SFM), located in southeast Missouri, represent the structural culmination of the Ozark Dome. Of particular interest is the presense there of extensive outcroppings of 1.3-1.4 Ga rhyolite and granite. As such, the rhyolite-granite outcrops in the SFM represent the largest exposures of Precambrian bedrock in the mid-continent area.

Extensive mapping and laboratory studies by M.E. Bickford and colleagues have revealed the presence of (at least) two caldera complexes in SFM, the largest of which is highlighted in the above map. This so-called "Butler Hill" caldera is characterized by central plutons of fine- to coarse-grained high-silica granite, by medium-grained ring plutons of intermediate silica content, and by voluminous occurrences of rhyolitic ignimbrites. The ring plutons are colored on the above map, and one of these - the Silvermines Pluton - was the main focus of this project.

At Hughes Mountain, a rhyolitic ignimbrite with a well-developed subhorizotal fabric consisting of flattened pumice fragments is characterized by beautiful columnar jointing.

The Knoblick Granite, another of the ring plutons, is a shallow-level intrusion that was emplaced into its own volcanic cover.

The Silvermines Granite is locally cut by basaltic dikes, one of which is shown here.

At "Tiemanns Shut-ins," a locality near the center of the Silvermines Granite, typical medium-grained, pale pinkish-gray granite is intruded by a finer-grained diorite, and by later fine-grained aplites. The diorite has commingled with the granite, as manifested by cuspate contacts and widespread globules of diorite within granite.

Although granites and rhyolites were analyzed by the class from several localities within the SFM, we focused on the striking features found at Tiemanns Shut-ins. In particular, we wanted to test the hypothesis that the diorites represent the product of mixing between granite and basalt, as proposed for similar-looking mafic enclaves in other settings. So, samples of Silvermines Granites, from Tiemanns and elsewhere, samples of diorite and an aplite from Tiemanns, and basaltic dikes were analyzed for major and trace elements by XRF methods. The resultant data are illustrated in this panel.

Characterization.

In the Qtz-Or-An+Ab, the analyzed granites and diorites form a linear array, approximately radial to the plagioclase corner. The "granites" lie in the granodiorite field, whereas the "diorites" lie in the quartz-monzodiorite field. Of particular note is the fact that the "Tiemanns granite" are close in composition to "Silvermines granite" from other localities in the pluton.

In the An-Ab-Or ternary, all of the "granites" and the "aplite" lie in the granite field, whereas the "diorites" analyze as granodiorite and trondhjemite.


Differentiation.

On the Harker variation diagrams for major elements, the diorites lie between the fields for the granites and the basalts, which permits a "mixed" origin for the diorites. The composition of the aplite is consistent with it being a late differentiate of the granites.

The distribution of data points on the Ba-Sr plot is consistent with a "mixed" origin for the diorites. However, on the Zr-Nb plot, the diorite analyses overlap with those of the basalts, which is problematic for the mixing hypothesis.


Discriminant Diagrams.

The granites and rhyolites of the SFM are widely regarded by some investigators as examples of A-type or anorogenic granites. Hence, we might expect their compositions to fall within the proscribed fields on various discriminant plots. However, on the Nb—Y and Nb+Y—Rb plots of Pearce et al., the SFM granites (and diorites) lie in the field of "volcanic arc granites" (VAG) rather than the field of "within plate granites" (WPG).

On the Ti—V discriminant plot of Shervais (1982), the basaltic dikes fall in the field of alkalic basalts and continental flood basalts, which is consistent with their setting and overall chemical compositions.